• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国住院COVID-19患者使用瑞德西韦:医疗资源优化

Remdesivir for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in the United States: Optimization of Health Care Resources.

作者信息

Barnieh Lianne, Beckerman Rachel, Jeyakumar Sushanth, Hsiao Alice, Jarrett James, Gottlieb Robert L

机构信息

Maple Health Group, New York, NY, USA.

Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.

出版信息

Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jun;12(6):1655-1665. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00816-y. Epub 2023 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s40121-023-00816-y
PMID:37222933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10206585/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In addition to significant morbidity and mortality, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has strained health care systems globally. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir + standard of care (SOC) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the USA.

METHODS

This cost-effectiveness analysis considered direct and indirect costs of remdesivir + SOC versus SOC alone among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US. Patients entered the model stratified according to their baseline ordinal score. At day 15, patients could transition to another health state, and on day 29, they were assumed to have either died or been discharged. Patients were then followed over a 1-year time horizon, where they could transition to death or be rehospitalized.

RESULTS

Treatment with remdesivir + SOC avoided, per patient, a total of 4 hospitalization days: two general ward days and a day for both the intensive care unit and the intensive care unit plus invasive mechanical ventilation compared to SOC alone. Treatment with remdesivir + SOC presented net cost savings due to lower hospitalization and lost productivity costs compared to SOC alone. In increased and decreased hospital capacity scenarios, remdesivir + SOC resulted in more beds and ventilators being available versus SOC alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Remdesivir + SOC alone represents a cost-effective treatment for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This analysis can aid in future decisions on the allocation of healthcare resources.

摘要

引言

除了造成严重的发病率和死亡率外,冠状病毒病(COVID-19)还使全球医疗系统不堪重负。本研究调查了瑞德西韦联合标准治疗(SOC)方案对美国住院COVID-19患者的成本效益。

方法

本成本效益分析考虑了美国住院COVID-19患者中,瑞德西韦联合SOC方案与单纯SOC方案的直接和间接成本。患者根据基线序贯评分分层进入模型。在第15天,患者可转换至另一种健康状态,在第29天,假定患者已死亡或出院。然后对患者进行为期1年的随访,期间患者可能死亡或再次住院。

结果

与单纯SOC方案相比,瑞德西韦联合SOC方案每位患者总共避免了4个住院日:两个普通病房日,以及各1个重症监护病房日和重症监护病房加有创机械通气日。与单纯SOC方案相比,瑞德西韦联合SOC方案因住院费用降低和生产力损失成本降低而实现了净成本节约。在医院容量增加和减少的情况下,与单纯SOC方案相比,瑞德西韦联合SOC方案可提供更多床位和呼吸机。

