Department of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kitano Hospital, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Dec;36(6):680-685. doi: 10.1177/19714009231177382. Epub 2023 May 20.
Pseudoaneurysms are a serious complication of neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture, for which ultrasound-guided compression repair (UGCR) is often the first choice of radical therapy. We sought to retrospectively investigate the factors for failure of UGCR for pseudoaneurysm at the femoral artery puncture site.
Among patients undergoing neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture at our hospital between January 2018 and April 2021, those who received a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm and underwent UGCR were enrolled. They were classified into two groups according to whether UGCR was successful (UGCR group) or was converted to surgical repair (SR group). Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between the two groups.
During the study period, 577 patients underwent neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture, 10 of whom (1.7%) received a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm and underwent UGCR. There were seven patients in the UGCR group and three patients in the SR group. The sheath diameter tended to be larger in the SR group than in the UGCR group ( = 0.16). The modified Rankin scale score when a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm was made was significantly lower in the SR group than in the UGCR group (1 [0-2] vs. 3 [2-5], = 0.037).
Physical activity may be associated with failure of UGCR. In patients with high physical activity, the use of sedatives and analgesics to keep them at rest during puncture site compression after UGCR may lead to successful UGCR.
假性动脉瘤是经股动脉穿刺神经血管内治疗的严重并发症,超声引导压迫修复(UGCR)通常是根治性治疗的首选。我们旨在回顾性研究股动脉穿刺部位假性动脉瘤 UGCR 失败的相关因素。
在我院 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受经股动脉穿刺神经血管内治疗的患者中,纳入经诊断为假性动脉瘤并接受 UGCR 的患者。根据 UGCR 是否成功(UGCR 组)或转为手术修复(SR 组)将其分为两组。比较两组患者和手术特征。
在研究期间,577 例患者接受了经股动脉穿刺神经血管内治疗,其中 10 例(1.7%)诊断为假性动脉瘤并接受了 UGCR。UGCR 组有 7 例患者,SR 组有 3 例患者。SR 组的鞘管直径大于 UGCR 组( = 0.16)。SR 组患者假性动脉瘤诊断时改良 Rankin 量表评分明显低于 UGCR 组(1[0-2]比 3[2-5], = 0.037)。
体力活动可能与 UGCR 失败有关。在体力活动较高的患者中,在 UGCR 后穿刺部位压迫时使用镇静剂和镇痛药使他们保持静止,可能会使 UGCR 成功。