• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视推特话语中公众对与美国最高法院裁决相关的种族态度:一种机器学习方法。

Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court ruling: A machine learning approach.

作者信息

Ujah Otobo I, Olaore Pelumi, Nnorom Onome C, Ogbu Chukwuemeka E, Kirby Russell S

机构信息

College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.

Department of Community Medicine, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.

出版信息

Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 4;4:1149441. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441
PMID:37214560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10193152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision of the US Supreme Court to repeal sparked significant media attention. Although primarily related to abortion, opinions are divided about how this decision would impact disparities, especially for Black, Indigenous, and people of color. We used advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques to examine ethno-racial contents in Twitter discourses related to the overturn of .

METHODS

We screened approximately 3 million tweets posted to discussions and identified unique tweets in English-language that had mentions related to race, ethnicity, and racism posted between June 24 and July 10, 2022. We performed lexicon-based sentiment analysis to identify sentiment polarity and the emotions expressed in the Twitter discourse and conducted structural topic modeling to identify and examine latent themes.

RESULTS

Of the tweets retrieved, 0.7% (= 23,044) had mentions related to race, ethnicity, and racism. The overall sentiment polarity was negative (mean = -0.41, SD = 1.48). Approximately 60.0% (= 12,092) expressed negative sentiments, while 39.0% (= 81,45) expressed positive sentiments, and 3.0% (= 619) expressed neutral sentiments. There were 20 latent themes which emerged from the topic model. The predominant topics in the discourses were related to "racial resentment" (topic 2, 11.3%), "human rights" (topic 2, 7.9%), and "socioeconomic disadvantage" (topic 16, 7.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates wide ranging ethno-racial concerns following the reversal of and supports the need for active surveillance of racial and ethnic disparities in abortion access in the post- era.

摘要

背景

美国最高法院推翻(某项裁决)的决定引发了媒体的广泛关注。尽管该决定主要与堕胎相关,但对于这一决定将如何影响差异,尤其是对黑人、原住民和有色人种的差异,人们看法不一。我们使用先进的自然语言处理(NLP)技术来研究与(某项裁决)推翻相关的推特话语中的种族内容。

方法

我们筛选了发布到(相关)讨论中的约300万条推文,并识别出2022年6月24日至7月10日期间发布的、包含与种族、族裔和种族主义相关提及的英文独特推文。我们进行了基于词典的情感分析,以确定推特话语中表达的情感极性和情绪,并进行了结构主题建模,以识别和检查潜在主题。

结果

在检索到的推文中,0.7%(=23,044条)包含与种族、族裔和种族主义相关的提及。总体情感极性为负面(均值=-0.41,标准差=1.48)。约60.0%(=12,092条)表达了负面情绪,而39.0%(=8,145条)表达了正面情绪,3.0%(=619条)表达了中性情绪。主题模型中出现了20个潜在主题。话语中的主要主题与“种族怨恨”(主题2,11.3%)、“人权”(主题2,7.9%)和“社会经济劣势”(主题16,7.4%)相关。

