Cloatre Emilie, Ndoye Tidiane, Badji Dioumel, Diedhiou Adams
University of Kent, UK.
Université Check Anta Diop, Senegal.
Soc Leg Stud. 2023 Jun;32(3):356-377. doi: 10.1177/09646639221122434. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
In this paper, we chart the context in which contemporary legal debates around traditional healing in Senegal unfold, pointing in particular to the type of power-knowledge relations that are at stake in both the current legal status-quo, and legal changes proposed in 2017. We interrogate the struggles over legitimacy and recognition that are at play in these processes, and the ways in which different actors relate to both formal legal rules, and more fluid forms of legalities, in which imaginaries of the law, and negotiations with the law, translate into everyday practices. We underline how legal and scientific discourses are mobilised to draw the opportunities and boundaries offered to different healing agents, and to organise their respective authority. Traditional healers overlap with modern health practices, while retaining their own ontologies and claims to legitimacy while representatives of the biomedical professions insist that they should have some oversight over the regulation of all healers. As negotiations continue over the possibility for the state to regulate traditional healing, everyday legal choreographies define the relative roles, possibilities and precarity of different healing agents.
在本文中,我们梳理了塞内加尔围绕传统疗法展开的当代法律辩论所处的背景,特别指出了当前法律现状以及2017年提议的法律变革中所涉及的权力-知识关系类型。我们审视了这些过程中围绕合法性和认可的斗争,以及不同行为体与正式法律规则和更灵活的合法性形式之间的关联方式,在这些形式中,法律想象和与法律的协商转化为日常实践。我们强调法律和科学话语如何被调动起来,以勾勒出为不同治疗者提供的机会和界限,并组织他们各自的权威。传统治疗者与现代医疗实践相互交织,同时保留着自己的本体论和合法性主张,而生物医学专业的代表则坚持认为他们应对所有治疗者的监管拥有一定的监督权。随着关于国家对传统疗法进行监管可能性的谈判持续进行,日常法律编排界定了不同治疗者的相对角色、可能性和不稳定性。