Liu Sze Yan, Benny Claire, Grinshteyn Erin, Ehntholt Amy, Cook Daniel, Pabayo Roman
Department of Public Health, Montclair State University, Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ, 07043, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 May 12;23:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101428. eCollection 2023 Sep.
This study examines whether living in US states with (1) restrictive reproductive rights and (2) restrictive abortion laws is associated with frequent mental health distress among women.
We operationalize reproductive rights using an overall state-level measure of reproductive rights as well as a state-level measure of restrictive abortion laws. We merged data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) with these state-level exposure variables and other state-level information. We used multilevel logistic regression to assess the relationship between these two measures and the likelihood of reporting 14 or more days of frequent mental health distress. We also tested whether associations differed across race, household income, education, and marital status.
In the adjusted models, a standard deviation-unit increase in the reproductive rights score was significantly associated with decreased odds of reporting frequent mental health distress (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91, 0.99). Women in states with very hostile abortion restrictions had higher odds of frequent mental health distress. Associations between state-level abortion restrictions were larger among women 25-34 years old and women with a high school degree. For example, women aged 25-34 years residing in moderate (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.14, 2.04), hostile (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.15, 2.18), and very hostile (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.64) states were more likely to report frequent mental health distress than women living in states with less restrictive abortion policies.
We found the association between state-level restrictions on reproductive rights and abortion access and frequent mental health distress differed by age and socioeconomic status. These results suggest abortion rights restrictions may contribute to mental health inequities among women.
本研究探讨生活在美国具有(1)限制生殖权利和(2)限制堕胎法律的州的女性是否经常出现心理健康困扰。
我们使用州层面的生殖权利综合衡量指标以及州层面的限制堕胎法律衡量指标来实施生殖权利的操作化。我们将2018年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的数据与这些州层面的暴露变量及其他州层面信息进行合并。我们使用多层逻辑回归来评估这两个衡量指标与报告14天及以上频繁心理健康困扰可能性之间的关系。我们还测试了不同种族、家庭收入、教育程度和婚姻状况之间的关联是否存在差异。
在调整后的模型中,生殖权利得分每增加一个标准差单位,报告频繁心理健康困扰的几率显著降低(OR = 0.95,95% CI = 0.91,0.99)。堕胎限制非常严格的州的女性出现频繁心理健康困扰的几率更高。州层面堕胎限制与心理健康困扰之间的关联在25 - 34岁的女性和高中学历的女性中更为明显。例如,居住在中度(OR = 1.54,95% CI = 1.14,2.04)、敌对(OR = 1.59,95% CI = 1.15,2.18)和非常敌对(OR = 1.29,95% CI = 1.02,1.64)州的25 - 34岁女性比居住在堕胎政策限制较少州的女性更有可能报告频繁心理健康困扰。
我们发现州层面生殖权利和堕胎获取限制与频繁心理健康困扰之间的关联因年龄和社会经济地位而异。这些结果表明堕胎权利限制可能导致女性心理健康的不平等。