• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2021年2月至3月在荷兰开展的一项试点研究:实际操作中手动反向接触者追踪对控制新冠疫情的价值。

The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.

作者信息

Boelsums Timo Louis, van de Luitgaarden Inge Anna Theresia, Whelan Jane, Poell Hanna, Hoffman Charlotte Maria, Fanoy Ewout, Buskermolen Maaike, Richardus Jan Hendrik

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Amsterdam-Amstelland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Euro Surveill. 2023 Oct;28(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916.

DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916
PMID:37824253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10571494/
Abstract

BackgroundContact tracing has been a key component of COVID-19 outbreak control. Backward contact tracing (BCT) aims to trace the source that infected the index case and, thereafter, the cases infected by the source. Modelling studies have suggested BCT will substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in addition to forward contact tracing.AimTo assess the feasibility and impact of adding BCT in practice.MethodsWe identified COVID-19 cases who were already registered in the electronic database between 19 February and 10 March 2021 for routine contact tracing at the Public Health Service (PHS) of Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands (pop. 1.3 million). We investigated if, through a structured questionnaire by dedicated contact tracers, we could trace additional sources and cases infected by these sources. Potential sources identified by the index were approached to trace the source's contacts. We evaluated the number of source contacts that could be additionally quarantined.ResultsOf 7,448 COVID-19 cases interviewed in the study period, 47% (n = 3,497) indicated a source that was already registered as a case in the PHS electronic database. A potential, not yet registered source was traced in 13% (n = 979). Backward contact tracing was possible in 62 of 979 cases, from whom an additional 133 potential sources were traced, and four were eligible for tracing of source contacts. Two additional contacts traced had to stay in quarantine for 1 day. No new COVID-19 cases were confirmed.ConclusionsThe addition of manual BCT to control the COVID-19 pandemic did not provide added value in our study setting.

摘要

背景

接触者追踪一直是新冠疫情防控的关键组成部分。反向接触者追踪(BCT)旨在追踪感染指示病例的源头,以及此后被该源头感染的病例。建模研究表明,除了正向接触者追踪外,BCT还将大幅减少新冠病毒的传播。

目的

评估在实际操作中增加BCT的可行性和影响。

方法

我们确定了2021年2月19日至3月10日期间已在电子数据库中登记的新冠病例,以便在荷兰鹿特丹 - 莱茵蒙德公共卫生服务局(PHS)(人口130万)进行常规接触者追踪。我们调查了通过专门的接触者追踪人员使用结构化问卷,是否能够追踪到其他源头以及被这些源头感染的病例。对指示病例确定的潜在源头进行接触,以追踪该源头的接触者。我们评估了可以额外进行隔离的源头接触者数量。

结果

在研究期间接受访谈的7448例新冠病例中,47%(n = 3497)指出了一个已在PHS电子数据库中登记为病例的源头。13%(n = 979)的病例追踪到了一个潜在的、尚未登记的源头。在979例病例中的62例中可以进行反向接触者追踪,从中又追踪到了另外133个潜在源头,并且有4个有资格追踪源头接触者。另外追踪到的2名接触者必须隔离1天。没有确诊新的新冠病例。

结论

在我们的研究环境中,增加人工BCT来控制新冠疫情并没有提供额外的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/fa0e31578b6c/2200916-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/da52d9043caf/2200916-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/45a81c8d9fe2/2200916-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/fa0e31578b6c/2200916-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/da52d9043caf/2200916-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/45a81c8d9fe2/2200916-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83cb/10571494/fa0e31578b6c/2200916-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of manual backward contact tracing to control COVID-19 in practice, the Netherlands, February to March 2021: a pilot study.2021年2月至3月在荷兰开展的一项试点研究:实际操作中手动反向接触者追踪对控制新冠疫情的价值。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Oct;28(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2200916.
2
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
3
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Investigation and contact tracing of the first cases of COVID-19 in Mozambique, 2020.2020 年莫桑比克首例新冠肺炎病例的调查和接触者追踪。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Apr 14;41:302. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.302.26979. eCollection 2022.
5
Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Volunteer-Staffed Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Initiative at an Urban Academic Medical Center.设计、实施和评估城市学术医疗中心的志愿者主导的病例调查和接触者追踪计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32110.
6
COVID-19 Contact Tracing as an Indicator for Evaluating a Pandemic Situation: Simulation Study.COVID-19 接触者追踪作为评估大流行情况的指标:模拟研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 6;9:e43836. doi: 10.2196/43836.
7
Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19.关于 COVID-19 后向接触者追踪效率的实证证据。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 13;13(1):4750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6.
8
A University-Led Contact Tracing Program Response to a COVID-19 Outbreak Among Students in Georgia, February-March 2021.佐治亚州大学主导的接触者追踪项目应对 2021 年 2 月至 3 月期间学生中 COVID-19 疫情爆发的情况。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(2_suppl):61S-66S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221113866. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Comparing the efficiency of forward and backward contact tracing.比较正向和反向接触者追踪的效率。
Phys Rev E. 2023 Sep;108(3-1):034308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034308.
10
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor: Added value of backward contact tracing for COVID-19.致编辑的信:新冠病毒病反向接触者追踪的附加价值
Euro Surveill. 2024 Jan;29(4). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.4.2400003.
2
Authors' response: Added value of backward contact tracing for COVID-19.作者回复:新冠病毒病反向接触者追踪的附加价值
Euro Surveill. 2024 Jan;29(4). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.4.2400047.