• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与亚胺培南-雷利巴坦对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株活性的比较。

Comparison of Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

机构信息

Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Heath Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0093223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00932-23. Epub 2023 May 18.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.00932-23
PMID:37199669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10269746/
Abstract

The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant ( = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase . Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with "difficult-to-treat" resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa.

摘要

新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂合剂在头孢他啶不敏感(CAZ-NS)和亚胺培南不敏感(IPM-NS)铜绿假单胞菌中的作用尚未完全阐明。本研究评估了新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂合剂对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的活性,确定了阿维巴坦如何恢复头孢他啶的活性,并比较了头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和亚胺培南-雷巴坦(IMR)对产 KPC 铜绿假单胞菌的活性。在中国 11 家医院的 596 株铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株中,发现 CZA、IMR 和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦(88.9%至 89.8%)对 CZA、IMR 和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦具有相似的高敏感性,且对头孢他啶的敏感性高于亚胺培南(73.5%比 63.1%)。对于 CAZ-NS 和 IPM-NS 分离株,CZA、头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦和 IMR 的敏感性分别为 61.5%(75/122)、54.9%(67/122)和 51.6%(63/122)。对于 CAZ-NS、IPM-NS 但 CZA 敏感的分离株,34.7%(26/75)携带以 KPC-2 为主的获得性β-内酰胺酶( = 19),45.3%(34/75)表现出染色体β-内酰胺酶的过度表达。在 22 株仅携带 KPC-2 碳青霉烯酶的分离株中,CZA 和 IMR 的敏感性分别为 86.4%(19/22)和 9.1%(2/22)。值得注意的是,IMR 不敏感的 95%(19/20)分离株均存在基因的失活突变。总之,CZA、头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦和 IMR 对铜绿假单胞菌具有高活性,CZA 对 CAZ-NS 和 IPM-NS 分离株以及产 KPC 铜绿假单胞菌的活性均优于 IMR。阿维巴坦克服了 KPC-2 酶和过度表达的 AmpC 引起的头孢他啶耐药性。

