• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施一项阶梯式楔形群随机试验,以评估医院的活动能力计划。

Implementation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate a hospital mobility program.

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04764-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04764-7
PMID:33076997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7574435/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRT) are increasingly used to evaluate new clinical programs, yet there is limited guidance on practical aspects of applying this design. We report our early experiences conducting a SW-CRT to examine an inpatient mobility program (STRIDE) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We provide recommendations for future research using this design to evaluate clinical programs.

METHODS

Based on data from study records and reflections from the investigator team, we describe and assess the design and initial stages of a SW-CRT, from site recruitment to program launch in 8 VHA hospitals.

RESULTS

Site recruitment consisted of thirty 1-h conference calls with representatives from 22 individual VAs who expressed interest in implementing STRIDE. Of these, 8 hospitals were enrolled and randomly assigned in two stratified blocks (4 hospitals per block) to a STRIDE launch date. Block 1 randomization occurred in July 2017 with first STRIDE launch in December 2017; block 2 randomization occurred in April 2018 with first STRIDE launch in January 2019. The primary study outcome of discharge destination will be assessed using routinely collected data in the electronic health record (EHR). Within randomized blocks, two hospitals per sequence launched STRIDE approximately every 3 months with primary outcome assessment paused during the 3-month time period of program launch. All sites received 6-8 implementation support calls, according to a pre-specified schedule, from the time of recruitment to program launch, and all 8 sites successfully launched within their assigned 3-month window. Seven of the eight sites initially started with a limited roll out (for example on one ward) or modified version of STRIDE (for example, using existing staff to conduct walks until new positions were filled).

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should incorporate sufficient time for site recruitment and carefully consider the following to inform design of SW-CRTs to evaluate rollout of a new clinical program: (1) whether a blocked randomization fits study needs, (2) the amount of time and implementation support sites will need to start their programs, and (3) whether clinical programs are likely to include a "ramp-up" period. Successful execution of SW-CRT designs requires both adherence to rigorous design principles and also careful consideration of logistical requirements for timing of program roll out.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalsTrials.gov NCT03300336 . Prospectively registered on 3 October 2017.

摘要

背景

阶梯式楔形集群随机试验(SW-CRT)越来越多地用于评估新的临床方案,但在应用这种设计的实际方面,指导有限。我们报告了我们在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中进行 SW-CRT 以评估住院患者移动计划(STRIDE)的早期经验。我们为使用该设计评估临床方案的未来研究提供了建议。

方法

基于研究记录中的数据和调查员团队的反思,我们描述并评估了从 8 家 VHA 医院的站点招募到计划启动的 SW-CRT 的设计和初始阶段。

结果

站点招募包括 30 次 1 小时的电话会议,与 22 个对实施 STRIDE 感兴趣的个别 VA 代表进行了交流。其中,8 家医院被纳入并按 2 个分层块(每个块 4 家医院)随机分配 STRIDE 启动日期。第 1 块于 2017 年 7 月随机化,2017 年 12 月首次启动 STRIDE;第 2 块于 2018 年 4 月随机化,2019 年 1 月首次启动 STRIDE。使用电子健康记录(EHR)中常规收集的数据评估出院目的地的主要研究结果。在随机块内,每序列大约每 3 个月启动 2 家医院,在启动计划的 3 个月期间暂停主要结果评估。所有参与医院均按照预先规定的时间表,在招募至计划启动期间,共收到 6-8 次实施支持电话,并且所有 8 家医院均在其指定的 3 个月窗口内成功启动。8 家医院中的 7 家最初以有限的滚动方式(例如,在一个病房中)或 STRIDE 的修改版本(例如,在新职位填补之前,使用现有工作人员进行散步)启动。

结论

未来的研究应纳入足够的时间进行站点招募,并仔细考虑以下因素,以告知评估新临床方案推出的 SW-CRT 设计:(1) 随机分组是否符合研究需求;(2) 各站点启动其计划所需的时间和实施支持;(3) 临床方案是否可能包括“启动”期。SW-CRT 设计的成功执行既需要严格遵循设计原则,也需要仔细考虑计划推出的时间安排的后勤要求。

