• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足月引产时引产方式和分娩方式与产妇满意度的关系:一项观察性研究。

Role of mode of induction and delivery and women's satisfaction after induction of labour at term: An observational study.

机构信息

Midwifery school, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, via Manfredo Fanti 6, 20122 Milan, Italy; SITRA Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department 3, Sant' Anna Hospital, Corso Spezia 60, 10126 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.012
Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the impact of different modalities of induction of labour (IOL) and delivery on levels of woman' satisfaction. All women aged 18 years or older, who underwent IOL for at-term pregnancy (≥41 weeks of gestation) in randomly selected days during the study period in 6 participating centres were eligible for the study. The questionnaire investigated women's opinion regarding information about induction, pain control, length of induction, their experience about induction, labour and delivery and their attitude towards induction in a subsequent pregnancy. Women were also asked to fill in the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). A total of 300 women entered the study. The answer to the question about a "positive attitude towards induction in a subsequent pregnancy was "absolutely yes" or "yes" respectively in the 77.8%, 52.8% and 48.6% of women who were induced with oral drugs, vaginal drugs and Cook balloon (heterogeneity chi-square p = 0.05). The corresponding values for women who delivered vaginally or by caesarean section (CS) were 63.3% and 36.4% (chi-square p = 0.0009). The mean BSS-R total score was higher among women who underwent IOL with oral drugs than with vaginal drugs (p < 0.0001) or Cook Balloon (p < 0.0001), and among women who delivered vaginally than in those who delivered by CS (p < 0.0001). Women were asked "What do you think is important for a method of induction?": 47.3% (95% CI 41.7%-53.0%) of women answered that "should make the induction as painless as possible", 47.0% (95% CI 41.4%-52.7%) "should induce labour quickly", 44.3% (95% CI 38.8%-50.0%) "should be safe for baby". This study showed that vaginal delivery was associated with a higher rate of satisfaction among induced women. Considering mode of induction, oral drugs were associated with a higher level of satisfaction. Control of pain and quick induction were the most appreciated characteristics.

摘要

这项横断面研究旨在评估不同引产方式(IOL)和分娩方式对产妇满意度的影响。所有年龄在 18 岁及以上的产妇,在研究期间的随机选择天数内在 6 个参与中心进行了足月妊娠(≥41 周妊娠)的 IOL,均符合研究条件。问卷调查了产妇对引产相关信息、疼痛控制、引产时间、引产经历、分娩经历以及对后续妊娠引产态度的看法。产妇还被要求填写意大利版修订后的分娩满意度量表(BSS-R)。共有 300 名产妇入组研究。在“对后续妊娠的引产有积极态度”这一问题的回答中,分别有 77.8%、52.8%和 48.6%的口服药物、阴道药物和库克气球引产的产妇回答“完全是”或“是”(异质性卡方检验,p=0.05)。而阴道分娩或剖宫产(CS)的产妇相应的比例为 63.3%和 36.4%(卡方检验,p=0.0009)。口服药物引产的产妇 BSS-R 总分高于阴道药物(p<0.0001)或库克气球(p<0.0001)引产的产妇,而阴道分娩的产妇 BSS-R 总分高于 CS 分娩的产妇(p<0.0001)。产妇被问到“您认为引产方法的哪些方面重要?”47.3%(95%可信区间 41.7%-53.0%)的产妇回答“应该尽可能减轻引产的痛苦”,47.0%(95%可信区间 41.4%-52.7%)的产妇回答“应该快速引产”,44.3%(95%可信区间 38.8%-50.0%)的产妇回答“应该对宝宝安全”。本研究表明,阴道分娩与诱导产妇的更高满意度相关。考虑到引产方式,口服药物与更高的满意度相关。控制疼痛和快速引产是最受产妇赞赏的特点。

相似文献

1
Role of mode of induction and delivery and women's satisfaction after induction of labour at term: An observational study.足月引产时引产方式和分娩方式与产妇满意度的关系:一项观察性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 13.
2
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
3
Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure.引产:成功与失败的临床预测因素
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):352-358. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1361388. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin.剖宫产术后使用球囊导管或缩宫素引产的安全性和有效性。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Nov 8;147:w14532. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14532. eCollection 2017.
5
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
Dissatisfaction of women with induction of labour according to parity: Results of a population-based cohort study.根据产次的不同,女性对引产的不满:一项基于人群的队列研究结果。
Midwifery. 2020 May;84:102663. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102663. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
7
Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.女性对双球囊装置作为引产的附加方法的接受程度。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 May;168(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
8
Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour--a questionnaire-based study.女性对引产的认知、期望与满意度——一项基于问卷调查的研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Nov 1;123(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004.
9
Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.初产妇无并发症引产术后剖宫产——基于人群的42950例分娩横断面分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 27;16:92. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0869-0.
10
Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.米索前列醇用于足月引产:一种比地诺前列酮阴道凝胶更有效的药物。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):793-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal satisfaction and birth experiences after elective induction vs. spontaneous onset in late-term pregnancy: a register-based study.晚期妊娠选择性引产与自然发动后的产妇满意度及分娩体验:一项基于登记的研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07818-3.
2
Clinical comparison of vaginal misoprostol combined with a foley balloon versus vaginal misoprostol alone for inducing labor: a prospective cohort study.阴道米索前列醇联合 Foley 球囊与单纯阴道米索前列醇引产的临床比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07375-9.