Department of Surgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, India.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur, India.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 19;408(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02941-1.
We have performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing total thyroidectomy (TT) with less than total thyroidectomy (LTT) for benign multinodular non-toxic goiter (BMNG).
The objective was to evaluate the effects and outcomes of TT as compared to LTT.
Eligibility criteria: RCTs comparing TT vs LTT.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and online registers were searched for articles comparing TT with LTT. Risk of bias: Articles were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane's revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2 tool).
The main summary measures were risk difference using a random effects model.
Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Recurrence rate was lower for TT compared to LTT. Adverse events like temporary or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and permanent hypoparathyroidism were similar in both groups except for the rate of temporary hypoparathyroidism which was lower in the LTT group.
All studies had unclear risk of bias for blinding of the participants and personnel and high risk of bias for certain selective reporting. This meta-analysis did not show any clear benefit or harm of either procedure (TT vs LTT) for goiter recurrence and re-operation rates (for both recurrence and incidental thyroid cancer). However, re-operation for goiter recurrence was significantly higher in the LTT group based on a single RCT. Evidence suggests increased rates of temporary hypoparathyroidism with TT but there was no difference in the rate of RLN palsy and permanent hypoparathyroidism between the two methods. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate.
我们对比较良性多结节性毒性甲状腺肿(BMNG)行全甲状腺切除术(TT)与非全甲状腺切除术(LTT)的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了更新的荟萃分析。
评估 TT 与 LTT 的效果和结果。
纳入标准:比较 TT 与 LTT 的 RCT。
对比较 TT 与 LTT 的文章,我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和在线登记处进行了检索。偏倚风险:使用 Cochrane 修订的评估随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2 工具)评估文章的偏倚风险。
主要汇总指标是使用随机效应模型的风险差异。
荟萃分析纳入了 5 项 RCT。TT 的复发率低于 LTT。暂时性或永久性喉返神经(RLN)麻痹和永久性甲状旁腺功能减退等不良事件在两组中相似,但 LTT 组暂时性甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率较低。
所有研究在参与者和医务人员的盲法和某些选择性报告的高偏倚风险方面均具有不确定的偏倚风险。该荟萃分析并未显示任何明确的获益或危害,即 TT 与 LTT 对甲状腺肿复发和再次手术率(无论是复发还是偶然的甲状腺癌)的影响。然而,基于一项 RCT,LTT 组的甲状腺肿复发再次手术率显著更高。证据表明 TT 后暂时性甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率增加,但两种方法之间 RLN 麻痹和永久性甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率无差异。总体证据质量为低到中度。