• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当地举措在 2020 年夏季 SARS-CoV-2 激增期间支持病例隔离和接触者追踪:比利时安特卫普的社区案例研究。

Local initiative supports case isolation and contact tracing during a SARS-CoV-2 surge in summer 2020: a community case study in Antwerp, Belgium.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 May 5;11:1000617. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1000617. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1000617
PMID:37213599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10196007/
Abstract

In Antwerp, Belgium's second largest city, a COVID-19 surge in July 2020 predominantly affected neighborhoods with high ethnic diversity. Local volunteers reacted and set up an initiative to support contact tracing and self-isolation. We describe the origin, implementation, and transfer of this local initiative, based on semi-structured interviews of five key informants and document review. The initiative started in July 2020, when family physicians signaled a surge of SARS-CoV-2 infections among people of Moroccan descent. Family physicians feared that the mainstream contact tracing organized by the Flemish government through centralized call centers would not be efficient in halting this outbreak. They anticipated language barriers, mistrust, inability to investigate case clusters, and practical problems with self-isolation. It took 11 days to start up the initiative, with logistical support from the province and city of Antwerp. Family physicians referred SARS-CoV-2-infected index cases with complex needs (including language and social situation) to the initiative. Volunteer COVID coaches contacted cases, got a contextualized understanding of their living conditions, assisted with backward and forward contact tracing, offered support during self-isolation, and checked if infected contacts also needed support. Interviewed coaches were positive about the quality of the interaction: they described extensive open conversations with cases. The coaches reported back to referring family physicians and coordinators of the local initiative, who took additional action if necessary. Although interactions with affected communities were perceived as good, respondents considered that the number of referrals by family physicians was too low to have a meaningful impact on the outbreak. In September 2020, the Flemish government assigned the tasks of local contact tracing and case support to the local health system level (primary care zones). While doing so, they adopted elements of this local initiative, such as COVID coaches, tracing system, and extended questionnaires to talk with cases and contacts. This community case study illustrates how urgency can motivate people to action yet support from people with access to resources and coordination capacity is vital for effective organization and transition to long-term sustainability. From their conception, health policies should consider adaptability of new interventions to local contexts.

摘要

在比利时第二大城市安特卫普,2020 年 7 月的 COVID-19 疫情主要影响了族裔多样性较高的社区。当地志愿者做出反应,发起了一项支持接触者追踪和自我隔离的倡议。我们基于对五位关键知情人的半结构化访谈和文件审查,描述了这一地方倡议的起源、实施和转移。该倡议始于 2020 年 7 月,当时家庭医生报告说,摩洛哥裔人群中 SARS-CoV-2 感染人数激增。家庭医生担心,弗拉芒政府通过集中式呼叫中心组织的主流接触者追踪,无法有效阻止疫情爆发。他们预计会遇到语言障碍、不信任、无法调查病例群集以及自我隔离的实际问题。该倡议启动耗时 11 天,得到了安特卫普省和市的后勤支持。家庭医生将有复杂需求(包括语言和社会状况)的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的索引病例转介给该倡议。志愿者 COVID 教练联系病例,了解其生活状况的背景信息,协助进行回溯和向前接触者追踪,在自我隔离期间提供支持,并检查感染的接触者是否也需要支持。接受采访的教练对互动的质量表示肯定:他们描述了与病例的广泛开放对话。教练们向转介的家庭医生和地方倡议协调员报告,如有必要,协调员会采取进一步行动。尽管与受影响社区的互动被认为是良好的,但受访者认为家庭医生的转介人数太少,无法对疫情产生有意义的影响。2020 年 9 月,弗拉芒政府将当地接触者追踪和病例支持的任务分配给地方卫生系统层面(初级保健区)。在这样做的过程中,他们采用了该地方倡议的一些元素,如 COVID 教练、追踪系统和扩展问卷,以便与病例和接触者交谈。这项社区案例研究说明了紧迫感如何促使人们采取行动,但来自有资源和协调能力的人的支持对于有效的组织和向长期可持续性过渡至关重要。从一开始,卫生政策就应该考虑新干预措施适应当地情况的适应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e936/10196007/0e079de1ba1e/fpubh-11-1000617-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e936/10196007/d7268324cc74/fpubh-11-1000617-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e936/10196007/0e079de1ba1e/fpubh-11-1000617-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e936/10196007/d7268324cc74/fpubh-11-1000617-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e936/10196007/0e079de1ba1e/fpubh-11-1000617-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Local initiative supports case isolation and contact tracing during a SARS-CoV-2 surge in summer 2020: a community case study in Antwerp, Belgium.当地举措在 2020 年夏季 SARS-CoV-2 激增期间支持病例隔离和接触者追踪:比利时安特卫普的社区案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 5;11:1000617. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1000617. eCollection 2023.
2
Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Volunteer-Staffed Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Initiative at an Urban Academic Medical Center.设计、实施和评估城市学术医疗中心的志愿者主导的病例调查和接触者追踪计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32110.
3
Successful control of COVID-19 outbreak through tracing, testing, and isolation: Lessons learned from the outbreak control efforts made in a metropolitan city of South Korea.通过追踪、检测和隔离成功控制 COVID-19 疫情:从韩国一个大都市的疫情防控工作中吸取的经验教训。
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Sep;14(9):1151-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
Meeting Social Needs in a Crisis Context: Lessons Learned from Integrating the 'Take Care Initiative' into New York City's Testing and Contact Tracing Program.在危机背景下满足社会需求:从将“关怀倡议”纳入纽约市检测和接触者追踪计划中吸取的经验教训。
J Urban Health. 2024 Oct;101(5):902-912. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00900-9. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Key performance indicators of COVID-19 contact tracing in Belgium from September 2020 to December 2021.2020年9月至2021年12月比利时新冠病毒接触者追踪的关键绩效指标。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0292346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292346. eCollection 2023.
6
A University-Led Contact Tracing Program Response to a COVID-19 Outbreak Among Students in Georgia, February-March 2021.佐治亚州大学主导的接触者追踪项目应对 2021 年 2 月至 3 月期间学生中 COVID-19 疫情爆发的情况。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(2_suppl):61S-66S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221113866. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
7
Daily use of lateral flow devices by contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases to enable exemption from isolation compared with standard self-isolation to reduce onward transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in England: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.接触者每日使用侧向流动检测装置以替代标准自我隔离来免除隔离,从而减少英格兰 SARS-CoV-2 的传播:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Nov;10(11):1074-1085. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00267-3. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.2021年2月至3月在荷兰开展的一项试点研究:实际操作中手动反向接触者追踪对控制新冠疫情的价值。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Oct;28(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916.
9
Investigation and contact tracing of the first cases of COVID-19 in Mozambique, 2020.2020 年莫桑比克首例新冠肺炎病例的调查和接触者追踪。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Apr 14;41:302. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.302.26979. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of contact tracing and nucleic acid testing on the COVID-19 outbreak in Zunyi, China: data-driven study using a branching process model.遵义市基于分支过程模型的传染病接触者追踪和核酸检测对 COVID-19 疫情影响的数据分析研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07967-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.
2
Community case study for surveillance and early case-detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections across high-risk key populations: the Sentinella programme.社区病例研究,用于对高危关键人群中的 SARS-CoV-2 感染进行监测和早期病例发现:哨兵计划。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;12:1432157. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1432157. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp.