全球抗菌药物耐药性的出现带来了特别的挑战,因此提出了“难治疗”铜绿假单胞菌(DTR-P. aeruginosa)的概念。在这里,铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对三种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂合剂 CZA、IMR 和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦高度敏感。KPC-2 酶和功能失调的孔蛋白 OprD 的组合导致铜绿假单胞菌对 IMR 耐药,CZA 在对抗产 KPC-2 的铜绿假单胞菌方面比 IMR 更有效。CZA 对 CAZ-NS 和 IPM-NS 铜绿假单胞菌也表现出良好的活性,主要通过抑制 KPC-2 酶和过度产生 AmpC,支持 CZA 在治疗 DTR-P. aeruginosa 引起的感染中的临床应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6908/10269746/1a702419f410/spectrum.00932-23-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6908/10269746/f5750359d687/spectrum.00932-23-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6908/10269746/1a702419f410/spectrum.00932-23-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6908/10269746/f5750359d687/spectrum.00932-23-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6908/10269746/1a702419f410/spectrum.00932-23-f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与亚胺培南-雷利巴坦对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株活性的比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0093223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00932-23. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Imipenem-Relebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Collected in United States Hospitals According to Results from the SMART Surveillance Program, 2018 to 2020.根据 2018 年至 2020 年 SMART 监测项目的结果,比较头孢洛扎他唑巴坦、亚胺培南-雷巴他啶、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和其他对照药物对美国医院分离的铜绿假单胞菌的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 May 17;66(5):e0018922. doi: 10.1128/aac.00189-22. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Synergistic Activity of Imipenem in Combination with Ceftazidime/Avibactam or Avibactam against Non-MBL-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.亚胺培南与头孢他啶/阿维巴坦或阿维巴坦联合对非产金属β-内酰胺酶广泛耐药铜绿假单胞菌的协同作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0274021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02740-21. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Comparative activity of newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US medical centres (2020-2021).新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对来自美国医疗中心的铜绿假单胞菌分离株的比较活性(2020 - 2021年)
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Apr;61(4):106744. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106744. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
5
Activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.头孢地尔肟、亚胺培南/雷巴他定、头孢吡肟/他唑巴坦和头孢吡肟/齐多夫定对头孢他啶/他唑巴坦和头孢噻肟/阿维巴坦耐药铜绿假单胞菌的活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Sep 30;77(10):2809-2815. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac241.
6
Simultaneous and divergent evolution of resistance to cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and imipenem/relebactam following ceftazidime/avibactam treatment of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染后,对头孢菌素/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合和亚胺培南/雷巴他定的耐药性同时发生并出现分歧。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 May 3;78(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad062.
7
Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and other new β-lactams in clinical isolates: a multi-center surveillance study.临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦及其他新型β-内酰胺类药物的耐药性:一项多中心监测研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0426623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04266-23. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
Molecular characterization of clinically isolated with varying resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam collected as a part of the ATLAS global surveillance program from 2020 to 2021.2020 年至 2021 年期间,作为 ATLAS 全球监测计划的一部分收集了具有不同头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦耐药性的临床分离株,并对其进行了分子特征分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Oct 8;68(10):e0067024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00670-24. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
9
Antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with skin and soft tissue infections.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南/雷巴坦、美罗培南/沃巴坦和对照药物对皮肤软组织感染患者分离的铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌活性。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:279-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
10
Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Cefiderocol against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Recovered at a German University Hospital.头孢洛扎他唑巴坦、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔在德国一所大学医院分离的多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌中的抗菌活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0169722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01697-22. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of sensititre microplates, disc diffusion, and MTS gradient strips with broth microdilution.碳青霉烯类耐药铜绿假单胞菌中亚胺培南-瑞来巴坦药敏试验的评估:药敏定量板、纸片扩散法和MTS梯度条带与肉汤微量稀释法的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1231-1237. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05058-z. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.革兰氏阴性菌对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性的全球趋势:系统评价与荟萃分析
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025 Feb 11;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01518-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Molecular Epidemiology of Intestinal Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.肠碳青霉烯耐药铜绿假单胞菌的流行情况、危险因素和分子流行病学。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0134421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01344-21. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Geographic Patterns of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Asia-Pacific Region: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) Program, 2015-2019.亚太地区耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌的地理分布模式:来自 2015-2019 年抗菌药物测试领导和监测(ATLAS)计划的结果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0200021. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02000-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
BANNMDA: a computational model for predicting potential microbe-drug associations based on bilinear attention networks and nuclear norm minimization.
BANNMDA:一种基于双线性注意力网络和核范数最小化预测潜在微生物-药物关联的计算模型。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 22;15:1497886. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1497886. eCollection 2024.
4
Role of Relebactam in the Antibiotic Resistance Acquisition in : In Vitro Study.瑞来巴坦在抗生素耐药性获得中的作用:体外研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Nov 11;12(11):1619. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12111619.
5
Clinical pharmacists' involvement in carbapenem antibiotics management at Wenzhou Integrated Hospital.临床药师参与温州中西医结合医院碳青霉烯类抗生素管理工作。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Oct 26;11(30):7302-7308. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i30.7302.
Emergence of Ceftazidime- and Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China.
中国产碳青霉烯酶的铜绿假单胞菌中对头孢他啶和阿维巴坦耐药的肺炎克雷伯菌的出现。
mSystems. 2021 Dec 21;6(6):e0078721. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00787-21. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation.交互式生命树 (iTOL) v5:一个用于显示和注释系统发育树的在线工具。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W293-W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301.
5
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).美国传染病学会关于治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科(ESBL-E)、碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)和治疗困难的耐药铜绿假单胞菌(DTR-P. aeruginosa)的指导意见。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):1109-1116. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab295.
6
An IncP-2 plasmid sublineage associated with dissemination of among carbapenem-resistant .一种与碳青霉烯类耐药菌中传播有关的 IncP-2 质粒亚系。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021 Dec;10(1):442-449. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1894903.
7
Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam tested against contemporary (2015-2017) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from a global surveillance programme.头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对全球监测项目中 2015-2017 年分离的当代铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌活性。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Jun;21:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study.头孢他啶、碳青霉烯类或哌拉西林他唑巴坦作为铜绿假单胞菌菌血症的单一确定性治疗:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 23;70(11):2270-2280. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz668.
9
Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at US Emerging Infections Program Sites, 2015.美国新发传染病项目点的耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌,2015 年。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;25(7):1281-1288. doi: 10.3201/eid2507.181200.
10
Spanish nationwide survey on Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and epidemiology.西班牙全国范围内的铜绿假单胞菌抗菌药物耐药机制和流行病学调查。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jul 1;74(7):1825-1835. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz147.