• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头静脉切开术用于完全植入式静脉通路端口:单机构系列回顾性研究

Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series.

作者信息

Vélez Ángel Barba

机构信息

Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, IMQ Zorrotzaurre University Hospital, Ballets Olaeta Kalea, 4, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023 Apr 11;59:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.04.002
PMID:37213486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10196808/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to describe the early and late success rates of cephalic vein cut down (CVC) in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) for chemotherapy treatment in oncological patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 1 047 TIVAP performed in a private institution between 2008 and 2021. The CVC with pre-operative ultrasound (PUS) was the initial approach. All cephalic veins (CVs) were mapped pre-operatively with Doppler ultrasound, measuring their diameter and course in oncological patients who required a TIVAP. With a CV diameter ≥ 3.2 mm TIVAP was carried out by CVC; with CV diameter < 3.2 mm, subclavian vein puncture (SVP) was performed.

RESULTS

1 047 TIVAPs were implanted in 998 patients. The mean age was 61.5 ± 11.5 years, 624 were women (65.5%). Male patients were significantly older and with a higher incidence of colonic, digestive system, and laryngeal cancer. Initially, TIVAP was indicated in 858 cases (82%) by CVC and 189 (18%) by SVP. The success rate was 98.5% for CVC and 98.4% for SVP. There were no complications for CVC (0%) but five early complications (2.5%) in the SVP group. The rates of late complications were 4.4% in the CVC group and 5.0% in the SVP group, foreign body infection being the most frequent (57.5% of the cases) ( = .85).

CONCLUSION

The CVC or SVP using PUS for TIVAP deployment, performed through a single incision, is a safe and effective technique. This open but minimally invasive technique should be considered in oncological patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述在肿瘤患者化疗中植入全植入式静脉通路端口(TIVAP)时头静脉切开术(CVC)的早期和晚期成功率。

方法

这是一项对2008年至2021年在一家私立机构进行的1047例TIVAP植入术的回顾性研究。术前超声引导下的CVC是初始方法。在所有需要TIVAP的肿瘤患者中,术前使用多普勒超声对头静脉(CV)进行定位,测量其直径和走行。CV直径≥3.2mm时通过CVC进行TIVAP植入;CV直径<3.2mm时,进行锁骨下静脉穿刺(SVP)。

结果

998例患者共植入1047个TIVAP。平均年龄为61.5±11.5岁,女性624例(65.5%)。男性患者年龄显著更大,结肠癌、消化系统癌和喉癌的发病率更高。最初,858例(82%)患者通过CVC植入TIVAP,189例(18%)通过SVP植入。CVC的成功率为98.5%,SVP的成功率为98.4%。CVC组无并发症(0%),但SVP组有5例早期并发症(2.5%)。晚期并发症发生率在CVC组为4.4%,在SVP组为5.0%,异物感染最为常见(占病例的57.5%)(P = 0.85)。

