• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于指南的算法推荐与妇科肿瘤多学科团队建议

Guideline-Based Algorithmic Recommendations Versus Multidisciplinary Team Advice for Gynecologic Oncology.

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:605-606. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230215.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI230215
PMID:37203758
Abstract

Evidence-based clinical decision making in oncology is challenging. Multi-disciplinary team (MDTs) meetings are organized to consider different diagnostic and treatment options. MDT advice are often based on clinical practice guideline recommendations which can be extensive and ambiguous, making it difficult to implement in clinical practice. To address this issue, guideline-based algorithms have been developed. These are applicable in clinical practice and enable accurate guideline adherence evaluation. This ongoing study aims to determine the optimal decision-making approach for different subpopulations of patients with high-incidence gynecological cancers.

摘要

肿瘤学中基于证据的临床决策具有挑战性。多学科团队 (MDT) 会议的组织目的是考虑不同的诊断和治疗方案。MDT 建议通常基于临床实践指南建议,这些建议可能非常广泛且模棱两可,因此在临床实践中难以实施。为了解决这个问题,已经开发出了基于指南的算法。这些算法在临床实践中适用,并能够实现对指南的准确遵守评估。本正在进行的研究旨在确定不同高发妇科癌症患者亚群的最佳决策方法。

相似文献

1
Guideline-Based Algorithmic Recommendations Versus Multidisciplinary Team Advice for Gynecologic Oncology.基于指南的算法推荐与妇科肿瘤多学科团队建议
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:605-606. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230215.
2
"No decision about me without me" in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study.癌症多学科团队会议背景下的“没有我参与就没有关于我的决定”:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2.
3
Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change.癌症多学科团队会议的实际情况:一项多机构定量调查的结果及对政策变革的启示。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Using guideline-based clinical decision support in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: A prospective, multicenter concordance study.在肿瘤多学科团队会议中使用基于指南的临床决策支持:一项前瞻性、多中心一致性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Mar 19;34(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac007.
5
[Evaluation of multidisciplinary team meeting; the example of gynecological mammary cancers in a tertiary referral center in Morocco].[多学科团队会议评估;以摩洛哥一家三级转诊中心的妇科乳腺癌为例]
Bull Cancer. 2017 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):644-651. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.考虑合并症在多学科癌症团队会议中的治疗决策中的作用:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1325-32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv025. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
[Multidisciplinary team meetings in cancerology: setting priorities for improvement].[肿瘤学中的多学科团队会议:确定改进的优先事项]
Bull Cancer. 2011 Oct;98(9):989-98. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1428.
8
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?英国多学科癌症团队中肿瘤学家的作用:团队领导的未开发资源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
9
Decision making in surgical oncology.外科肿瘤学决策。
Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;20(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
10
Two-year experience of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) outcomes for brain metastases in a tertiary neuro-oncology centre.三级神经肿瘤中心脑转移瘤多学科团队(MDT)治疗效果的两年经验
Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;32(1):53-60. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1368449. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence and reality: an observational study on pharmacological outcomes in advanced head and neck tumors.证据与现实:一项关于晚期头颈部肿瘤药物治疗结果的观察性研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 25;15:1598125. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1598125. eCollection 2025.