Janes C R
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado-Denver, 80217-3364, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jun;48(12):1803-20. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00082-9.
The epidemiologic and demographic consequences of the health transition, coupled with worldwide pressures for health care reform according to neoliberal tenets, will create new opportunities, and well as new problems, for organized systems of indigenous medicine. Spiraling costs of biomedically-based health care, coupled with an increasing global burden of chronic, degenerative diseases and mental disorder, will produce significant incentives for the expansion of indigenous alternatives. Yet this expansion will be accompanied by pressures to rationalize and modernize health care services according to the structurally dominant scientific paradigm. Without concerted effort to maintain native epistemologies, indigenous medical systems face an inevitable slide into narrow herbal traditions and a loss of those elements of diagnosis and therapy which may be the most valuable and effective. Analyzing the case of Tibetan medicine and other Asian medical systems, I show how this process occurs and how it is resisted. I conclude by discussing the policy dimensions of this problem.
健康转型的流行病学和人口统计学后果,再加上全球范围内依据新自由主义原则进行医疗改革的压力,将为传统医学的有组织体系带来新机遇,也带来新问题。以生物医学为基础的医疗保健成本不断攀升,再加上全球慢性、退行性疾病和精神障碍负担日益加重,将为传统医学替代疗法的扩展提供巨大动力。然而,这种扩展将伴随着按照结构上占主导地位的科学范式使医疗服务合理化和现代化的压力。如果不共同努力维护本土认识论,传统医学体系将不可避免地沦为狭隘的草药传统,并失去那些可能最有价值和最有效的诊断与治疗要素。通过分析藏医学和其他亚洲医学体系的案例,我展示了这一过程是如何发生的以及如何加以抵制。最后,我将讨论这个问题的政策层面。