Carvalho Madalena, Guerra Ana Teresa, Moniz Marta, Escobar Carlos, Nunes Pedro, Bento Vanda, Abadesso Clara
Pediatric Service, Child and Youth Department, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Lisboa, PRT.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 8;16(8):e66451. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66451. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Background Painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department often require the use of sedation and analgesia to ensure adequate pain control, a right of children and adolescents. This study aims to describe the procedural sedation and analgesia with intravenous medications performed in a pediatric emergency department. Methods This is a retrospective descriptive study of intravenous sedoanalgesia used in a pediatric emergency department of a level II district hospital in the Lisbon metropolitan area from October 2018 to December 2023. The type of intervention, drugs used, and adverse events were analyzed. Results A total of 615 patients were included in the study; 65.7% (n=404) were male with a median age of 6 years. The most frequently performed procedures were wound suturing (50.9%, n=313) and fracture reduction (36.3%, n=223). The drugs used for sedation and analgesia were ketamine (99.2%, n=610), midazolam (95.8%, n=589), propofol (1.6%, n=10), and morphine (0.5%, n=3). The majority of patients received midazolam and ketamine in association (93.8%, n=577). A total of 50 adverse events (8.1%) were recorded in 42 patients. The most frequent side effects were transient oxygen desaturation (2%, n=12), vomiting (1.5%, n=9), apnea/bradypnea (1%, n=6), and hallucinations (0.8%, n=5). The occurrence of adverse events was not dose-dependent ( >0.05). Respiratory complications resolved without requiring invasive interventions. Children were sedated by a pediatric intensivist in 68.1% (n=419), by a general pediatrician in 26.7% (n=164), and by a pediatric resident in 2% (n=12). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that intravenous sedoanalgesia, particularly the combination of ketamine and midazolam, is a safe method for sedation in pediatric patients, with a low rate of adverse events.
在儿科急诊科进行的疼痛性操作通常需要使用镇静和镇痛药物,以确保充分控制疼痛,这是儿童和青少年的一项权利。本研究旨在描述在儿科急诊科使用静脉药物进行的程序性镇静和镇痛情况。
这是一项对2018年10月至2023年12月在里斯本大都市区一家二级地区医院的儿科急诊科使用静脉镇静镇痛的回顾性描述性研究。分析了干预类型、使用的药物和不良事件。
共有615例患者纳入研究;65.7%(n = 404)为男性,中位年龄为6岁。最常进行的操作是伤口缝合(50.9%,n = 313)和骨折复位(36.3%,n = 223)。用于镇静和镇痛的药物有氯胺酮(99.2%,n = 610)、咪达唑仑(95.8%,n = 589)、丙泊酚(1.6%,n = 10)和吗啡(0.5%,n = 3)。大多数患者联合使用咪达唑仑和氯胺酮(93.8%,n = 577)。共42例患者记录到50例不良事件(8.1%)。最常见的副作用是短暂性氧饱和度下降(2%,n = 12)、呕吐(1.5%,n = 9)、呼吸暂停/呼吸过缓(1%,n = 6)和幻觉(0.8%,n = 5)。不良事件的发生与剂量无关(>0.05)。呼吸并发症无需侵入性干预即可缓解。68.1%(n = 419)的儿童由儿科重症监护医生镇静,26.7%(n = 164)由普通儿科医生镇静,2%(n = 12)由儿科住院医师镇静。
本研究结果表明,静脉镇静镇痛,尤其是氯胺酮和咪达唑仑联合使用,是儿科患者镇静的一种安全方法,不良事件发生率低。