试验注册

ClinicalsTrials.gov NCT03300336。于 2017 年 10 月 3 日前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/80dfcb26de4d/13063_2020_4764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/b9ef8bb22903/13063_2020_4764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/38459e6c2c46/13063_2020_4764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/80dfcb26de4d/13063_2020_4764_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/b9ef8bb22903/13063_2020_4764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/38459e6c2c46/13063_2020_4764_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ffc/7574435/80dfcb26de4d/13063_2020_4764_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate a hospital mobility program.实施一项阶梯式楔形群随机试验,以评估医院的活动能力计划。
Trials. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04764-7.
2
Effects of Implementation of a Supervised Walking Program in Veterans Affairs Hospitals : A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial.实施监督步行计划对退伍军人事务医院的影响:一项阶梯式、群组随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jun;176(6):743-750. doi: 10.7326/M22-3679. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in low-resource settings.低资源环境下阶梯式整群随机临床试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Trials. 2019 Dec 19;20(Suppl 2):703. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3842-1.
4
Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial.支持医院步行计划实施的策略评估:一项III型有效性-实施混合试验方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00544-5.
5
Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice?关于现代方法的思考:何时阶乘群组随机临床试验是一个好的研究设计选择?
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):1043-1052. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa077.
6
Ethical and epistemic issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trials.实用型阶梯式群组随机临床试验设计与实施中的伦理和认识问题。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106703. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106703. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
Supporting teams to optimize function and independence in Veterans: a multi-study program and mixed methods protocol.支持退伍军人优化功能和独立性的团队:一项多研究计划和混合方法方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Apr 20;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0748-3.
8
HELP! Problems in executing a pragmatic, randomized, stepped wedge trial on the Hospital Elder Life Program to prevent delirium in older patients.求助!在实施一项关于医院老年生活项目以预防老年患者谵妄的实用、随机、阶梯式楔形试验中遇到的问题。
Trials. 2017 May 17;18(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1933-4.
9
Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.遵守 stepped-wedge 群随机对照试验设计和分析的关键建议:对 2016-2022 年发表的试验的回顾。
Clin Trials. 2024 Apr;21(2):199-210. doi: 10.1177/17407745231208397. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
10
Site-initiated adaptations in the implementation of an evidence-based inpatient walking program.基于证据的住院患者步行计划实施中的现场启动的适应性调整。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3210-3218. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19044. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational Characteristics of Hospitals Meeting STRIDE Program Adoption Benchmarks to Support Mobility for Hospitalized Persons.符合 STRIDE 计划采用基准以支持住院患者移动性的医院的组织特征。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241274030. doi: 10.1177/00469580241274030.
2
Modifications of the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials tool for appropriate use with Indigenous populations.适用于原住民人群的实用临床试验准备评估工具的修改。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 31;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02244-z.
3
The business case for hospital mobility programs in the veterans health care system: Results from multi-hospital implementation of the STRIDE program.

本文引用的文献

1
Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR.患者安全仪表板在供应商电子健康记录中的使用、感知可用性和实施障碍。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):34-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402756. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
2
Readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT): a model to assess the readiness of an intervention for testing in a pragmatic trial.实用临床试验准备度评估(RAPT):用于评估干预措施在实用临床试验中测试准备度的模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0794-9.
3
Stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment require new ways of thinking.
退伍军人医疗保健系统中医院流动项目的商业案例:STRIDE 项目在多家医院实施的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14307. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14307. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Effects of Implementation of a Supervised Walking Program in Veterans Affairs Hospitals : A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial.实施监督步行计划对退伍军人事务医院的影响:一项阶梯式、群组随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jun;176(6):743-750. doi: 10.7326/M22-3679. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Implementation of a batched stepped wedge trial evaluating a quality improvement intervention for surgical teams to reduce anastomotic leak after right colectomy.实施一项成批分步楔形试验,评估一项质量改进干预措施,以减少右结肠切除术后吻合口漏的发生。
Trials. 2023 May 15;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07318-9.
6
Ageing and physical resilience after health stressors.健康压力后衰老和身体恢复力。
Stress Health. 2023 Sep;39(S1):48-54. doi: 10.1002/smi.3241. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up.强化实施策略:制定基础和强化实施方法模型,以支持国家采用和扩大规模。
Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130.
8
Adapting to CONNECT: modifying a nursing home-based team-building intervention to improve hospital care team interactions, functioning, and implementation readiness.适应 CONNECT:修改基于养老院的团队建设干预措施,以改善医院护理团队的互动、功能和实施准备情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08270-1.
9
Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study.选择阶梯式群组随机临床试验设计用于实践改进研究之前的考虑因素。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 May-Jun;20(3):255-261. doi: 10.1370/afm.2810.
10
The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.成批分步楔形设计:一种针对群组招募延迟稳健的设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21.
阶梯式随机临床试验具有连续性招募的特点,这需要新的思路。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Early Mobility in the Hospital: Lessons Learned from the STRIDE Program.医院中的早期活动:从STRIDE项目中汲取的经验教训。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Dec;3(4). doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040061. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.当前在评估阶梯式楔形群组随机试验可行性中使用可行性研究的情况:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0658-3.
6
Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration.报告阶梯式楔形群随机试验:CONSORT 2010 声明的扩展,附有解释和说明。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 9;363:k1614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1614.
7
Supporting teams to optimize function and independence in Veterans: a multi-study program and mixed methods protocol.支持退伍军人优化功能和独立性的团队:一项多研究计划和混合方法方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Apr 20;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0748-3.
8
Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation.安大略省易脆弱老年人活动方案(MOVE ON)的研究结果:一项实施干预措施以增加患者活动能力的多地点中断时间序列评估。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):112-119. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx128.
9
The Tension Between Promoting Mobility and Preventing Falls in the Hospital.医院中促进患者活动能力与预防跌倒之间的矛盾
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):759-760. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0840.
10
Moving From Discovery to System-Wide Change: The Role of Research in a Learning Health Care System: Experience from Three Decades of Health Systems Research in the Veterans Health Administration.从发现到全系统变革:研究在学习型医疗保健系统中的作用:退伍军人健康管理局三十年来卫生系统研究的经验。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:467-487. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044255. Epub 2017 Jan 11.