Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
University of Birmingham, Rm 31, Fourth floor, Heritage Building, Academic Department of Surgery, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Trials. 2023 May 15;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07318-9.
Large-scale quality improvement interventions demand robust trial designs with flexibility for delivery in different contexts, particularly during a pandemic. We describe innovative features of a batched stepped wedge trial, ESCP sAfe Anastomosis proGramme in CoLorectal SurgEry (EAGLE), intended to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy, and reflect on lessons learned about the implementation of quality improvement programmes on an international scale.
Surgical units were recruited and randomised in batches to receive a hospital-level education intervention designed to reduce anastomotic leak, either before, during, or following data collection. All consecutive patients undergoing right colectomy were included. Online learning, patient risk stratification and an in-theatre checklist constituted the intervention. The study was powered to detect an absolute risk reduction of anastomotic leak from 8.1 to 5.6%. Statistical efficiency was optimised using an incomplete stepped wedge trial design and study batches analysed separately then meta-analysed to calculate the intervention effect. An established collaborative group helped nurture strong working relationships between units/countries and a prospectively designed process evaluation will enable evaluation of both the intervention and its implementation.
The batched trial design allowed sequential entry of clusters, targeted research training and proved to be robust to pandemic interruptions. Staggered start times in the incomplete stepped wedge design with long lead-in times can reduce motivation and engagement and require careful administration.
EAGLE's robust but flexible study design allowed completion of the study across globally distributed geographical locations in spite of the pandemic. The primary outcome analysed in conjunction with the process evaluation will ensure a rich understanding of the intervention and the effects of the study design.
National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network portfolio IRAS ID: 272,250. Health Research Authority approval 18 October 2019.
gov, identifier NCT04270721, protocol ID RG_19196.
大规模质量改进干预措施需要具有灵活性的强大试验设计,以便在不同的情况下进行交付,尤其是在大流行期间。我们描述了一种分批分步楔形试验的创新特点,即结肠直肠外科中安全吻合方案(EAGLE),旨在降低右结肠切除术后吻合口漏的风险,并反思在国际范围内实施质量改进计划的经验教训。
将外科单位按批次随机分组,接受旨在降低吻合口漏风险的医院级教育干预,干预可在数据收集之前、期间或之后进行。所有连续接受右结肠切除术的患者均纳入研究。在线学习、患者风险分层和术中检查表构成了干预措施。该研究旨在检测吻合口漏的绝对风险从 8.1%降至 5.6%。使用不完全分步楔形试验设计优化统计效率,并单独分析研究批次,然后进行荟萃分析以计算干预效果。一个成熟的合作小组帮助培养了单位/国家之间的牢固工作关系,并且前瞻性设计的过程评估将使干预措施及其实施情况得到评估。
分批试验设计允许连续进入集群、有针对性的研究培训,并被证明对大流行中断具有鲁棒性。不完全分步楔形设计中的交错启动时间和长的引入时间会降低动力和参与度,需要谨慎管理。
EAGLE 强大但灵活的研究设计使得尽管受到大流行的影响,仍能在全球分布的地理位置上完成研究。结合过程评估对主要结果进行分析,将确保对干预措施和研究设计效果的深入了解。
英国国家卫生研究院临床研究网络组合 IRAS 编号:272,250。健康研究管理局于 2019 年 10 月 18 日批准。
gov,标识符 NCT04270721,方案 ID RG_19196。