• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国碳排放权交易试点政策的创新溢出效应

Innovation spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policy in China.

作者信息

Lai Junming, Chen Yueyan

机构信息

Zhejiang Yuying College of Vocational Technology 310018, China.

Research interests include industrial economy and macroeconomics.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):e20062. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062
PMID:37809833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10559821/
Abstract

In today's society, environmental protection and sustainable development have become the focus of global attention. Carbon emission trading, as an effective means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, has been adopted by many countries and regions. In China, the launch of pilot policies for carbon emissions trading is of great significance in promoting economic transformation, promoting industrial upgrading and protecting the environment. Therefore, it is of great value to study the innovation effect of the pilot carbon trading policy and its transmission path for evaluating the effect of the policy, optimizing the policy design and building the carbon market in the future. Based on the production network theory, this paper constructs a difference in difference model, and uses empirical analysis to evaluate the direct innovation effect and innovation network spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policies. In the empirical analysis, a variety of data sources are used, including public data from the National Bureau of Statistics, annual reports of enterprises, and industry associations, to ensure the reliability and validity of the data. At the same time, SPSS, Stata and other statistical software are applied to process and analyze the data in order to better understand and interpret the research results. The results show that the pilot carbon emission trading policy has a positive effect on improving the innovation level of both regulated and non-regulated industries in the pilot areas. Specifically, this policy can promote the technological innovation and management innovation of the regulated industries, but also promote the technological progress and market development of the non-regulated industries. In addition, the policy will also have an innovation network spillover effect, that is, the innovation results of the policy will be transmitted to the surrounding regions and industries, thus promoting the innovation and development of the entire region and industry. Further, this paper also discusses the transmission path of the innovation spillover effect of pilot carbon emission trading policies. It is found that the policy has a negative impact on the innovation of the relative upstream industry, but significantly promotes the innovation of the downstream industry. This is because the upstream industry, after being impacted by policies, often takes measures to reduce costs and improve efficiency to deal with the challenges, which may have a certain negative impact on the downstream industry. However, downstream industries are more likely to benefit from the innovation spillover effects of policies because they are more closely linked to the carbon emission trading market. Finally, this paper also tests the mechanism of the pilot carbon emission trading policy. It is found that the innovation spillover caused by this production-end shock is mainly realized through the price transmission of finished products. In addition, the inclusion of industries with strong bargaining power and close links with downstream industries in the national pilot carbon emission trading policy is more conducive to the innovation spillover effect of the policy. This is because these industries have stronger market influence and bargaining power, and can better promote the construction and development of the carbon emission trading market.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea54/10559821/f274efaac252/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea54/10559821/8df34d1c88c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea54/10559821/f274efaac252/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea54/10559821/8df34d1c88c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea54/10559821/f274efaac252/gr2.jpg
摘要

在当今社会,环境保护与可持续发展已成为全球关注的焦点。碳排放交易作为减少温室气体排放的有效手段,已被许多国家和地区采用。在中国,碳排放交易试点政策的推出对于推动经济转型、促进产业升级和保护环境具有重要意义。因此,研究碳排放交易试点政策的创新效应及其传导路径,对于评估政策效果、优化政策设计以及未来构建碳市场具有重要价值。基于生产网络理论,本文构建了双重差分模型,并运用实证分析来评估碳排放交易试点政策的直接创新效应和创新网络溢出效应。在实证分析中,使用了多种数据来源,包括国家统计局的公开数据、企业年报以及行业协会的数据,以确保数据的可靠性和有效性。同时,应用SPSS、Stata等统计软件对数据进行处理和分析,以便更好地理解和解释研究结果。结果表明,碳排放交易试点政策对提高试点地区受管制行业和非受管制行业的创新水平均有积极影响。具体而言,该政策既能促进受管制行业的技术创新和管理创新,也能推动非受管制行业的技术进步和市场发展。此外,该政策还会产生创新网络溢出效应,即政策的创新成果会传递到周边地区和行业,从而促进整个地区和行业的创新发展。进一步地,本文还探讨了碳排放交易试点政策创新溢出效应的传导路径。研究发现,该政策对相对上游行业的创新有负面影响,但对下游行业的创新有显著促进作用。这是因为上游行业在受到政策冲击后,往往会采取降低成本和提高效率的措施来应对挑战,这可能会对下游行业产生一定的负面影响。然而,下游行业更有可能从政策的创新溢出效应中受益,因为它们与碳排放交易市场联系更为紧密。最后,本文还对碳排放交易试点政策的作用机制进行了检验。研究发现,这种生产端冲击引起的创新溢出主要通过成品价格传导来实现。此外,将议价能力强且与下游行业联系紧密的行业纳入国家碳排放交易试点政策,更有利于政策的创新溢出效应。这是因为这些行业具有更强的市场影响力和议价能力,能够更好地推动碳排放交易市场的建设和发展。

相似文献

1
Innovation spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放权交易试点政策的创新溢出效应
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):e20062. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Time-varying spillovers among pilot carbon emission trading markets in China.中国试点碳市场的时变溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57421-57436. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19914-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects.中国的碳排放交易政策是否提高了区域能源效率?——基于准实验和政策溢出效应的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):21166-21183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17021-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission of China's power industry: mechanism and spatial spillover effect.碳排放交易政策对中国电力行业碳排放的影响:作用机制与空间溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74207-74222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27706-7. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
Can carbon emissions trading policy promote product bargaining power increases for high-carbon enterprises? Evidence from China.碳排放交易政策能否提高高碳企业的产品议价能力?来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 17;19(6):e0302916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302916. eCollection 2024.
6
The Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot Policy in China: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment.中国碳交易试点政策的节能减排效果:基于准自然实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159272.
7
Have carbon emission trading pilot policy improved urban innovation capacity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.碳排放权交易试点政策是否提高了城市创新能力?来自中国准自然实验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10119-10132. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25699-x. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
8
Research on the innovation incentive effect and heterogeneity of the market-incentive environmental regulation on mineral resource enterprises.关于市场激励型环境规制对矿产资源企业创新激励效应及其异质性的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(41):58456-58469. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14788-4. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
Impact of carbon emission trading system on green technology innovation of energy enterprises in China.碳排放交易体系对中国能源企业绿色技术创新的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121229. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121229. Epub 2024 May 25.
10
Research on the spatial spillover effect of China's carbon emission trading on total-factor carbon emission efficiency of the power industry.中国碳排放权交易对电力行业全要素碳排放效率的空间溢出效应研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):106698-106717. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29592-5. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental improvement value of agricultural carbon reduction and its spatiotemporal dynamic evolution: Evidence from China.农业碳减排的环境改善价值及其时空动态演变:来自中国的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 1;754:142170. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142170. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
2
Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the agricultural sector of China's main grain-producing areas.碳排放、能源消耗与经济增长:来自中国主要粮食产区农业部门的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 15;665:1017-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.162. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China.
碳排放权交易计划能否产生波特效应?来自中国试点地区的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:565-577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.395. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
The Environment and Directed Technical Change.环境与定向技术变革
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Feb;102(1):131-166. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.131.
5
The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions.环境规制对企业竞争绩效的影响:以部分欧盟地区建筑行业为例。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Sep;92(9):2136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.039. Epub 2011 Apr 27.