本文引用的文献

1
'No one size fits all' - community trust-building as a strategy to reduce COVID-19-related health disparities.“一刀切”不适用——建立社区信任是减少 COVID-19 相关健康差距的策略。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14936-6.
2
COVID-19 as a social disease: qualitative analysis of COVID-19 prevention needs, impact of control measures and community responses among racialized/ethnic minorities in Antwerp, Belgium.COVID-19 作为一种社会疾病:定性分析比利时安特卫普的少数族裔/族裔群体的 COVID-19 预防需求、控制措施影响和社区应对措施。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 May 16;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01672-x.
3
评估安特卫普市应对 COVID-19 危机的城市治理研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19569-5.
4
Experiences and observations from a care point for displaced Ukrainians: a community case study in Antwerp, Belgium.从一个为流离失所的乌克兰人设立的服务点获得的经验和观察:比利时安特卫普的社区案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;12:1349364. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1349364. eCollection 2024.
Evaluation of the First Year(s) of Physicians Collaboration on an Interdisciplinary Electronic Consultation Platform in the Netherlands: Mixed Methods Observational Study.
荷兰跨学科电子会诊平台上医生合作第一年的评估:混合方法观察性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e33630. doi: 10.2196/33630.
4
COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries.COVID-19 与十个国家的医疗体系韧性
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1314-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01750-1. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
Improving access to primary health care: a cross-case comparison based on an a priori program theory.改善初级卫生保健服务的可及性:基于先验项目理论的跨案例比较
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Oct 11;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01508-0.
6
High politics in the Low Countries: COVID-19 and the politics of strained multi-level policy cooperation in Belgium and the Netherlands.低地国家的高层政治:新冠疫情与比利时和荷兰多层次政策合作紧张局势下的政治
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):305-317. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1101. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study.医疗保健的整合还是碎片化?比利时案例研究中的政策与政治分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1668-1681. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.58. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
8
Belgium's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.比利时应对 COVID-19 大流行的举措。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jan;17(1):37-47. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000232. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
9
Implementation of a volunteer contact tracing program for COVID-19 in the United States: A qualitative focus group study.美国实施 COVID-19 志愿者接触者追踪计划:一项定性焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251033. eCollection 2021.
10
Community Health Workers as a Strategy to Tackle Psychosocial Suffering Due to Physical Distancing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.社区卫生工作者作为应对因物理隔离导致的心理社会痛苦的策略:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;18(6):3097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063097.