• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察 Twitter 上与 COVID-19 相关主题的城乡情绪差异:基于词嵌入的回顾性研究。

Examining Rural and Urban Sentiment Difference in COVID-19-Related Topics on Twitter: Word Embedding-Based Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 15;25:e42985. doi: 10.2196/42985.

DOI:10.2196/42985
PMID:36790847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9937112/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

By the end of 2022, more than 100 million people were infected with COVID-19 in the United States, and the cumulative death rate in rural areas (383.5/100,000) was much higher than in urban areas (280.1/100,000). As the pandemic spread, people used social media platforms to express their opinions and concerns about COVID-19-related topics.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) identify the primary COVID-19-related topics in the contiguous United States communicated over Twitter and (2) compare the sentiments urban and rural users expressed about these topics.

METHODS

We collected tweets containing geolocation data from May 2020 to January 2022 in the contiguous United States. We relied on the tweets' geolocations to determine if their authors were in an urban or rural setting. We trained multiple word2vec models with several corpora of tweets based on geospatial and timing information. Using a word2vec model built on all tweets, we identified hashtags relevant to COVID-19 and performed hashtag clustering to obtain related topics. We then ran an inference analysis for urban and rural sentiments with respect to the topics based on the similarity between topic hashtags and opinion adjectives in the corresponding urban and rural word2vec models. Finally, we analyzed the temporal trend in sentiments using monthly word2vec models.

RESULTS

We created a corpus of 407 million tweets, 350 million (86%) of which were posted by users in urban areas, while 18 million (4.4%) were posted by users in rural areas. There were 2666 hashtags related to COVID-19, which clustered into 20 topics. Rural users expressed stronger negative sentiments than urban users about COVID-19 prevention strategies and vaccination (P<.001). Moreover, there was a clear political divide in the perception of politicians by urban and rural users; these users communicated stronger negative sentiments about Republican and Democratic politicians, respectively (P<.001). Regarding misinformation and conspiracy theories, urban users exhibited stronger negative sentiments about the "covidiots" and "China virus" topics, while rural users exhibited stronger negative sentiments about the "Dr. Fauci" and "plandemic" topics. Finally, we observed that urban users' sentiments about the economy appeared to transition from negative to positive in late 2021, which was in line with the US economic recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates there is a statistically significant difference in the sentiments of urban and rural Twitter users regarding a wide range of COVID-19-related topics. This suggests that social media can be relied upon to monitor public sentiment during pandemics in disparate types of regions. This may assist in the geographically targeted deployment of epidemic prevention and management efforts.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/8d43dd4b28d5/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/8835105dccbb/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/d4c3bf9357c2/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/188fa525b86c/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/3064cc2424d7/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/1bdf54379097/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/8d43dd4b28d5/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/8835105dccbb/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/d4c3bf9357c2/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/188fa525b86c/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/3064cc2424d7/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/1bdf54379097/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1b/9937112/8d43dd4b28d5/jmir_v25i1e42985_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

截至 2022 年底,美国已有超过 1 亿人感染 COVID-19,农村地区的累计死亡率(383.5/10 万)远高于城市地区(280.1/10 万)。随着疫情的蔓延,人们开始利用社交媒体平台表达他们对 COVID-19 相关话题的看法和担忧。

目的

本研究旨在:(1)确定美国大陆地区通过 Twitter 传播的主要 COVID-19 相关话题;(2)比较城乡用户对这些话题的情绪。

方法

我们收集了 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 1 月在美国大陆地区带有地理位置数据的推文。我们根据推文的地理位置来确定其作者所在的是城市还是农村地区。我们利用基于地理位置和时间信息的多个 tweets 语料库训练了多个 word2vec 模型。我们利用基于所有推文的 word2vec 模型,识别出与 COVID-19 相关的标签,并通过标签聚类获得相关话题。然后,我们根据城市和农村 word2vec 模型中话题标签和对应意见形容词之间的相似性,对城市和农村用户的情绪进行了推断分析。最后,我们利用月度 word2vec 模型分析了情绪的时间趋势。

结果

我们创建了一个包含 4 亿条推文的语料库,其中 3.5 亿条(86%)是由城市地区的用户发布的,而 1800 万条(4.4%)是由农村地区的用户发布的。共有 2666 个与 COVID-19 相关的标签,聚类为 20 个话题。农村用户对 COVID-19 预防策略和疫苗接种的负面情绪比城市用户更强(P<.001)。此外,城乡用户对政客的看法存在明显的政治分歧;他们分别对共和党和民主党政客表达了更强的负面情绪(P<.001)。关于错误信息和阴谋论,城市用户对“covidiots”和“中国病毒”话题表现出更强的负面情绪,而农村用户对“Dr. Fauci”和“plandemic”话题表现出更强的负面情绪。最后,我们观察到,城市用户对经济的情绪似乎在 2021 年底从负面转向正面,这与美国经济复苏一致。

