Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0286067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286067. eCollection 2023.
Correlation does not imply causation, but this does not necessarily stop people from drawing causal inferences from correlational statements. We show that people do in fact infer causality from statements of association, under minimal conditions. In Study 1, participants interpreted statements of the form "X is associated with Y" to imply that Y causes X. In Studies 2 and 3, participants interpreted statements of the form "X is associated with an increased risk of Y" to imply that X causes Y. Thus, even the most orthodox correlational language can give rise to causal inferences.
相关关系并不意味着因果关系,但这并不能阻止人们从相关陈述中得出因果推断。我们表明,在最小条件下,人们实际上确实会从关联陈述中推断出因果关系。在研究 1 中,参与者将“X 与 Y 相关”的陈述解释为 Y 导致 X。在研究 2 和 3 中,参与者将“X 与 Y 的风险增加相关”的陈述解释为 X 导致 Y。因此,即使是最正统的相关语言也可能导致因果推断。