Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;44(10):1650-1656. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.27. Epub 2023 May 15.
The true incidence and risk factors for secondary bacterial infections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains poorly understood. Knowledge of risk factors for secondary infections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is necessary to optimally guide selective use of empiric antimicrobial therapy.
Single-center retrospective cohort study of symptomatic inpatients admitted for COVID-19 from April 15, 2020, through June 30, 2021.
Academic quaternary-care referral center in Portland, Oregon.
The study included patients who were 18 years or older with a positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR test up to 10 days prior to admission.
Secondary infections were identified based on clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic data. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for secondary infection. We also assessed mortality, length of stay, and empiric antibiotics among those with and without secondary infections.
We identified 118 patients for inclusion; 31 (26.3%) had either culture-proven or possible secondary infections among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Mortality was higher among patients with secondary infections (35.5%) compared to those without secondary infection (4.6%). Empiric antibiotic use on admission was high in both the secondary and no secondary infection groups at 71.0% and 48.3%, respectively.
The incidence of secondary bacterial infection was moderate among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, a higher proportion of patients received empiric antibiotics regardless of an identifiable secondary infection. Transfer from an outside hospital, baseline immunosuppressant use, and corticosteroid treatment were independent risk factors for secondary infection. Additional studies are needed to validate risk factors and best guide antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
新冠病毒病 2019(COVID-19)继发细菌性感染的真实发病率和危险因素仍知之甚少。了解 COVID-19 住院患者继发感染的危险因素对于最佳指导经验性抗菌治疗的选择性使用是必要的。
2020 年 4 月 15 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间,对因 COVID-19 住院的有症状患者进行的单中心回顾性队列研究。
俄勒冈州波特兰市的学术四级保健转诊中心。
研究纳入年龄在 18 岁及以上、入院前 10 天内 SARS-CoV-2 聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测阳性的患者。
根据临床、影像学和微生物学数据确定继发感染。采用 logistic 回归分析识别继发感染的危险因素。我们还评估了继发感染和无继发感染患者的死亡率、住院时间和经验性抗生素使用情况。
我们纳入了 118 例患者;31 例(26.3%)住院 COVID-19 患者存在培养证实或可能的继发感染。继发感染患者的死亡率(35.5%)高于无继发感染患者(4.6%)。在继发感染和无继发感染组,入院时经验性使用抗生素的比例分别为 71.0%和 48.3%。
住院 COVID-19 患者继发细菌性感染的发生率中等。然而,无论是否存在可识别的继发感染,更多的患者接受了经验性抗生素治疗。从外院转来、基线免疫抑制剂使用和皮质类固醇治疗是继发感染的独立危险因素。需要进一步的研究来验证这些危险因素,并为最佳的抗菌药物管理努力提供指导。