• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低强度激光疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的效果比较。

Comparison of effects of low level laser therapy and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

作者信息

Yetişir Ayşegül, Kozanoğlu Erkan, Kelle Bayram

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct 27;69(1):8-14. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.9923. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2023.9923
PMID:37201000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10186012/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to compare low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed with 56 patients (6 males, 50 females; mean age: 44.7±10.1 years; range, 18 to 65 years) between January 2015 and March 2016. The patients were equally divided into two groups: Group 1, comprising patients who underwent a one-time local corticosteroid injection into the heel by the same physician, and Group 2, including patients who had gallium arsenide laser therapy at a wavelength of 904 nm lasting 10 sessions. Evaluations were done at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and two weeks, one month, and three months after the post-treatment evaluation. The post-treatment evaluation was accepted as the 10 day after the injection in Group 1 and as the time after the last session of the laser treatment in Group 2. Each visit was compared with the previous visit for within-group analysis. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Heel Tenderness Index (HTI), and Foot Function Index (FFI) were assessed.

RESULTS

Pain scores in Group 1 and Group 2 were not associated with statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Within-groups analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences concerning VAS subgroups (p <0.05), except for Group 2's resting VAS values (p=0.159). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in the means of FFI scores (p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed regarding within-group analyses for all subscores (p <0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for all visits regarding HTI scores (p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were found between baseline and the first after-treatment visit in all groups (p <0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in the first (p=0.020) and third (p=0.010) months compared to the one-week follow-up in Group 2 regarding HTI scores.

CONCLUSION

Both LLLT and local corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis have positive effects for three months after treatment. However, LLLT is more effective than local corticosteroid injection at the end of the third month in local tenderness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较低强度激光疗法(LLLT)和局部注射皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎的效果。

患者与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2016年3月期间的56例患者(6例男性,50例女性;平均年龄:44.7±10.1岁;年龄范围18至65岁)。患者被平均分为两组:第1组,由同一位医生对足跟进行一次性局部皮质类固醇注射的患者组成;第2组,包括接受波长为904nm的砷化镓激光治疗,共10次疗程的患者。在治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后评估的两周、一个月和三个月进行评估。第1组的治疗后评估为注射后10天,第2组的治疗后评估为最后一次激光治疗后的时间。每次就诊时与前一次就诊进行组内分析比较。评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、足跟压痛指数(HTI)和足部功能指数(FFI)。

结果

第1组和第2组的疼痛评分无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。组内分析显示,除第2组静息VAS值外(p = 0.159),VAS亚组存在统计学显著差异(p <0.05)。两组间FFI评分均值无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。所有亚评分的组内分析均观察到统计学显著差异(p <0.001)。两组间所有就诊时的HTI评分均无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。所有组在基线和首次治疗后就诊之间均观察到统计学显著差异(p <0.05)。与第2组一周随访相比,在第1个月(p = 0.020)和第3个月(p = 0.010)的HTI评分存在统计学显著差异。

结论

LLLT和局部注射皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎在治疗后三个月均有积极效果。然而,在第三个月末,LLLT在局部压痛方面比局部注射皮质类固醇更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of effects of low level laser therapy and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.低强度激光疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的效果比较。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct 27;69(1):8-14. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.9923. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Local Corticosteroid Injection Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis.桡侧体外冲击波疗法与超声引导下局部注射皮质类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 May;107(3):192-199. doi: 10.7547/14-114.
3
Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部注射皮质类固醇治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的单盲随机临床试验
Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1722-31. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw113. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes of Laser Therapy, Ultrasound Therapy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.激光治疗、超声治疗和体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的磁共振成像及临床疗效:一项随机对照试验
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jul-Aug;56(4):762-767. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.02.013.
5
The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial.高强度与低强度激光疗法对足底筋膜炎的治疗效果:一项随机临床试验
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Aug;33(6):1363-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2497-6. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
6
Is Platelet-rich Plasma Injection more Effective than Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis in Achieving Long-term Relief?在实现长期缓解方面,富血小板血浆注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎是否比类固醇注射更有效?
Malays Orthop J. 2019 Nov;13(3):8-14. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1911.002.
7
A Prospective Study Comparing the Efficacy of Local Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Methylprednisolone in Plantar Fasciitis.一项比较局部注射富血小板血浆(PRP)与甲基强的松龙治疗足底筋膜炎疗效的前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2022 May 31;14(5):e25523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25523. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Combination Therapy Versus Exercise and Orthotic Support in the Management of Pain in Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.联合治疗与运动及矫形支具对足底筋膜炎疼痛的管理效果比较:一项随机对照试验
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Apr;39(4):406-414. doi: 10.1177/1071100717747590. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Autologous whole blood versus corticosteroid local injection in treatment of plantar fasciitis: A randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial.自体全血与皮质类固醇局部注射治疗足底筋膜炎:一项随机对照多中心临床试验。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;36(3):661-669. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3484-6. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
10
Effectiveness of Four Different Treatment Modalities in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis During a 36-Month Follow-Up Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.四种不同治疗方式在36个月随访期内治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Sep-Oct;57(5):913-918. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.03.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapies in Calcaneal Spurs.体外冲击波和脉冲电磁场疗法治疗跟骨骨刺的疗效。
Arch Iran Med. 2023 Nov 1;26(11):642-646. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.94.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized comparative trial of corticosteroid phonophoresis, local corticosteroid injection, and low-level laser in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.皮质类固醇离子导入疗法、局部皮质类固醇注射及低强度激光治疗腕管综合征的随机对照试验
Laser Ther. 2020 Jul 17;29(1):11-17. doi: 10.5978/islsm.20-OR-01.
2
Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低强度激光治疗足底筋膜炎的临床疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14088. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014088.
3
Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.体外冲击波、超声、低强度激光治疗、无创交互式神经刺激和脉冲射频治疗足底筋膜炎的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12819. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012819.
4
Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖皮质激素注射与非侵入性治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 5;8(1):4033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22402-w.
5
Low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.低强度激光治疗足底筋膜炎:一项随机对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Jul;33(5):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2423-3. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
6
Comparison of dry needling and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.干针疗法与类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的比较:一项单盲随机临床试验
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3681-1. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for plantar fasciitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.富血小板血浆治疗足底筋膜炎:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(44):e8475. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008475.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciopathy.富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2017 Jun;41(6):1169-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3470-x. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Low-level laser and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a controlled clinical trial.低强度激光与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗肩峰下撞击综合征:一项对照临床试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Aug;28(8):762-771. doi: 10.1177/0269215514520772. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
Low-level laser therapy with a wrist splint to treat carpal tunnel syndrome: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用腕部夹板的低强度激光疗法治疗腕管综合征:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 May;29(3):1279-87. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1527-2. Epub 2014 Jan 30.