Hall Stephanie V, Pangori Andrea, Jacobson Davies Faelan, Tilea Anca, Owda Rieham, Zivin Kara, Dalton Vanessa
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jun;34(6):835-842. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0533.
Abortion services represent a critical component of reproductive health care. Barriers to a full range of reproductive health care may harm mental health. We sought to determine whether restrictive state-level abortion policies increase the risk of perinatal depression, overall and among women with intended and unintended pregnancies. This cross-sectional analysis used surveillance data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System. Restrictive state-level abortion policies were measured using the Guttmacher Abortion Policy Hostility Index. The primary outcome of interest was incident perinatal depression, measured as a self-reported diagnosis of depression during pregnancy or a positive 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire during the postpartum period. Women living in states with highly restrictive abortion policies experienced 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.37) times greater odds of perinatal depression compared to women living in states with less restrictive abortion policies after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, maternal education, marital status, and insurance type. Women with unintended pregnancies had a higher predicted probability of perinatal depression than women with intended pregnancies in both highly restrictive states (17.3%, 95% CI: 13.9 - 21.3% versus 14.8%, 95% CI: 10.7 - 16.9%) and in less restrictive states (14.8%, 95% CI: 11.7 - 18.5% versus 11.3%, 95% CI: 9.0 - 14.2%). Restrictive state-level abortion policies were associated with an increased risk of perinatal depression regardless of pregnancy intent. Abortion restrictions may contribute to poor mental health outcomes directly, by obstructing access to wanted abortion services, or indirectly, as a marker for states that do not fully support delivering women with adequate health or social services. The mental health of the birthing population represents an important consideration for evolving reproductive health policies.
堕胎服务是生殖健康护理的一个关键组成部分。全面生殖健康护理的障碍可能会损害心理健康。我们试图确定州一级的限制性堕胎政策是否会增加围产期抑郁症的风险,包括总体风险以及有意和意外怀孕女性中的风险。这项横断面分析使用了来自妊娠风险评估与监测系统的监测数据。州一级的限制性堕胎政策使用古特马赫堕胎政策敌意指数进行衡量。主要关注的结果是围产期抑郁症的发病情况,通过孕期自我报告的抑郁症诊断或产后2项患者健康问卷呈阳性来衡量。在调整了年龄、种族/族裔、产妇教育程度、婚姻状况和保险类型后,与生活在堕胎政策限制较少州的女性相比,生活在堕胎政策高度限制州的女性患围产期抑郁症的几率高出1.23倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.12 - 1.37)。在堕胎政策高度限制州和限制较少州,意外怀孕女性患围产期抑郁症的预测概率均高于有意怀孕女性(分别为17.3%,95% CI:13.9 - 21.3% 与14.8%,95% CI:10.7 - 16.9%;以及14.8%,95% CI:11.7 - 18.5% 与11.3%,95% CI:9.0 - 14.2%)。无论怀孕意图如何,州一级的限制性堕胎政策都与围产期抑郁症风险增加有关。堕胎限制可能直接导致心理健康状况不佳,因为它阻碍了获得所需的堕胎服务,或者间接导致,因为它是那些不完全支持为女性提供足够健康或社会服务的州的一个标志。分娩人群的心理健康是不断发展的生殖健康政策的一个重要考虑因素。