• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管成形术研究(BASIS):一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照试验的方案。

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Feb 27;9(1):66-74. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002288.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2022-002288
PMID:37202152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The superiority of balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (AMM) to AMM alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS) on efficacy and safety profiles still lacks evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

AIM

To demonstrate the design of an RCT on balloon angioplasty plus AMM for sICAS.

DESIGN

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point trial to investigate whether balloon angioplasty plus AMM could improve clinical outcome compared with AMM alone in patients with sICAS. Patients eligible in BASIS were 35-80 years old, with a recent transient ischaemic attack within the past 90 days or ischaemic stroke between 14 days and 90 days prior to enrolment due to severe atherosclerotic stenosis (70%-99%) of a major intracranial artery. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive balloon angioplasty plus AMM or AMM alone at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive identical AMM, including standard dual antiplatelet therapy for 90 days followed by long-term single antiplatelet therapy, intensive risk factor management and life-style modification. All participants will be followed up for 3 years.

STUDY OUTCOMES

Stroke or death in the next 30 days after enrolment or after balloon angioplasty procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up, or any ischaemic stroke or revascularisation from the qualifying artery after 30 days but before 12 months of enrolment, is the primary outcome.

DISCUSSION

BASIS trail is the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty plus AMM to AMM alone in sICAS patients, which may provide an alternative perspective for treating sICAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03703635; https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

摘要

背景

对于症状性颅内动脉狭窄(sICAS),球囊血管成形术联合强化药物治疗(AMM)在疗效和安全性方面优于 AMM 单独治疗,但仍缺乏来自随机对照试验(RCT)的证据。

目的

展示一项关于球囊血管成形术联合 AMM 治疗 sICAS 的 RCT 设计。

设计

球囊血管成形术治疗症状性颅内动脉狭窄(BASIS)试验是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点试验,旨在研究球囊血管成形术联合 AMM 是否能改善 sICAS 患者的临床结局,与 AMM 单独治疗相比。BASIS 试验纳入的患者年龄在 35-80 岁之间,在入组前 90 天内有近期短暂性脑缺血发作或 14-90 天内有缺血性卒中,由于颅内主要动脉严重粥样硬化性狭窄(70%-99%)而导致。符合条件的患者被随机分配接受球囊血管成形术联合 AMM 或 AMM 单独治疗,比例为 1:1。两组均接受相同的 AMM,包括标准双联抗血小板治疗 90 天,随后长期单联抗血小板治疗、强化危险因素管理和生活方式改变。所有参与者将接受 3 年的随访。

研究结果

入组后 30 天内或 qualifying 病变球囊血管成形术后 30 天内发生卒中或死亡,或入组后 30 天至 12 个月内 qualifying 动脉发生任何缺血性卒中或血运重建,是主要结局。

讨论

BASIS 试验是第一项比较球囊血管成形术联合 AMM 与 AMM 单独治疗 sICAS 患者疗效和安全性的 RCT,可能为治疗 sICAS 提供另一种视角。

试验注册编号

NCT03703635;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。

临床试验

NCT03703635。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84fa/10956109/c2df7b4a2001/svn-2022-002288f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84fa/10956109/c2df7b4a2001/svn-2022-002288f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84fa/10956109/c2df7b4a2001/svn-2022-002288f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管成形术研究(BASIS):一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照试验的方案。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Feb 27;9(1):66-74. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002288.
2
Balloon Angioplasty vs Medical Management for Intracranial Artery Stenosis: The BASIS Randomized Clinical Trial.球囊血管成形术与药物治疗颅内动脉狭窄的比较:BASIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Oct 1;332(13):1059-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.12829.
3
Effect of Stenting Plus Medical Therapy vs Medical Therapy Alone on Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: The CASSISS Randomized Clinical Trial.支架置入联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中和死亡风险的影响:CASSISS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12000.
4
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
5
Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.症状性颅内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗与药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 11;8(8):CD013267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013267.pub2.
6
Randomised study of bailout intracranial angioplasty following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion (ANGEL-REBOOT): protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.急性大血管闭塞取栓后补救性颅内血管成形术的随机研究(ANGEL-REBOOT):一项多中心随机对照试验的方案。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Apr 30;9(2):181-188. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002433.
7
Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.症状性颅内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗与药物治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 3;2(2):CD013267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013267.pub3.
8
DRug-coated Balloon for Endovascular treatment of sYmptOmatic intracraNial stenotic Disease (DR. BEYOND): the protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.药物涂层球囊用于症状性颅内狭窄疾病的血管内治疗(DR. BEYOND):一项多中心随机试验方案
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Apr 29;10(2):e003259. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003259.
9
Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild-Moderate Ischemic Stroke (ATAMIS): a parallel, randomised, open-label, multicentre, prospective study.急性轻中度缺血性脑卒中的抗血小板治疗(ATAMIS):一项平行、随机、开放标签、多中心、前瞻性研究。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Sep 23;3(4):263-267. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000148. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.中国症状性颅内重度狭窄血管成形术和支架置入术(CASSISS):一项在中国开展的新的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581778. Epub 2015 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovascular therapy versus best medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内治疗与最佳药物治疗对症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Mar 13:23969873251324863. doi: 10.1177/23969873251324863.
2
The Future of Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病血管内治疗的未来
Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024 Nov;4(6). doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001053. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis with different qualifying arteries: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Stenting Plus Medical Therapy vs Medical Therapy Alone on Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: The CASSISS Randomized Clinical Trial.支架置入联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中和死亡风险的影响:CASSISS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12000.
2
Endovascular Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.症状性颅内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Transl Stroke Res. 2022 Oct;13(5):676-685. doi: 10.1007/s12975-022-00996-8. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
3
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment.
针对具有不同合格动脉的症状性颅内动脉狭窄的支架置入术:一项预先计划的汇总个体患者数据分析。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):422-430. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003532.
4
Balloon angiopLasty for intracranial Atherosclerotic minor Stroke/TIA (BLAST): study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study.颅内动脉粥样硬化性轻度卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作的球囊血管成形术(BLAST):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究的研究方案
Front Neurol. 2024 May 24;15:1385546. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1385546. eCollection 2024.
颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄:危险因素、诊断与治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Apr;21(4):355-368. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00376-8. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Medical and Endovascular Treatments for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的药物和血管内治疗:网状 Meta 分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2023 Feb;14(1):83-93. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00957-7. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of the management of high-risk population.中国卒中学会脑血管病临床管理指南:执行摘要及 2019 年高危人群管理更新
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Sep;5(3):270-278. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000385. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Submaximal angioplasty in the treatment of patients with symptomatic ICAD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者的次全血管成形术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):380-385. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015451. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Submaximal Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Peri-Procedural and Long-Term Risk.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病的次最大血管成形术:围手术期和长期风险的荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):755-762. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz337.
8
Hemodynamic Markers in the Anterior Circulation as Predictors of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis.前循环血流动力学标志物作为颅内狭窄患者复发性卒中的预测指标
Stroke. 2019 Jan;50(1):143-147. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020840. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study.中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:一项多中心注册研究的 1 年结果。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 May 7;3(3):176-184. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000137. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Intracranial atherosclerosis and dementia: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.颅内动脉粥样硬化与痴呆:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究
Neurology. 2017 Apr 18;88(16):1556-1563. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003837. Epub 2017 Mar 22.