Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; EDPFM, UR-UM212, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023 Sep;64:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102271. Epub 2023 May 13.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the post-mortem outer ear temperature (OET) on the measurement bias previously observed for short post-mortem intervals (PMI) between a commercially available infrared thermometer and a reference metal probe thermometer. To that end, 100 refrigerated bodies were added to our initial cohort to investigate lower OET. In contrast to our previous findings, a very good concordance was noted between both methods. There was still an overall underestimation of ear temperatures with the infrared thermometer, but the average bias was significantly reduced compared to that observed in the initial cohort (1.47 °C for the right ear and 1.32 °C for the left ear). Most importantly, this bias progressively decreased as the OET decreased, becoming negligible for OET lower than 20 °C. These results are in agreement with literature data regarding these temperature ranges. The discrepancy observed with our previous observations may be due to the technical characteristics of the infrared thermometers. The lower the temperatures measured, the more the measurements approach the lower limit of the measuring range of the device and tend to give constant values, resulting in a smaller underestimation of the measurements. Further research is needed to assess the interest of integrating in the already validated OET-based formulae a variable dependent on the temperature measured with the infrared thermometer, to eventually allow infrared thermometry to be used for PMI estimation in forensic practice.
本研究旨在评估死后外耳温度 (OET) 对先前观察到的短死后间隔 (PMI) 之间商业红外温度计和参考金属探头温度计之间测量偏差的影响。为此,将 100 具冷藏尸体添加到我们的初始队列中以研究较低的 OET。与我们之前的发现相比,两种方法之间非常吻合。红外温度计仍然存在耳温总体低估,但与初始队列观察到的平均偏差相比,平均偏差显著降低(右耳为 1.47°C,左耳为 1.32°C)。最重要的是,随着 OET 的降低,该偏差逐渐减小,当 OET 低于 20°C 时,该偏差变得可以忽略不计。这些结果与文献中关于这些温度范围的数据一致。与我们之前的观察结果不一致的原因可能是由于红外温度计的技术特点。测量的温度越低,测量值越接近设备测量范围的下限,并且趋于给出恒定值,从而导致测量值的低估较小。需要进一步研究来评估在已经验证的基于 OET 的公式中集成依赖于红外温度计测量的温度的变量的意义,以便最终允许红外测温法在法医学实践中用于 PMI 估计。