• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 20 孕周起的胎儿生长轨迹对低危人群严重不良围生期结局的预测价值:IRIS 研究的二次分析。

Predictive value of fetal growth trajectory from 20 weeks of gestation onwards for severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: secondary analysis of IRIS study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;62(6):796-804. doi: 10.1002/uog.26250.

DOI:10.1002/uog.26250
PMID:37204332
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The placental dysfunction underlying fetal growth restriction (FGR) may result in severe adverse perinatal outcome (SAPO) related to fetal hypoxia. Traditionally, the diagnostic criteria for FGR have been based on fetal size, an approach that is inherently flawed because it often results in either over- or underdiagnosis. The anomaly ultrasound scan at 20 weeks' gestation may be an appropriate time at which to set a benchmark for growth potential of the individual fetus. We hypothesized that the fetal growth trajectory from that point onwards may be informative regarding third-trimester placental dysfunction. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value for SAPO of a slow fetal growth trajectory between 18 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks and 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation in a large, low-risk population.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc data analysis of the IUGR Risk Selection (IRIS) study, a Dutch nationwide cluster-randomized trial assessing the (cost-)effectiveness of routine third-trimester sonography in reducing SAPO. In the current analysis, for the first ultrasound examination we used ultrasound data from the routine anomaly scan at 18 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks' gestation, and for the second we used data from an ultrasound examination performed between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Using multilevel logistic regression, we analyzed whether SAPO was predicted by a slow fetal growth trajectory, which was defined as a decline in abdominal circumference (AC) and/or estimated fetal weight (EFW) of more than 20 percentiles or more than 50 percentiles or as an AC growth velocity (ACGV) < 10 percentile (p10). In addition, we analyzed the combination of these indicators of slow fetal growth with small-for-gestational age (SGA) (AC or EFW < p10) and severe SGA (AC/EFW < 3 percentile) at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

Our sample included the data of 6296 low-risk singleton pregnancies, among which 82 (1.3%) newborns experienced at least one SAPO. Standalone declines in AC or EFW of > 20 or > 50 percentiles or ACGV < p10 were not associated with increased odds of SAPO. EFW < p10 between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation combined with a decline in EFW of > 20 percentiles was associated with an increased rate of SAPO. The combination of AC or EFW < p10 between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation with ACGV < p10 was also associated with increased odds of SAPO. The odds ratios of these associations were higher if the neonate was SGA at birth.

CONCLUSIONS

In a low-risk population, a slow fetal growth trajectory as a standalone criterion does not distinguish adequately between fetuses with FGR and those that are constitutionally small. This absence of association may be a result of diagnostic inaccuracies and/or post-diagnostic (e.g. intervention and selection) biases. We conclude that new approaches to detect placental insufficiency should integrate information from diagnostic tools such as maternal serum biomarkers and Doppler ultrasound measurements. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

胎儿生长受限(FGR)所涉及的胎盘功能障碍可能导致与胎儿缺氧相关的严重围产期不良结局(SAPO)。传统上,FGR 的诊断标准基于胎儿大小,这种方法存在固有缺陷,因为它经常导致过度或诊断不足。20 周妊娠的异常超声扫描可能是为个体胎儿生长潜力设定基准的适当时间。我们假设从那时起的胎儿生长轨迹可能与第三孕期胎盘功能障碍有关。本研究旨在调查 18+0 至 23+6 周和 32+0 至 36+6 周妊娠期间胎儿生长轨迹缓慢对 SAPO 的预测价值在一个大型低风险人群中。

方法

这是 IUGR 风险选择(IRIS)研究的事后数据分析,这是一项荷兰全国性的集群随机试验,评估了在第三孕期常规超声检查减少 SAPO 的(成本)效果。在当前分析中,对于第一次超声检查,我们使用了 18+0 至 23+6 周妊娠常规异常扫描的超声数据,对于第二次超声检查,我们使用了 32+0 至 36+6 周妊娠期间进行的超声检查的数据。使用多水平逻辑回归,我们分析了 SAPO 是否由胎儿生长缓慢轨迹预测,该轨迹定义为腹围(AC)和/或估计胎儿体重(EFW)下降超过 20 个百分位数或超过 50 个百分位数,或 AC 生长速度(ACGV)<10 个百分位数(p10)。此外,我们还分析了这些胎儿生长缓慢指标与小于胎龄儿(SGA)(AC 或 EFW<p10)和严重 SGA(AC/EFW<p3 个百分位数)在 32+0 至 36+6 周妊娠时的组合。

结果

我们的样本包括 6296 例低风险单胎妊娠的数据,其中 82 例(1.3%)新生儿至少经历了一次 SAPO。AC 或 EFW 下降超过 20 或 50 个百分位数或 ACGV<p10 与 SAPO 发生率增加无关。32+0 至 36+6 周妊娠时 EFW<p10 与 EFW 下降超过 20 个百分位数相结合与 SAPO 发生率增加相关。AC 或 EFW 在 32+0 至 36+6 周妊娠时低于 p10 与 ACGV<p10 相结合也与 SAPO 发生率增加相关。如果新生儿出生时为 SGA,则这些关联的比值比更高。

结论

在低风险人群中,作为单一标准的胎儿生长缓慢轨迹不能充分区分具有 FGR 的胎儿和那些具有结构上较小的胎儿。这种缺乏关联可能是由于诊断不准确和/或诊断后(例如干预和选择)偏倚。我们得出结论,应将新的方法来检测胎盘功能不全与来自诊断工具(如母体血清生物标志物和多普勒超声测量)的信息相结合。© 2023 作者。超声在妇产科由约翰威立父子有限公司代表国际超声在妇产科协会出版。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of fetal growth trajectory from 20 weeks of gestation onwards for severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: secondary analysis of IRIS study.从 20 孕周起的胎儿生长轨迹对低危人群严重不良围生期结局的预测价值:IRIS 研究的二次分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;62(6):796-804. doi: 10.1002/uog.26250.
2
Implication of third-trimester screening accuracy for small-for-gestational age and additive value of third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study.三期末筛查对小于胎龄儿的准确性的影响以及三期末生长轨迹指标对预测低危人群严重不良围产结局的附加价值:IRIS 研究的实用二次分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;62(2):209-218. doi: 10.1002/uog.26167. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.在 35-37 孕周的常规超声检查中预测小于胎龄儿和不良围产结局的两阶段方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
5
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素的影响和 32-36 孕周间的生长速度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;53(5):630-637. doi: 10.1002/uog.20267. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.通过常规孕晚期超声预测大于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;54(3):326-333. doi: 10.1002/uog.20377. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素和 20-36 孕周间生长速度的作用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):488-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.20243.
8
Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.胎儿生长受限与宫内生长受限:法国妇产科医师学院临床实践指南
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction.超声预测晚期胎儿生长受限诊断时的不良围产结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;59(3):342-349. doi: 10.1002/uog.23714.
10
Assessment of fetal growth trajectory identifies infants at high risk of perinatal mortality.评估胎儿生长轨迹可识别具有围产儿死亡高风险的婴儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;63(6):764-771. doi: 10.1002/uog.27610.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise According to the Expected Fetal Weight.根据预期胎儿体重预测产时胎儿窘迫
J Pers Med. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):140. doi: 10.3390/jpm15040140.
2
A nomogram for predicting adverse perinatal outcome with fetal growth restriction: a prospective observational study.用于预测胎儿生长受限围产期不良结局的列线图:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07252-5.