• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟麻醉同意书讨论显示患者需要高水平的理解能力和教育程度:一项试点研究。

Simulated anesthesia consent discussions demonstrate high level of comprehension and education requirements for patients: A pilot study.

作者信息

Tewfik George, Hesketh Patrick, Chinn Lawrence, Srinivasan Nivetha, Abdelmalek Andrew

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Apr 8;2:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100153. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100153
PMID:37214539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10194181/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient comprehension of informed consent and demonstration of procedural understanding is often lacking in anesthesiology. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient communication in anesthesiology is being conducted effectively, and in a manner that ensures adequate communication between anesthesia professionals and their patients regarding procedures with associated risks and benefits.

METHODS

Anesthesia professionals were recorded in a simulated setting explaining anesthesia procedures of increasing complexity with one control scenario. Score means were calculated, and statistical comparisons made between discussion of anesthesia procedures and the control scenario.

RESULTS

Calculation of means for 6 readability tests demonstrated the grade level required to understand the medical practitioners' verbal communication was high and increased with complexity of the anesthesia procedure described. The control scenario required a statistically significant lower level of comprehension for the recipient of the information.

CONCLUSION

In simulated settings, anesthesia professionals regularly communicate procedural details in a manner that is difficult for the general public to understand. Subjects could communicate in simple terms when discussing a control.

INNOVATION

This pilot study demonstrated effective methodology, using artificial intelligence technology for transcription, to assess patient comprehension of verbal communication.

摘要

目的

在麻醉学领域,患者对知情同意的理解以及对手术流程的理解往往不足。本研究的目的是确定麻醉学中与患者的沟通是否有效,以及其方式能否确保麻醉专业人员与患者就具有相关风险和益处的手术进行充分沟通。

方法

在模拟场景中记录麻醉专业人员解释复杂度不断增加的麻醉手术过程,同时设置一个对照场景。计算得分均值,并对麻醉手术讨论与对照场景进行统计比较。

结果

6项可读性测试的均值计算表明,理解医生口头交流所需的年级水平较高,且随着所描述麻醉手术复杂度的增加而提高。对照场景中信息接收者所需的理解水平在统计学上显著更低。

结论

在模拟场景中,麻醉专业人员通常以普通公众难以理解的方式传达手术细节。在讨论对照场景时,受试者能够用简单的语言进行交流。

创新点

这项初步研究展示了一种有效的方法,即使用人工智能技术进行转录,以评估患者对口头交流的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965d/10194181/6c110b2dacf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965d/10194181/6c110b2dacf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965d/10194181/6c110b2dacf8/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulated anesthesia consent discussions demonstrate high level of comprehension and education requirements for patients: A pilot study.模拟麻醉同意书讨论显示患者需要高水平的理解能力和教育程度:一项试点研究。
PEC Innov. 2023 Apr 8;2:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100153. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology.小儿麻醉学中的知情同意
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1253-1260. doi: 10.1111/pan.13270. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.干预措施以提高患者对医疗和手术程序知情同意的理解:系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):151-73. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364247. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
5
Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.基于互联网的麻醉学领域患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
Language use in the informed consent discussion for emergency procedures.知情同意讨论中用于急诊程序的语言使用。
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(4):315-20. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.715257.
7
Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.白内障手术的知情同意:患者对口头、书面和录像信息的理解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
8
Informed Consent in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.小儿麻醉知情同意:叙述性综述。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Dec;127(6):1398-1405. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003705.
9
Teaching Anesthesiology Residents How to Obtain Informed Consent.教麻醉科住院医师如何获得知情同意。
J Educ Perioper Med. 2019 Oct 1;21(4):E632. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
10
Patient comprehension necessary for informed consent for vascular procedures is poor and related to frailty.患者对血管手术的知情同意理解能力较差,且与虚弱有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1422-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.131. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence in consent: the use of a patient information leaflet as a tool for consent for regional anaesthesia - a service improvement project.对同意的信心:使用患者信息手册作为区域麻醉同意的工具——一项服务改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 17;14(2):e003241. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003241.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Readability of Anesthesia-Related Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Organizations.评估主要麻醉学组织的麻醉相关患者教育材料的可读性。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 13;2022:3284199. doi: 10.1155/2022/3284199. eCollection 2022.
2
Patients' satisfaction and associated factors towards preoperative informed consent process: A cross-sectional study.患者对术前知情同意过程的满意度及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jun 30;79:104104. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104104. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon.
在进行重大骨科手术前查看了决策辅助工具的患者报告称,他们对自己的外科医生的信任度更高。
JB JS Open Access. 2022 Mar 24;7(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00149. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis.爱尔兰和英国临床研究患者信息手册及同意书的可读性与可理解性:一项回顾性定量分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e037994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994.
5
Teaching Anesthesiology Residents How to Obtain Informed Consent.教麻醉科住院医师如何获得知情同意。
J Educ Perioper Med. 2019 Oct 1;21(4):E632. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
6
Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.干预措施以提高患者对医疗和外科手术知情同意的理解:更新的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
[Informed consent for anaesthesia: Presential or non-presential information?].[麻醉知情同意:现场告知还是非现场告知?]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(6):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Assessment of Use, Specificity, and Readability of Written Clinical Informed Consent Forms for Patients With Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.接受放疗的癌症患者书面临床知情同意书的使用、特异性及可读性评估
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;5(8):e190260. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0260. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
[Obtaining Informed Consent for Anesthesia in Elective Surgery at a Tertiary-Care Hospital: Practices and Ethical-Legal Context].[在三级医院进行择期手术麻醉的知情同意获取:实践与伦理法律背景]
Acta Med Port. 2019 Feb 1;32(1):53-60. doi: 10.20344/amp.10592.
10
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology.小儿麻醉学中的知情同意
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1253-1260. doi: 10.1111/pan.13270. Epub 2017 Oct 26.