结论

本研究表明,城乡 Twitter 用户在广泛的 COVID-19 相关话题上的情绪存在统计学上的显著差异。这表明社交媒体可以用来监测不同类型地区的公众情绪。这可能有助于在地理上有针对性地部署防疫和管理工作。

相似文献

1
Examining Rural and Urban Sentiment Difference in COVID-19-Related Topics on Twitter: Word Embedding-Based Retrospective Study.考察 Twitter 上与 COVID-19 相关主题的城乡情绪差异:基于词嵌入的回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 15;25:e42985. doi: 10.2196/42985.
2
Tweet Topics and Sentiments Relating to COVID-19 Vaccination Among Australian Twitter Users: Machine Learning Analysis.澳大利亚推特用户与 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的推文主题和情绪:机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e26953. doi: 10.2196/26953.
3
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
4
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
5
Emotions and Topics Expressed on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Comparative Geolocation and Text Mining Analysis.在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间在 Twitter 上表达的情绪和主题:比较地理定位和文本挖掘分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e40323. doi: 10.2196/40323.
6
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
7
Examining Public Sentiments and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Infoveillance Study Using Twitter Posts.审视公众对新冠疫苗接种的情绪和态度:利用推特帖子的信息监测研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Apr 15;2(1):e33909. doi: 10.2196/33909. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
8
Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis.公众对新冠疫苗关注的话题和情绪:社交媒体趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 21;23(10):e30765. doi: 10.2196/30765.
9
Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study.利用标签#scamdemic 和 #plandemic 分析推特上的 COVID-19 虚假信息:回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0268409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268409. eCollection 2022.
10
Using Twitter to Examine Web-Based Patient Experience Sentiments in the United States: Longitudinal Study.利用推特研究美国基于网络的患者体验情绪:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 12;20(10):e10043. doi: 10.2196/10043.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Rates by Rural and Urban Areas: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.量化农村和城市地区 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的差异:横断面观察研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 19;10:e50595. doi: 10.2196/50595.
2
Fatigue, Pain, and Medication: Mining Online Posts Regarding Rheumatoid Arthritis From Reddit.疲劳、疼痛和药物:从 Reddit 挖掘有关类风湿关节炎的在线帖子。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:754-763. eCollection 2023.
3
Wastewater-Informed Digital Advertising as a COVID-19 Geotargeted Neighborhood Intervention: Jefferson County, Kentucky, 2021-2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Implicit Incentives Among Reddit Users to Prioritize Attention Over Privacy and Reveal Their Faces When Discussing Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results: Topic and Attention Analysis.Reddit用户中存在的隐性激励因素:在讨论直接面向消费者的基因检测结果时,优先考虑关注度而非隐私并透露自己的面容——主题与关注度分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 3;2(2):e35702. doi: 10.2196/35702. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
The Public Perception of the #GeneEditedBabies Event Across Multiple Social Media Platforms: Observational Study.多个社交媒体平台上公众对#基因编辑婴儿事件的认知:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e31687. doi: 10.2196/31687.
3
基于污水数据的数字化广告作为一项新冠疫情地理靶向社区干预措施:肯塔基州杰斐逊县,2021-2022 年。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jan;114(1):34-37. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307439. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
4
Using wastewater to overcome health disparities among rural residents.利用废水消除农村居民之间的健康差距。
Geoforum. 2023 Aug;144:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103816. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets.COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:利用环境深度神经网络、文本挖掘的情感分类和 COVID-19 疫苗推文的情绪反应进行全球公共卫生和风险建模的框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 12;20(10):5803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105803.
Targeting COVID Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural Communities in Tennessee: Implications for Extending the COVID-19 Pandemic in the South.
针对田纳西州农村社区的新冠疫苗犹豫问题:对南方新冠疫情蔓延的影响
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 4;9(11):1279. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111279.
4
The Longest Month: Analyzing COVID-19 Vaccination Opinions Dynamics From Tweets in the Month Following the First Vaccine Announcement.最长的一个月:分析首次宣布疫苗后的一个月内推特上关于新冠疫苗接种意见的动态变化
IEEE Access. 2021 Feb 16;9:33203-33223. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059821. eCollection 2021.
5
Monitoring Depression Trends on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.新冠疫情期间推特上抑郁症趋势的监测:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Jul 18;1(1):e26769. doi: 10.2196/26769. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Meaningful messaging: Sentiment in elite social media communication with the public on the COVID-19 pandemic.有意义的信息传递:精英阶层在社交媒体上与公众就新冠疫情进行沟通时的情绪
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 14;7(29). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg2898. Print 2021 Jul.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.新冠疫苗相关推文的讨论:主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e24435. doi: 10.2196/24435.
8
Dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in urban and rural areas in the United States.美国城乡地区新冠疫情动态
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596. eCollection 2021.
10
Joining the herd? U.S. public opinion and vaccination requirements across educational settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.加入群体?美国公众意见和 COVID-19 大流行期间教育环境中的疫苗接种要求。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2375-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 Mar 23.