William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Mar 1;10(2):132-142. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad029.
This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank.
Baseline participant demographic, clinical, laboratory, anthropometric, and imaging characteristics were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke for men and women. Women-to-men ratios of hazard ratios (RHRs), and related 95% confidence intervals, represent the relative effect-size magnitude by sex.
Among the 363 313 participants (53.5% women), 8470 experienced MI (29.9% women) and 7705 experienced stroke (40.1% women) over 12.66 [11.93, 13.38] years of prospective follow-up. Men had greater risk factor burden and higher arterial stiffness index at baseline. Women had greater age-related decline in aortic distensibility. Older age [RHR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)], greater deprivation [RHR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03)], hypertension [RHR: 1.14 (1.02-1.27)], and current smoking [RHR: 1.45 (1.27-1.66)] were associated with a greater excess risk of MI in women than men. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with excess MI risk in men [RHR: 0.90 (0.84-0.95)] and apolipoprotein A (ApoA) was less protective for MI in women [RHR: 1.65 (1.01-2.71)]. Older age was associated with excess risk of stroke [RHR: 1.01 (1.00-1.02)] and ApoA was less protective for stroke in women [RHR: 2.55 (1.58-4.14)].
Older age, hypertension, and smoking appeared stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics appeared stronger risk determinants for men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive strategies and suggest priority targets for intervention in men and women.
本研究旨在英国生物银行(UKB)人群中,检验血管危险因素与心血管事件发生之间的性别差异。
收集基线参与者的人口统计学、临床、实验室、人体测量学和影像学特征。多变量 Cox 回归用于估计血管危险因素与男性和女性心肌梗死(MI)和缺血性卒中事件的独立关联。危害比(HR)的男女比值(RHR)及其相关的 95%置信区间,代表按性别划分的相对效应大小。
在 363313 名参与者中(53.5%为女性),8470 人经历了 MI(29.9%为女性),7705 人经历了卒中(40.1%为女性),随访时间为 12.66 年[11.93,13.38]。男性基线时的危险因素负担和动脉僵硬度指数更高。女性的主动脉顺应性随年龄的增长而下降更为明显。年龄较大[RHR:1.02(1.01-1.03)]、贫困程度较高[RHR:1.02(1.00-1.03)]、高血压[RHR:1.14(1.02-1.27)]和当前吸烟[RHR:1.45(1.27-1.66)]与女性发生 MI 的风险增加有关。与男性相比,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与 MI 风险增加相关[RHR:0.90(0.84-0.95)],载脂蛋白 A(ApoA)对女性 MI 的保护作用降低[RHR:1.65(1.01-2.71)]。年龄较大与卒中风险增加相关[RHR:1.01(1.00-1.02)],ApoA 对女性卒中的保护作用降低[RHR:2.55(1.58-4.14)]。
年龄较大、高血压和吸烟似乎是女性心血管疾病的更强驱动因素,而血脂指标似乎是男性的更强风险决定因素。这些发现强调了针对男性和女性制定特定性别预防策略的重要性,并提示了干预的优先目标。