结论

单独使用瑞德西韦联合SOC方案是治疗住院COVID-19患者的一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。该分析有助于未来医疗资源分配决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd8/10281925/aca4d78a28ab/40121_2023_816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd8/10281925/c4c3c8174528/40121_2023_816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd8/10281925/aca4d78a28ab/40121_2023_816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd8/10281925/c4c3c8174528/40121_2023_816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd8/10281925/aca4d78a28ab/40121_2023_816_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Remdesivir for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in the United States: Optimization of Health Care Resources.美国住院COVID-19患者使用瑞德西韦:医疗资源优化
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jun;12(6):1655-1665. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00816-y. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Clinical and economic benefits of lenzilumab plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States from the hospital perspective.从医院角度出发,比较 Lennzimab 联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗用于治疗美国 COVID-19 住院患者的临床和经济效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):160-171. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2030148.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib Compared With Standard of Care: A Modeling Study in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in the United States.巴瑞替尼与标准治疗相比的成本效益:美国 COVID-19 住院患者的建模研究。
Clin Ther. 2021 Nov;43(11):1877-1893.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Clinical and Economic Benefits of Lenzilumab Plus Standard of Care Compared with Standard of Care Alone for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) from the Perspective of National Health Service England.从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度看,与单独使用标准治疗方案相比,使用伦齐单抗加标准治疗方案治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者的临床和经济效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 14;14:231-247. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S360741. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Impact on Length of Hospital Stay of the Introduction of Remdesivir as a Treatment Option for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Supplemental Oxygen in Greece Versus Standard of Care.在希腊,针对需要补充氧气的新冠肺炎住院患者,与标准治疗相比,使用瑞德西韦作为治疗选择的成本效益分析及其对住院时间的影响。
Clin Ther. 2023 Dec;45(12):1244-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.023. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Remdesivir Treatment in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Low-Flow Oxygen Therapy: Payer Perspective in Turkey.瑞德西韦治疗需要低流量氧疗的 COVID-19 患者的成本效益分析:土耳其支付者视角。
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4935-4948. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01874-9. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Use of anti-viral therapies in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in the United Arab Emirates: a cost-effectiveness and health-care resource use analysis.在阿联酋住院的 COVID-19 患者中使用抗病毒疗法:成本效益和医疗资源使用分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09376-w.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Combination of Baricitinib and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in the United States: A Modelling Study.巴瑞替尼联合瑞德西韦治疗美国 COVID-19 住院患者的成本效益:一项建模研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):562-582. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01982-6. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
9
Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir plus usual care versus usual care alone for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: an economic evaluation as part of the Canadian Treatments for COVID-19 (CATCO) randomized clinical trial.瑞德西韦联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗对 COVID-19 住院患者的成本效益:作为加拿大 COVID-19 治疗(CATCO)随机临床试验的一部分的经济评价。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;10(3):E807-E817. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220077. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.
10
Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Cross-Study Comparison From 2 Large, Open-Label Studies.瑞德西韦治疗需要吸氧支持的 COVID-19:两项大型、开放标签研究的跨研究比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 22;79(5):1182-1189. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae336.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned from Model-based Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Drug Treatments Under Pandemic Circumstances: Results from a Systematic Review.基于模型的 COVID-19 药物治疗在大流行情况下的经济评估的经验教训:系统评价的结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):633-647. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01375-x. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Optimal resource allocation model for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 最优资源分配模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09007-7.
3
Remdesivir: A Review in COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review on COVID-19 Readmission and Risk Factors: Future of Machine Learning in COVID-19 Readmission Studies.对 COVID-19 再入院和危险因素的系统评价:机器学习在 COVID-19 再入院研究中的未来。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 23;10:898254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898254. eCollection 2022.
2
Deferral of non-emergency cardiac procedures is associated with increased early emergency cardiovascular hospitalizations.非紧急心脏手术的推迟与早期紧急心血管住院的增加有关。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Oct;111(10):1121-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02032-z. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity randomised trial and updated meta-analyses.
瑞德西韦:在 COVID-19 中的综述。
Drugs. 2023 Sep;83(13):1215-1237. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01926-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
瑞德西韦和其他三种药物治疗 COVID-19 住院患者:世卫组织团结随机试验的最终结果和更新的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1941-1953. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00519-0. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States With Surveillance Data Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model: Modeling Study.利用贝叶斯分层模型从监测数据估算美国的 COVID-19 住院人数:建模研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 2;8(6):e34296. doi: 10.2196/34296.
5
Update to living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19.世界卫生组织关于新冠肺炎药物的现行指南更新。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 21;377:o1005. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1005.
6
WHO Ordinal Scale and Inflammation Risk Categories in COVID-19. Comparative Study of the Severity Scales.世卫组织 COVID-19 等级量表和炎症风险类别。严重程度量表的比较研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1980-1987. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07511-7. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
The COVID-19 Pandemic Strikes Again and Again and Again.新冠疫情一次次袭来。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1760.
8
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in England and Wales.瑞德西韦治疗英国和威尔士住院 COVID-19 患者的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2022 May;25(5):761-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.015. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
9
COVID-19 infection and the broader impacts of the pandemic on healthcare workers.COVID-19 感染和大流行对医护人员的更广泛影响。
Respirology. 2022 Jun;27(6):411-426. doi: 10.1111/resp.14208. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
Remdesivir and dexamethasone as tools to relieve hospital care systems stressed by COVID-19: A modelling study on bed resources and budget impact.瑞德西韦和地塞米松缓解 COVID-19 导致的医院护理系统压力的工具:床位资源和预算影响的建模研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0262462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262462. eCollection 2022.