Thal Dietmar Rudolf, Poesen Koen, Vandenberghe Rik, De Meyer Steffi
Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory for Neuropathology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mol Neurodegener. 2025 Mar 14;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13024-025-00819-y.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is neuropathologically characterized by the extracellular deposition of the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) and the intraneuronal accumulation of abnormal phosphorylated tau (τ)-protein (p-τ). Most frequently, these hallmark lesions are accompanied by other co-pathologies in the brain that may contribute to cognitive impairment, such as vascular lesions, intraneuronal accumulation of phosphorylated transactive-response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and/or α-synuclein (αSyn) aggregates. To estimate the extent of these AD and co-pathologies in patients, several biomarkers have been developed. Specific tracers target and visualize Aβ plaques, p-τ and αSyn pathology or inflammation by positron emission tomography. In addition to these imaging biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood-based biomarker assays reflecting AD-specific or non-specific processes are either already in clinical use or in development. In this review, we will introduce the pathological lesions of the AD brain, the related biomarkers, and discuss to what extent the respective biomarkers estimate the pathology determined at post-mortem histopathological analysis. It became evident that initial stages of Aβ plaque and p-τ pathology are not detected with the currently available biomarkers. Interestingly, p-τ pathology precedes Aβ deposition, especially in the beginning of the disease when biomarkers are unable to detect it. Later, Aβ takes the lead and accelerates p-τ pathology, fitting well with the known evolution of biomarker measures over time. Some co-pathologies still lack clinically established biomarkers today, such as TDP-43 pathology or cortical microinfarcts. In summary, specific biomarkers for AD-related pathologies allow accurate clinical diagnosis of AD based on pathobiological parameters. Although current biomarkers are excellent measures for the respective pathologies, they fail to detect initial stages of the disease for which post-mortem analysis of the brain is still required. Accordingly, neuropathological studies remain essential to understand disease development especially in early stages. Moreover, there is an urgent need for biomarkers reflecting co-pathologies, such as limbic predominant, age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy-related pathology, which is known to modify the disease by interacting with p-τ. Novel biomarker approaches such as extracellular vesicle-based assays and cryptic RNA/peptides may help to better detect these co-pathologies in the future.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的神经病理学特征是淀粉样β肽(Aβ)的细胞外沉积以及异常磷酸化tau(τ)蛋白(p-τ)的神经元内积聚。最常见的是,这些标志性病变伴有大脑中的其他共病,可能导致认知障碍,如血管病变、磷酸化反式激活反应DNA结合蛋白43(TDP-43)的神经元内积聚和/或α-突触核蛋白(αSyn)聚集体。为了评估患者中这些AD及共病的程度,已经开发了几种生物标志物。特定的示踪剂通过正电子发射断层扫描靶向并可视化Aβ斑块、p-τ和αSyn病理学或炎症。除了这些成像生物标志物外,反映AD特异性或非特异性过程的脑脊液和基于血液的生物标志物检测方法要么已经在临床应用,要么正在研发中。在本综述中,我们将介绍AD大脑的病理病变、相关生物标志物,并讨论各自的生物标志物在多大程度上能够评估死后组织病理学分析所确定的病理情况。很明显,目前可用的生物标志物无法检测到Aβ斑块和p-τ病理的初始阶段。有趣的是,p-τ病理先于Aβ沉积,尤其是在疾病初期,此时生物标志物无法检测到它。后来,Aβ占主导并加速p-τ病理,这与生物标志物测量随时间的已知演变非常吻合。如今,一些共病仍然缺乏临床确立的生物标志物,如TDP-43病理或皮质微梗死。总之,AD相关病理的特异性生物标志物能够基于病理生物学参数对AD进行准确的临床诊断。尽管目前的生物标志物对于各自的病理情况是很好的检测手段,但它们无法检测到疾病的初始阶段,对于这一阶段仍需要对大脑进行死后分析。因此,神经病理学研究对于理解疾病发展,尤其是早期阶段,仍然至关重要。此外,迫切需要反映共病的生物标志物,如边缘叶为主、年龄相关的TDP-43脑病相关病理,已知其通过与p-τ相互作用来改变疾病。基于细胞外囊泡的检测和隐秘RNA/肽等新型生物标志物方法可能有助于未来更好地检测这些共病。