Suppr超能文献

人类大脑中的概率推理和演绎推理。

Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, Giessen 35394, Germany.

Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, Giessen 35394, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2023 Jul 15;275:120180. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120180. Epub 2023 May 19.

Abstract

Reasoning is a process of inference from given premises to new conclusions. Deductive reasoning is truth-preserving and conclusions can only be either true or false. Probabilistic reasoning is based on degrees of belief and conclusions can be more or less likely. While deductive reasoning requires people to focus on the logical structure of the inference and ignore its content, probabilistic reasoning requires the retrieval of prior knowledge from memory. Recently, however, some researchers have denied that deductive reasoning is a faculty of the human mind. What looks like deductive inference might actually also be probabilistic inference, only with extreme probabilities. We tested this assumption in an fMRI experiment with two groups of participants: one group was instructed to reason deductively, the other received probabilistic instructions. They could freely choose between a binary and a graded response to each problem. The conditional probability and the logical validity of the inferences were systematically varied. Results show that prior knowledge was only used in the probabilistic reasoning group. These participants gave graded responses more often than those in the deductive reasoning group and their reasoning was accompanied by activations in the hippocampus. Participants in the deductive group mostly gave binary responses and their reasoning was accompanied by activations in the anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal cortex, and parietal regions. These findings show that (1) deductive and probabilistic reasoning rely on different neurocognitive processes, (2) people can suppress their prior knowledge to reason deductively, and (3) not all inferences can be reduced to probabilistic reasoning.

摘要

推理是一种从给定前提推断出新结论的过程。演绎推理是保真的,结论只能是真或假。概率推理基于置信度,结论可以更有可能或不太可能。虽然演绎推理要求人们关注推理的逻辑结构而忽略其内容,但概率推理需要从记忆中检索先前的知识。然而,最近一些研究人员否认演绎推理是人类思维的一种能力。看起来像演绎推理的推理实际上也可能是概率推理,只是概率极端。我们在一项 fMRI 实验中检验了这一假设,该实验有两组参与者:一组被指示进行演绎推理,另一组则接受概率推理的指示。他们可以自由选择对每个问题进行二进制或分级响应。推理的条件概率和逻辑有效性被系统地改变。结果表明,只有在概率推理组中才使用了先前的知识。这些参与者更频繁地给出分级响应,而不是演绎推理组,他们的推理伴随着海马体的激活。演绎推理组的参与者大多给出二进制响应,他们的推理伴随着前扣带皮层、下额叶皮层和顶叶区域的激活。这些发现表明:(1)演绎推理和概率推理依赖于不同的神经认知过程;(2)人们可以抑制其先前的知识以进行演绎推理;(3)并非所有的推理都可以简化为概率推理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验