Suppr超能文献

早期肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of Early Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Hospitalized Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 May 15;18:881-893. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S397361. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) effectively improves symptoms and exercise ability in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the effectiveness and timing of early PR on hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is still debated.

METHODS

This study conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcome benefits between early PR and usual care for patient hospitalized due to AECOPD. A systematic search was performed for retrieving randomized control trials (RCTs) from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library until November 2021. RCTs reporting early PR for AECOPD with hospitalization, either during admission or within four weeks of discharge, were enrolled for systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty RCTs (1274 participants) were included. Early PR showed significantly improved readmission rate (ten trials, risk ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.92), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD, twelve trials, MD 59.73, 95% CI 36.34-83.12), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (eight trials, MD -10.65, 95% CI -14.78 to -6.52), Borg score (eight trials, MD -0.79, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.32), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (eight trials, MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.25). However, the trend of mortality (six trials, risk ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.39-1.34) benefit was not significant. The subgroup analysis showed non-significant trends of better effect in early PR during admission than those after discharge for outcomes of 6MWD, quality of life, and dyspnea. However, non-significant trends of less benefits on mortality and readmission rate were found in early PR during the admission.

CONCLUSION

Overall, early PR is beneficial for AECOPD with hospitalization, and there was no significant outcome difference between PR initiated during admission or within 4 weeks of discharge.

摘要

背景

肺康复(PR)可有效改善稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的症状和运动能力。然而,对于因急性加重期 COPD(AECOPD)住院的患者,早期 PR 的有效性和时机仍存在争议。

方法

本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了早期 PR 与常规护理对因 AECOPD 住院的患者的疗效。系统检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以检索截至 2021 年 11 月的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入了报告对住院的 AECOPD 患者进行早期 PR 的 RCT,无论是在入院期间还是在出院后 4 周内。对纳入的 RCT 进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 20 项 RCT(1274 名参与者)。早期 PR 可显著降低再入院率(10 项试验,风险比 0.68,95%置信区间[CI] 0.50-0.92)、6 分钟步行距离(12 项试验,MD 59.73,95%CI 36.34-83.12)、圣乔治呼吸问卷评分(8 项试验,MD-10.65,95%CI-14.78 至-6.52)、Borg 评分(8 项试验,MD-0.79,95%CI-1.26 至-0.32)和改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(8 项试验,MD-0.38,95%CI-0.5 至-0.25)。然而,死亡率(6 项试验,风险比 0.72,95%CI 0.39-1.34)的获益趋势并不显著。亚组分析显示,在住院期间开始早期 PR 对 6MWD、生活质量和呼吸困难等结局的效果要好于出院后开始早期 PR,但在住院期间开始早期 PR 对死亡率和再入院率的获益较小,差异无统计学意义。

结论

总体而言,早期 PR 对住院的 AECOPD 患者有益,在住院期间开始 PR 与在出院后 4 周内开始 PR 的结局无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2517/10198174/12b22d9b74e4/COPD-18-881-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验