Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa-machi, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan.
Vision Res. 2023 Aug;209:108262. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108262. Epub 2023 May 19.
When some distractors (old items) appear before the other distractors and the target (new items) during an inefficient visual search task, the old items are effectively excluded from the search (preview benefit). Previous studies have shown that this preview benefit is observed when items are presented in two temporal stages, namely the initial and second displays. In this situation, new and old items are defined by a single time point (i.e., new items appearing), and the newness of the items is constant through the target search. However, in the real world, the newness of items is updated by the newer objects appearing, which requires more complex computations to detect relevant information among them. The present study examined whether previewing affects the attentional shift to a newer object if multiple new items appear successively. I used the modified preview-search paradigm, which contains three temporally separated displays, and examined what happens if the singleton target appears 200 ms after other distractors appear in the third display. This successive (search) condition was compared to the simultaneous (search) condition in which no distractors were presented in the initial display, and all distractors appeared simultaneously in the second display. The results showed that attentional shift to a newer object requires more time in the successive condition than in the simultaneous condition (Experiment 1). Moreover, the search cost for the newer target would not be induced by a mere difference in the onset timings (Experiment 2) and would occur when the duration of the initial distractors was short, and thus visual marking of the initial distractors might not occur maximally (Experiment 3). Therefore, previewing degrades attentional shift to a newer object when multiple new items appear successively.
当在低效视觉搜索任务中,一些干扰项(旧项目)出现在其他干扰项和目标(新项目)之前时,旧项目会被有效地从搜索中排除(预览优势)。先前的研究表明,当项目分两个时间阶段呈现时,即初始显示和第二显示,会观察到这种预览优势。在这种情况下,新项目和旧项目通过单一时间点定义(即新项目出现),并且通过目标搜索,项目的新颖性保持不变。然而,在现实世界中,项目的新颖性会通过新出现的对象更新,这需要更复杂的计算来检测其中的相关信息。本研究考察了如果多个新项目连续出现,预览是否会影响对较新项目的注意转移。我使用了修改后的预览搜索范式,其中包含三个时间上分离的显示,并考察了在第三显示中其他干扰项出现 200 毫秒后 singleton 目标出现的情况。这个连续(搜索)条件与同时(搜索)条件进行了比较,在同时条件下,初始显示中没有呈现干扰项,所有干扰项都同时出现在第二显示中。结果表明,在连续条件下,注意向较新项目的转移比在同时条件下需要更多的时间(实验 1)。此外,搜索较新项目的成本不会仅仅因为起始时间的差异而引起(实验 2),并且会在初始干扰项的持续时间较短时发生,因此初始干扰项的视觉标记可能不会最大化(实验 3)。因此,当多个新项目连续出现时,预览会降低对较新项目的注意转移。