结论

我们的研究表明,(某项裁决)被推翻后存在广泛的种族问题,并支持在(该裁决)后的时代积极监测堕胎服务中种族和族裔差异的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/d5569bf70d25/fgwh-04-1149441-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/954c4a3a7bb3/fgwh-04-1149441-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/3b4ed57568bb/fgwh-04-1149441-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/e071d8e28613/fgwh-04-1149441-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/933e2820afac/fgwh-04-1149441-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/8f0f3adb41a7/fgwh-04-1149441-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/d42ef6e96e6f/fgwh-04-1149441-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/d5569bf70d25/fgwh-04-1149441-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/954c4a3a7bb3/fgwh-04-1149441-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/3b4ed57568bb/fgwh-04-1149441-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/e071d8e28613/fgwh-04-1149441-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/933e2820afac/fgwh-04-1149441-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/8f0f3adb41a7/fgwh-04-1149441-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/d42ef6e96e6f/fgwh-04-1149441-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b572/10193152/d5569bf70d25/fgwh-04-1149441-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court ruling: A machine learning approach.审视推特话语中公众对与美国最高法院裁决相关的种族态度:一种机器学习方法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 4;4:1149441. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.近期堕胎立法对 Twitter 用户参与度、情绪以及对临床医生的信任和健康信息隐私的表达的影响:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e46655. doi: 10.2196/46655.
3
Examination of the Public's Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans.审视公众在推特上对罗诉韦德案被推翻及堕胎禁令的反应。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;10(12):2390. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122390.
4
Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.“多布斯诉杰克逊案”最高法院裁决后,推特上的堕胎药营销和供应。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2024 Aug;29(4):139-144. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2024.2354868. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Examining Twitter-Derived Negative Racial Sentiment as Indicators of Cultural Racism: Observational Associations With Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight Among a Multiracial Sample of Mothers, 2011-2021.考察推特衍生的负面种族情绪作为文化种族主义的指标:2011-2021 年间,多民族母亲样本中与早产和低出生体重的观察性关联。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 28;25:e44990. doi: 10.2196/44990.
6
"Is a game really a reason for people to die?" Sentiment and thematic analysis of Twitter-based discourse on Indonesia soccer stampede.“一场比赛真的是人们丧命的理由吗?” 基于推特的关于印尼足球踩踏事件的话语情感与主题分析
AIMS Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;10(4):739-754. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023050. eCollection 2023.
7
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
8
The Association Between State-Level Racial Attitudes Assessed From Twitter Data and Adverse Birth Outcomes: Observational Study.从 Twitter 数据评估的州级种族态度与不良生育结局之间的关联:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 6;6(3):e17103. doi: 10.2196/17103.
9
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
10
Examining Rural and Urban Sentiment Difference in COVID-19-Related Topics on Twitter: Word Embedding-Based Retrospective Study.考察 Twitter 上与 COVID-19 相关主题的城乡情绪差异:基于词嵌入的回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 15;25:e42985. doi: 10.2196/42985.

引用本文的文献

1
"Is a game really a reason for people to die?" Sentiment and thematic analysis of Twitter-based discourse on Indonesia soccer stampede.“一场比赛真的是人们丧命的理由吗?” 基于推特的关于印尼足球踩踏事件的话语情感与主题分析
AIMS Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;10(4):739-754. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023050. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Did the public attribute the Flint Water Crisis to racism as it was happening? Text analysis of Twitter data to examine causal attributions to racism during a public health crisis.在弗林特水危机发生时,公众是否将其归因于种族主义?对推特数据进行文本分析,以研究在公共卫生危机期间对种族主义的因果归因。
J Comput Soc Sci. 2023 Apr;6(1):165-190. doi: 10.1007/s42001-022-00192-6. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
2
Examination of the Public's Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans.审视公众在推特上对罗诉韦德案被推翻及堕胎禁令的反应。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;10(12):2390. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122390.
3
Reflections on abortion rights: From policy to medicine.
关于堕胎权的思考:从政策到医学。
Biosci Trends. 2022 Dec 26;16(6):455-458. doi: 10.5582/bst.2022.01354. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
"They're forcing people to have children that they can't afford": a qualitative study of social support and capital among individuals receiving an abortion in Georgia.“他们迫使人们去生育他们负担不起的孩子”:佐治亚州堕胎人群的社会支持和资本的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115547. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115547. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
5
Global impacts of and abortion regression in the United States.美国堕胎率下降的全球影响。 (你提供的原文“Global impacts of and abortion regression in the United States.”中“of”后面似乎缺少内容,这是按照纠正后理解翻译的。)
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2135574. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2135574.
6
"": a qualitative, community-led medication abortion study with Black and Latinx Women in Georgia, USA.“”: 一项在美国佐治亚州针对黑人和拉丁裔女性的定性、社区主导的药物流产研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2129686. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2129686.
7
Text mining for social science - The state and the future of computational text analysis in sociology.文本挖掘在社会科学中的应用——社会学中计算文本分析的现状与未来。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Nov;108:102784. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102784. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
8
Identifying accurate pro-choice and pro-life identity labels in Spanish: Social media insights and implications for comparative survey research.识别西班牙语中准确的支持选择和支持生命的身份标签:社交媒体的洞察及其对比较调查研究的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;54(4):166-176. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12208. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter.推特上“黑人的命也是命”运动中的注意力与反框架构建
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):367. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01384-1. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
10
Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?推翻罗诉韦德案是否歧视有色人种女性?
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):952-956. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108504. Epub 2022 Sep 30.