Boelsums Timo Louis, van de Luitgaarden Inge Anna Theresia, Whelan Jane, Poell Hanna, Hoffman Charlotte Maria, Fanoy Ewout, Buskermolen Maaike, Richardus Jan Hendrik
Department of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Amsterdam-Amstelland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Euro Surveill. 2023 Oct;28(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916.
BackgroundContact tracing has been a key component of COVID-19 outbreak control. Backward contact tracing (BCT) aims to trace the source that infected the index case and, thereafter, the cases infected by the source. Modelling studies have suggested BCT will substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in addition to forward contact tracing.AimTo assess the feasibility and impact of adding BCT in practice.MethodsWe identified COVID-19 cases who were already registered in the electronic database between 19 February and 10 March 2021 for routine contact tracing at the Public Health Service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands (pop. 1.3 million). We investigated if, through a structured questionnaire by dedicated contact tracers, we could trace additional sources and cases infected by these sources. Potential sources identified by the index were approached to trace the source's contacts. We evaluated the number of source contacts that could be additionally quarantined.ResultsOf 7,448 COVID-19 cases interviewed in the study period, 47% (n = 3,497) indicated a source that was already registered as a case in the PHS electronic database. A potential, not yet registered source was traced in 13% (n = 979). Backward contact tracing was possible in 62 of 979 cases, from whom an additional 133 potential sources were traced, and four were eligible for tracing of source contacts. Two additional contacts traced had to stay in quarantine for 1 day. No new COVID-19 cases were confirmed.ConclusionsThe addition of manual BCT to control the COVID-19 pandemic did not provide added value in our study setting.
背景
接触者追踪一直是新冠疫情防控的关键组成部分。反向接触者追踪(BCT)旨在追踪感染指示病例的源头,以及此后被该源头感染的病例。建模研究表明,除了正向接触者追踪外,BCT还将大幅减少新冠病毒的传播。
目的
评估在实际操作中增加BCT的可行性和影响。
方法
我们确定了2021年2月19日至3月10日期间已在电子数据库中登记的新冠病例,以便在荷兰鹿特丹 - 莱茵蒙德公共卫生服务局(PHS)(人口130万)进行常规接触者追踪。我们调查了通过专门的接触者追踪人员使用结构化问卷,是否能够追踪到其他源头以及被这些源头感染的病例。对指示病例确定的潜在源头进行接触,以追踪该源头的接触者。我们评估了可以额外进行隔离的源头接触者数量。
结果
在研究期间接受访谈的7448例新冠病例中,47%(n = 3497)指出了一个已在PHS电子数据库中登记为病例的源头。13%(n = 979)的病例追踪到了一个潜在的、尚未登记的源头。在979例病例中的62例中可以进行反向接触者追踪,从中又追踪到了另外133个潜在源头,并且有4个有资格追踪源头接触者。另外追踪到的2名接触者必须隔离1天。没有确诊新的新冠病例。
结论
在我们的研究环境中,增加人工BCT来控制新冠疫情并没有提供额外的价值。