Suppr超能文献

奥密克戎变异株主导期与奥密克戎变异株流行前期新冠病毒感染者住院期间合并感染和继发感染对抗生素使用影响的差异。

Difference in the impact of coinfections and secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between the Omicron-dominant period and the pre-Omicron period.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokoname City Hospital, 3-3-3 Asukadai, Tokoname, Aichi, 479-8510, Japan.

Department of Pharmacy, Tokoname City Hospital, 3-3-3 Asukadai, Tokoname, Aichi, 479-8510, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2024 Sep;30(9):853-859. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effect of coinfections and/or secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHOD

Days of therapy per 100 bed days (DOT) in a COVID-19 ward were compared between 2022 (Omicron period) and 2021 (pre-Omicron period). Antibiotics were categorized as antibiotics predominantly used for community-acquired infections (CAIs) and antibiotics predominantly used for health care-associated infections (HAIs). Bacterial and/or fungal infections which were proved or assumed on admission were defined as coinfections. Secondary infections were defined as infections that occurred following COVID-19.

RESULTS

Patients with COVID-19 during the Omicron period were older and had more comorbidities. Coinfections were more common in the Omicron period than in the pre-Omicron period (44.4% [100/225] versus 0.8% [2/257], respectively, p < 0.001), and the mean DOT of antibiotics for CAIs was significantly increased in the Omicron period (from 3.60 to 17.84, p < 0.001). Secondary infection rate tended to be higher in the Omicron period (p = 0.097). Mean DOT of antibiotics for HAIs were appeared to be lower in the COVID-19 ward than in the general ward (pre-Omicron, 3.33 versus 6.37, respectively; Omicron, 3.84 versus 5.22, respectively). No multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms were isolated in the COVID-19 ward.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic use for CAIs was limited in the pre-Omicron period but increased in the Omicron period because of a high coinfection rate on admission. With the antimicrobial stewardship, excessive use of antibiotics for HAIs was avoided in the COVID-19 ward during both periods.

摘要

介绍

本研究评估了合并感染和/或继发感染对因 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者使用抗生素的影响。

方法

比较了 2022 年(Omicron 时期)和 2021 年(Omicron 前时期)COVID-19 病房每 100 个床位日的治疗天数(DOT)。抗生素分为主要用于社区获得性感染(CAIs)的抗生素和主要用于与医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)的抗生素。入院时确诊或假定的细菌和/或真菌感染定义为合并感染。继发感染定义为 COVID-19 后发生的感染。

结果

Omicron 时期的 COVID-19 患者年龄较大,合并症更多。Omicron 时期的合并感染发生率高于 Omicron 前时期(44.4%[100/225] vs. 0.8%[2/257],p<0.001),CAIs 抗生素的平均 DOT 在 Omicron 时期显著增加(从 3.60 增加到 17.84,p<0.001)。Omicron 时期继发感染率有升高趋势(p=0.097)。COVID-19 病房 HAIs 抗生素的平均 DOT 似乎低于普通病房(Omicron 前时期分别为 3.33 和 6.37;Omicron 时期分别为 3.84 和 5.22)。COVID-19 病房未分离出耐多药革兰阴性菌。

结论

Omicron 前时期,由于入院时合并感染率较高,CAIs 的抗生素使用受到限制,但在 Omicron 时期增加。在两个时期,通过抗菌药物管理,COVID-19 病房都避免了 HAIs 抗生素的过度使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验