• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯缝合术,联合或不联合近端胃迷走神经切断术治疗十二指肠溃疡穿孔。

Simple suture with or without proximal gastric vagotomy for perforated duodenal ulcer.

作者信息

Ceneviva R, de Castro e Silva Júnior O, Castelfranchi P L, Módena J L, Santos R F

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1986 Jun;73(6):427-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730604.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800730604
PMID:3719264
Abstract

To assess the results of proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) in the definitive treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers, a prospective study was carried out comparing PGV in association with omental patch suture (PGV + S) with the simple omental patch suture procedure (S). The PGV + S series consisted of 38 consecutive patients with perforated duodenal ulcer and the S series consisted of 38 survivors of a similar series of 41 consecutive patients. Surgical mortality was zero in the PGV + S series. The patients were followed up for 1 to 7 years. No cases of dumping or diarrhoea were observed. Thirty-three patients in the PGV + S series (87 per cent) were classified as Visick grade I and only two (5 per cent) as Visick grade IV. In contrast, 11 patients (29 per cent) were Visick grade I and 22 (58 per cent) were Visick grade IV in the S series. Recurrent ulcer was detected endoscopically in 58 per cent of the patients who had been treated with simple suture and in only 5 per cent after suture plus PGV. PGV is a safe operation with a negligible morbidity rate and with a significant rate of effective control of ulcer disease. Depending on the general condition of the patient and on the surgeon's skill, it appears preferable to treat not only the acute perforation but also the ulcer disease by PGV.

摘要

为评估近端胃迷走神经切断术(PGV)在十二指肠溃疡穿孔确定性治疗中的效果,开展了一项前瞻性研究,比较PGV联合网膜补片缝合术(PGV + S)与单纯网膜补片缝合术(S)。PGV + S组包括38例连续的十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者,S组包括来自41例连续患者的类似系列中的38例幸存者。PGV + S组的手术死亡率为零。对患者进行了1至7年的随访。未观察到倾倒或腹泻病例。PGV + S组中有33例患者(87%)被分类为Visick I级,只有2例(5%)为Visick IV级。相比之下,S组中有11例患者(29%)为Visick I级,22例(58%)为Visick IV级。在接受单纯缝合治疗的患者中,内镜检查发现复发性溃疡的比例为58%,而在缝合加PGV治疗后仅为5%。PGV是一种安全的手术,发病率可忽略不计,对溃疡病的有效控制率很高。根据患者的一般状况和外科医生的技术,似乎不仅应通过PGV治疗急性穿孔,还应治疗溃疡病。

相似文献

1
Simple suture with or without proximal gastric vagotomy for perforated duodenal ulcer.单纯缝合术,联合或不联合近端胃迷走神经切断术治疗十二指肠溃疡穿孔。
Br J Surg. 1986 Jun;73(6):427-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730604.
2
[Long-term curative effects of suture plus proximal gastric vagotomy or triad-therapy for duodenal ulcer with acute perforation].缝合加近端胃迷走神经切断术或三联疗法治疗十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔的长期疗效
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Sep;40(9):647-9.
3
Proximal gastric vagotomy. The preferred operation for perforations in acute duodenal ulcer.近端胃迷走神经切断术。急性十二指肠溃疡穿孔的首选手术方式。
Ann Surg. 1988 Aug;208(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198808000-00006.
4
Do perforated duodenal ulcers need an acid-decreasing surgical procedure now that omeprazole is available?既然有奥美拉唑,穿孔性十二指肠溃疡现在还需要进行减酸手术吗?
Surg Clin North Am. 1992 Apr;72(2):369-80. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45684-7.
5
Long term clinical results after proximal gastric vagotomy.近端胃迷走神经切断术后的长期临床结果。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Dec;169(6):488-94.
6
Proximal Gastric vagotomy without drainage for treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer.近端胃迷走神经切断术不附加引流术治疗十二指肠溃疡穿孔
Gastroenterology. 1982 Jul;83(1 Pt 2):179-83.
7
Anterior seromyotomy and posterior truncal vagotomy--technique and early results of a randomized trial.前侧浆膜肌层切开术与后侧迷走神经干切断术——一项随机试验的技术与早期结果
Neth J Surg. 1985 Jun;37(3):69-74.
8
Perforated pyloroduodenal ulcers. Long-term results with omental patch closure and parietal cell vagotomy.穿孔性幽门十二指肠溃疡。网膜修补术和壁细胞迷走神经切断术的长期效果。
Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):479-86; discussion 486-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00005.
9
Immediate definitive surgery for perforated duodenal ulcers: a prospective controlled trial.十二指肠溃疡穿孔的即时确定性手术:一项前瞻性对照试验。
Ann Surg. 1982 Sep;196(3):338-44. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198209000-00013.
10
Anterior lesser curve seromyotomy with posterior truncal vagotomy versus proximal gastric vagotomy.前小弯浆膜肌切开术联合后干迷走神经切断术与近端胃迷走神经切断术的比较
Br J Surg. 1988 Feb;75(2):121-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750211.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India.印度中部一所三级机构对年轻消化性溃疡穿孔患者的前瞻性临床内镜随访研究。
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2019 Jul-Dec;9(2):91-95. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1306.
2
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation: randomized controlled trial.根除幽门螺杆菌可预防十二指肠溃疡穿孔单纯缝合术后溃疡复发:随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2000 Feb;231(2):153-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00001.
3
Alternative laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcers.
穿孔性消化性溃疡的替代性腹腔镜治疗
Surg Endosc. 1994 Oct;8(10):1208-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00591052.
4
Perforated pyloroduodenal ulcers. Long-term results with omental patch closure and parietal cell vagotomy.穿孔性幽门十二指肠溃疡。网膜修补术和壁细胞迷走神经切断术的长期效果。
Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):479-86; discussion 486-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00005.
5
[Initial interventions in ulcer disease: indications--choice of procedure--results].[溃疡病的初始干预措施:适应证——手术选择——结果]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;372:173-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01297812.
6
Proximal gastric vagotomy. The preferred operation for perforations in acute duodenal ulcer.近端胃迷走神经切断术。急性十二指肠溃疡穿孔的首选手术方式。
Ann Surg. 1988 Aug;208(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198808000-00006.
7
Indications for parietal cell vagotomy without drainage in gastrointestinal surgery.胃肠手术中不进行引流的壁细胞迷走神经切断术的适应证。
Ann Surg. 1989 Jul;210(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198907000-00005.
8
Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy.近端胃迷走神经切断术的现状
Ann Surg. 1989 Feb;209(2):131-48. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198902000-00001.
9
Generalized peritonitis in India--the tropical spectrum.印度的弥漫性腹膜炎——热带地区的疾病谱
Jpn J Surg. 1991 May;21(3):272-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02470946.