• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Factors That May Impact Physician-based Decisions for Placing Indwelling Pleural Catheters.评估可能影响医生决定留置胸腔导管的因素。
2
Impact of a Dedicated Pleural Clinic on Indwelling Pleural Catheter Related Outcomes: A Retrospective Single Center Experience.专科胸腔诊所对留置胸腔导管相关结局的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2023 Apr 1;30(2):114-121. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000901.
3
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing indwelling pleural catheters with talc pleurodesis (NVALT-14).一项比较留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的随机对照试验(NVALT - 14)。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
The Hospital and Patient Burden of Indwelling Pleural Catheters: A Retrospective Case Series of 210 Indwelling Pleural Catheter Insertions.留置胸腔导管的医院和患者负担:210 例留置胸腔导管插入术的回顾性病例系列。
Respiration. 2019;97(1):70-77. doi: 10.1159/000491934. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
7
Silver Nitrate-coated versus Standard Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusions: The SWIFT Randomized Trial.硝酸银涂层与标准留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液:SWIFT 随机试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Oct;19(10):1722-1729. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1301OC.
8
Management of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters or talc pleurodesis.留置胸腔导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Can Respir J. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):106-10. doi: 10.1155/2013/842768.
9
Indwelling pleural catheters reduce inpatient days over pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion.留置胸腔导管可减少恶性胸腔积液行胸膜固定术的住院天数。
Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):394-400. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2657.
10
Predictors of Indwelling Pleural Catheter Removal and Infection: A Single-center Experience With 336 Procedures.胸腔留置导管拔除及感染的预测因素:336例手术的单中心经验
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2020 Apr;27(2):86-94. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000632.

引用本文的文献

1
[Predictive Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Prognosis and 
Spontaneous Pleurodesis of Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 
and Malignant Pleural Effusion].[预后营养指数对晚期非小细胞肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液患者预后及自发性胸膜固定术的预测价值]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 20;27(12):931-939. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.33.

评估可能影响医生决定留置胸腔导管的因素。

Assessing Factors That May Impact Physician-based Decisions for Placing Indwelling Pleural Catheters.

作者信息

Alexander Matthew, Ishisaka Yoshiko, Miyakawa Lina, Rothman Adam

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside-West.

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel.

出版信息

J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Jan 1;31(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000926.

DOI:10.1097/LBR.0000000000000926
PMID:37185887
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion is a common finding in patients with advanced cancer and is a frequent cause of dyspnea. Current guidelines indicate thoracentesis for symptomatic patients, while indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) are recommended for patients who develop pleural fluid re-accumulation. IPC maintenance, however, requires a significant level of financial and social support. This study aims to analyze potential influencing factors that may play a role in the decision for placing IPCs in patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusions.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected baseline sociodemographic and laboratory data in patients who underwent thoracentesis for malignant pleural effusion from August 2016 to October 2021, and selected patients who presented with re-accumulation of pleural fluid within 30 days or had a pulmonary physician's note documenting that IPC is a potential management option. Of these selected patients (IPC candidates), we stratified patients who underwent IPC placement and those who did not, and performed statistical analysis between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six patients who underwent thoracentesis were regarded as IPC candidates. Almost all baseline sociodemographic characteristics, including ethnicity ( P =0.637), sex ( P =0.655), and marital status ( P =0.773) were similar between the 2 groups, but significantly higher ECOG scores ( P =0.049) were noted in the IPC group. No statistically significant differences were noted in age, body mass index, platelet, PTT, international normalized ratio, creatinine, white blood cell, red blood cells, fluid protein, or fluid lactate dehydrogenase. Fluid albumin ( P =0.057) and serum neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio ( P =0.003) were significantly higher in patients without IPC placement.

CONCLUSION

This study did not recognize any baseline sociodemographic factors that may contribute to the decision to place IPCs.

摘要

简介

恶性胸腔积液是晚期癌症患者常见的表现,也是呼吸困难的常见原因。目前的指南表明,对于有症状的患者进行胸腔穿刺术,而对于出现胸腔积液再积聚的患者则推荐使用留置胸腔导管(IPC)。然而,IPC 的维护需要大量的财务和社会支持。本研究旨在分析可能影响复发性恶性胸腔积液患者放置 IPC 的决策的潜在影响因素。

方法

本研究回顾性收集了 2016 年 8 月至 2021 年 10 月期间因恶性胸腔积液行胸腔穿刺术的患者的基线社会人口统计学和实验室数据,并选择了在 30 天内出现胸腔积液再积聚或有肺科医生记录表明 IPC 是一种潜在治疗选择的患者。在这些选定的患者(IPC 候选者)中,我们对接受 IPC 放置的患者和未接受 IPC 放置的患者进行分层,并对这两组患者进行统计学分析。

结果

176 例接受胸腔穿刺术的患者被视为 IPC 候选者。两组患者的几乎所有基线社会人口统计学特征,包括种族(P=0.637)、性别(P=0.655)和婚姻状况(P=0.773)均相似,但 IPC 组的 ECOG 评分显著较高(P=0.049)。两组患者的年龄、体重指数、血小板、PTT、国际标准化比值、肌酐、白细胞、红细胞、积液蛋白或积液乳酸脱氢酶均无统计学差异。但未放置 IPC 的患者的积液白蛋白(P=0.057)和血清中性粒细胞:淋巴细胞比值(P=0.003)显著较高。

结论

本研究未发现任何可能影响放置 IPC 决策的基线社会人口统计学因素。