From the Department of Neurology (L.B., S.A.-R., P.S., M.O.), Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; Section of Neurology (L.B., G.B., F.P.P., L.G., L.P.), Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy; Department of Neurology (S.H., P.O., M.O.), Ulm University, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders Ulm (DZNE e.V.) (P.O.); and Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.M.), University of Genoa, Italy.
Neurology. 2023 Jul 4;101(1):e50-e62. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207371. Epub 2023 May 15.
Patients with Lewy body disease (LBD) often show a co-occurring Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology. CSF biomarkers allow the detection in vivo of AD-related pathologic hallmarks included in the amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (AT(N)) classification system. Here, we aimed to investigate whether CSF biomarkers of synaptic and neuroaxonal damage are correlated with the presence of AD copathology in LBD and can be useful to differentiate patients with LBD with different AT(N) profiles.
We retrospectively measured CSF levels of AD core biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau protein, and total tau protein) and of synaptic (β-synuclein, α-synuclein, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 [SNAP-25], and neurogranin) and neuroaxonal proteins (neurofilament light chain [NfL]) in 28 cognitively unimpaired participants with nondegenerative neurologic conditions and 161 participants with a diagnosis of either LBD or AD (at both mild cognitive impairment, AD-MCI, and dementia stages, AD-dem). We compared CSF biomarker levels in clinical and AT(N)-based subgroups.
CSF β-synuclein, α-synuclein, SNAP-25, neurogranin, and NfL levels did not differ between LBD (n = 101, age 67.2 ± 7.8 years, 27.7% females) and controls (age 64.8 ± 8.6 years, 39.3% females) and were increased in AD (AD-MCI: n = 30, AD-dem: n = 30, age 72.3 ± 6.0 years, 63.3% females) compared with both groups ( < 0.001 for all comparisons). In LBD, we found increased levels of synaptic and neuroaxonal degeneration biomarkers in patients with A+T+ (LBD/A+T+) than with A-T- profiles (LBD/A-T-) ( < 0.01 for all), and β-synuclein showed the highest discriminative accuracy between the 2 groups (area under the curve 0.938, 95% CI 0.884-0.991). CSF β-synuclein ( = 0.0021), α-synuclein ( = 0.0099), and SNAP-25 concentrations ( = 0.013) were also higher in LBD/A+T+ than in LBD/A+T- cases, which had synaptic biomarker levels within the normal range. CSF α-synuclein was significantly decreased only in patients with LBD with T- profiles compared with controls ( = 0.0448). Moreover, LBD/A+T+ and AD cases did not differ in any biomarker level.
LBD/A+T+ and AD cases showed significantly increased CSF levels of synaptic and neuroaxonal biomarkers compared with LBD/A-T- and control subjects. Patients with LBD and AT(N)-based AD copathology showed, thus, a distinct signature of synaptic dysfunction from other LBD cases.
This study provides Class II evidence that CSF levels of β-synuclein, α-synuclein, SNAP-25, neurogranin, and NfL are higher in patients with AD than in patients with LBD.
路易体病(LBD)患者常伴有阿尔茨海默病(AD)病理。脑脊液生物标志物可在体内检测到包括在淀粉样蛋白-tau-神经退行性变(AT(N))分类系统中的 AD 相关病理标志物。在这里,我们旨在研究突触和神经轴突损伤的 CSF 生物标志物是否与 LBD 中 AD 共病的存在相关,并且是否可以用于区分具有不同 AT(N)谱的 LBD 患者。
我们回顾性地测量了 28 名认知正常的非神经退行性疾病患者和 161 名 LBD 或 AD 患者(轻度认知障碍、AD-MCI 和痴呆,AD-dem)的 AD 核心生物标志物(Aβ42/40 比值、磷酸化 tau 蛋白和总 tau 蛋白)以及突触(β-突触核蛋白、α-突触核蛋白、突触小体相关蛋白 25(SNAP-25)和神经颗粒蛋白)和神经轴突蛋白(神经丝轻链[NfL])的 CSF 水平。我们比较了临床和基于 AT(N)的亚组中的 CSF 生物标志物水平。
LBD(n = 101,年龄 67.2 ± 7.8 岁,27.7%为女性)和对照组(n = 101,年龄 64.8 ± 8.6 岁,39.3%为女性)之间的 CSF β-突触核蛋白、α-突触核蛋白、SNAP-25、神经颗粒蛋白和 NfL 水平没有差异,且 AD(AD-MCI:n = 30,AD-dem:n = 30,年龄 72.3 ± 6.0 岁,63.3%为女性)与两组相比均升高(所有比较均 < 0.001)。在 LBD 中,我们发现 A+T+(LBD/A+T+)患者的突触和神经轴突退行性变生物标志物水平高于 A-T-(LBD/A-T-)患者(所有比较均 < 0.01),β-突触核蛋白在两组之间具有最高的鉴别准确性(曲线下面积 0.938,95%置信区间 0.884-0.991)。LBD/A+T+患者的 CSF β-突触核蛋白( = 0.0021)、α-突触核蛋白( = 0.0099)和 SNAP-25 浓度( = 0.013)也高于 LBD/A+T-病例,后者的突触生物标志物水平在正常范围内。与对照组相比,仅 LBD 患者的 T- 型病例中 CSF α-突触核蛋白显著降低( = 0.0448)。此外,LBD/A+T+和 AD 病例在任何生物标志物水平上均无差异。
与 LBD/A-T-和对照组相比,LBD/A+T+和 AD 病例的 CSF 中突触和神经轴突生物标志物水平显著升高。因此,具有 AT(N)基于 AD 共病的 LBD 患者表现出与其他 LBD 病例不同的突触功能障碍特征。
本研究提供了 II 级证据,表明 AD 患者的 CSF 中β-突触核蛋白、α-突触核蛋白、SNAP-25、神经颗粒蛋白和 NfL 水平高于 LBD 患者。