结论

通过单一切口使用术前超声引导进行TIVAP植入的CVC或SVP是一种安全有效的技术。这种开放但微创的技术应在肿瘤患者中考虑应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e2/10196808/4bcf4c8700b3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e2/10196808/0d666e78be5f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e2/10196808/4bcf4c8700b3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e2/10196808/0d666e78be5f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e2/10196808/4bcf4c8700b3/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series.头静脉切开术用于完全植入式静脉通路端口:单机构系列回顾性研究
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023 Apr 11;59:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023.
2
Cephalic Vein Cut-Down Method for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Single-Institution Experience.完全植入式静脉输液港的头静脉切开法:单机构经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jan;98:244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
3
Subclavian and Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.锁骨下静脉和腋静脉穿刺置管与头静脉切开用于心脏植入式电子设备植入的比较:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;6(6):661-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Perioperative and Postoperative Complications of Supraclavicular, Ultrasound-Guided, Totally Implantable Venous Access Port via the Brachiocephalic Vein in Adult Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Study.成人患者经头臂静脉行锁骨上超声引导下完全植入式静脉通路端口的围手术期和术后并发症:一项回顾性多中心研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Feb 4;17:137-144. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S292230. eCollection 2021.
5
Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.肿瘤患者植入全植入式静脉通路端口时,原发性开放与闭合植入策略后气胸和血胸的发生率:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 31;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0643-z.
6
Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein-a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients.经颈内静脉开放 Seldinger 入路行完全植入式静脉输液港置入术——500 例连续患者的回顾性风险分层。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02097-w. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
7
Closed cannulation of subclavian vein vs open cut-down of cephalic vein for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation: protocol for a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications.完全植入式静脉通路端口(TIVAP)植入术采用锁骨下静脉封闭插管与头静脉开放切开插管的比较:围手术期和术后并发症的系统评价与比例Meta分析方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 22;4:53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0043-1.
8
Ultrasound-guided totally implantable venous access ports placement via right brachiocephalic vein in pediatric population: A clinical debut.超声引导下经右头臂静脉在儿科人群中完全植入式静脉输液港的置管:临床初探。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Oct;69(10):e29911. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29911. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
9
Outcome analysis in 270 radiologically guided implantations of totally implantable venous access ports via basilic vein.270 例经贵要静脉行完全植入式静脉输液港放射影像学引导植入术的结果分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Mar;83(3):295-301. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000265.
10
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided totally implantable venous access ports via the right innominate vein in adult patients with cancer: Single-centre experience and protocol.超声引导下经右无名静脉置入完全植入式静脉输液港在成人肿瘤患者中的疗效和安全性:单中心经验和方案。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):275-278. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.048. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of totally implantable venous access ports on complications and quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy.全植入式静脉输液港对胃肠道癌化疗并发症及生活质量的影响
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):109333. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.109333.
2
Literature Review of Venous Spasm During Pacemaker Implantation.起搏器植入过程中静脉痉挛的文献综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88682. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Surgical technique: placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through a cephalic vein cutdown in pediatric patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.首例完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAD)植入 40 年后:单纯的外科切开技术仅能避免可致命的即刻并发症。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1739-1749. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02225-6. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.静脉输液港植入标准算法的长期结果
J Pers Med. 2021 Apr 24;11(5):344. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050344.
3
Ultrasound guided percutaneous cephalic venipuncture for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices.
手术技术:通过小儿患者的头静脉切开置入完全植入式静脉通路端口(TIVAP)。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):1820-1827. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-305. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
超声引导下经皮头静脉穿刺植入心脏植入式电子设备。
J Vasc Access. 2022 May;23(3):416-421. doi: 10.1177/1129729821995295. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Totally implantable venous access devices: The supraclavicular percutaneous approach and early complications.完全植入式静脉通路装置:锁骨下入路及早期并发症。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(7):1575-1581. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1082_19.
5
Chinese expert consensus and practice guideline of totally implantable access port for digestive tract carcinomas.《中国消化道恶性肿瘤完全植入式输液港临床应用专家共识和实践指南》
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 7;26(25):3517-3527. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3517.
6
Subclavian and Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.锁骨下静脉和腋静脉穿刺置管与头静脉切开用于心脏植入式电子设备植入的比较:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;6(6):661-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.一份聚焦早期并发症的长期中心静脉导管五年数据报告。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 10;2019:6769506. doi: 10.1155/2019/6769506. eCollection 2019.
8
Primary Open Versus Closed Implantation Strategy for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: The Multicentre Randomized Controlled PORTAS-3 Trial (DRKS 00004900).完全植入式静脉输液港的开放式与闭合式植入策略的比较:多中心随机对照 PORTAS-3 试验(DRKS 00004900)。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):950-960. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003705.
9
Comparative study of access routes for Port-A-Cath® implantation.Port-A-Cath®植入术不同入路的比较研究。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Feb;98(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.用于可植入式中心静脉通路的头静脉入路:单机构经验的回顾性研究;队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e18007. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018007.