Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Economics, University of Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, B-3000Leuven, Belgium.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jan;17(1):37-47. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000232. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
Belgium is often seen as an outlier in the international experience with the coronavirus disease 2019. We summarize the unfolding of the pandemic in Belgium from February to December 2020, discuss the countermeasures that were implemented and provide some explanations why the numbers indicate a stronger pandemic in Belgium than in its neighbouring countries. To some extent, the seemingly poor performance of Belgium is a measurement artefact. Yet, there were indeed particular factors in Belgium that unnecessarily increased the toll of the pandemic. In the first wave insufficient priority was given to protect care homes. The second wave was larger than necessary due to a failure to timely implement restrictive measures. The latter can, at least partly, be explained by a unique political situation: a temporary, minority government in the middle of a major crisis.
比利时在国际上应对 2019 年冠状病毒病的经验中常常被视为一个异类。我们总结了 2020 年 2 月至 12 月期间比利时的疫情发展,讨论了实施的对策,并对为何数据显示比利时的疫情比邻国更为严重提供了一些解释。在某种程度上,比利时看似不佳的表现是一种衡量上的偏差。然而,比利时确实存在一些特殊因素,导致疫情的影响不必要地加剧。在第一波疫情中,对保护养老院的重视程度不够。由于未能及时实施限制措施,第二波疫情的规模比必要的更大。这种情况至少部分可以用独特的政治局势来解释:在一场重大危机中,临时的少数派政府。