• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳排放交易政策对中国电力行业碳排放的影响:作用机制与空间溢出效应。

The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission of China's power industry: mechanism and spatial spillover effect.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management/Institute for Macroeconomy High-Quality Development of Xinjiang, Xinjiang University, Wulumuqi, Ürümqi, 830046, China.

School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Wulumuqi, Ürümqi, 830046, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74207-74222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27706-7. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-27706-7
PMID:37204586
Abstract

Carbon emission trading policy (CETP) is an important tool for energy savings and emission reduction. However, the effect of CETP on carbon emission reduction in power industry is still unknown. This paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) model and the intermediary effect model to test the impact and mechanism of CETP on power industry carbon emissions. In addition, a spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is established to analyze the spatial spillover effect. The results show that CETP has a significant inhibitory effect on power industry carbon emissions and the results are still valid after endogenous and robust tests. The improvement of technology level and power conversion efficiency plays an intermediary role for CETP to reduce power industry carbon emissions. The optimization of power generation structure is likely to become another important way for CETP to play its role in the future. The spatial spillover effect test shows that CETP not only has a significant inhibitory effect on power industry carbon emissions in the pilot areas but also has a negative spatial spillover effect on power industry carbon emissions in the surrounding non-pilot areas. The heterogeneity tests show that CETP has the most significant reduction effect in the central region of China and the strongest spatial spillover inhibiting effect in the eastern region. The purpose of this study is to provide decision-making references for government to achieve China's dual-carbon goal.

摘要

碳排放交易政策(CETP)是节能减排的重要工具。然而,CETP 对电力行业碳减排的影响尚不清楚。本文采用双重差分(DID)模型和中介效应模型,检验 CETP 对电力行业碳排放的影响及作用机制。此外,还构建了空间双重差分(SDID)模型,以分析空间溢出效应。结果表明,CETP 对电力行业碳排放具有显著的抑制作用,且经过内生性和稳健性检验后结果依然有效。技术水平提升和电能转换效率提高在 CETP 降低电力行业碳排放的过程中发挥中介作用。优化发电结构可能成为 CETP 未来发挥作用的另一个重要途径。空间溢出效应检验表明,CETP 不仅对试点地区电力行业碳排放具有显著的抑制作用,而且对周边非试点地区电力行业碳排放也具有负向的空间溢出效应。异质性检验表明,CETP 对中国中部地区的减排效果最为显著,对东部地区的空间溢出抑制效应最强。本文旨在为政府实现中国“双碳”目标提供决策参考。

相似文献

1
The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission of China's power industry: mechanism and spatial spillover effect.碳排放交易政策对中国电力行业碳排放的影响:作用机制与空间溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74207-74222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27706-7. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Research on the spatial spillover effect of China's carbon emission trading on total-factor carbon emission efficiency of the power industry.中国碳排放权交易对电力行业全要素碳排放效率的空间溢出效应研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):106698-106717. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29592-5. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects.中国的碳排放交易政策是否提高了区域能源效率?——基于准实验和政策溢出效应的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):21166-21183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17021-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Innovation spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放权交易试点政策的创新溢出效应
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):e20062. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Assessing the low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emission from consumption and production in China: how underlying mechanism and spatial spillover effect?评估中国低碳城市试点政策对消费和生产碳排放的影响:潜在机制和空间溢出效应如何?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71958-71977. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21005-3. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?-A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China.碳排放交易体系能否提高试点城市的绿色全要素生产率?——基于中国空间双重差分的计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031209.
7
Co-Benefits of China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme: Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect.中国碳排放权交易计划的协同效益:影响机制与溢出效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053792.
8
Does the carbon emission rights trading pilot policy aggravate local government fiscal pressure? Evidence from China.碳排放权交易试点政策是否加剧了地方政府财政压力?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):65217-65236. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26914-5. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
Spatial spillover effects of a carbon trading policy on green technology innovation in China.碳交易政策对中国绿色技术创新的空间溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(50):109500-109524. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30032-7. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
10
Does green credit reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China.绿色信贷能否减少碳排放?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):26735-26751. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24011-7. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Are carbon emissions trading and green financial instruments synergistic? -Comprehensive quantitative research based on content analysis.碳排放交易与绿色金融工具是否协同增效?——基于内容分析的综合定量研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0298601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298601. eCollection 2024.