• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度看,与单独使用标准治疗方案相比,使用伦齐单抗加标准治疗方案治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者的临床和经济效益

Clinical and Economic Benefits of Lenzilumab Plus Standard of Care Compared with Standard of Care Alone for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) from the Perspective of National Health Service England.

作者信息

Kilcoyne Adrian, Jordan Edward, Thomas Kimberly, Pepper Alicia N, Zhou Allen, Chappell Dale, Amarapala Miyuru, Thériault Rachel-Karson, Thompson Melissa

机构信息

HEOR, Humanigen Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA.

Value & Evidence Services, EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 14;14:231-247. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S360741. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S360741
PMID:35444434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014956/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the clinical and economic benefits of lenzilumab plus standard of care (SOC) compared with SOC alone in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from the National Health Service (NHS) England perspective.

METHODS

A cost calculator was developed to estimate the clinical benefits and costs of adding lenzilumab to SOC in newly hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 28 days. The LIVE-AIR trial results informed the clinical inputs: failure to achieve survival without ventilation (SWOV), mortality, time to recovery, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) use. Base case costs included drug acquisition and administration for lenzilumab and remdesivir and hospital resource costs based on the level of care required. Clinical and economic benefits per weekly cohort of newly hospitalized patients were also estimated.

RESULTS

In all populations examined, specified clinical outcomes were improved with lenzilumab plus SOC over SOC treatment alone. In a base case population aged <85 years with C-reactive protein (CRP) <150 mg/L, with or without remdesivir, adding lenzilumab to SOC was estimated to result in per-patient cost savings of £1162. In a weekly cohort of 4754 newly hospitalized patients, addition of lenzilumab to SOC could result in 599 IMV uses avoided, 352 additional lives saved, and over £5.5 million in cost savings. Scenario results for per-patient cost savings included: 1) aged <85 years, CRP <150 mg/L, and receiving remdesivir (£3127); 2) Black patients with CRP <150 mg/L (£9977); and 3) Black patients from the full population (£2369). Conversely, in the full mITT population, results estimated additional cost of £4005 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Findings support clinical benefits for SWOV, mortality, time to recovery, time in ICU, time on IMV, and ventilator use, and an economic benefit from the NHS England perspective when adding lenzilumab to SOC for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

摘要

目的

从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度,评估与单独使用标准治疗(SOC)相比,在治疗住院的新冠肺炎患者时,联合使用lenzilumab与SOC的临床和经济效益。

方法

开发了一个成本计算器,以估计在28天内,将lenzilumab添加到新入院的新冠肺炎患者的SOC治疗中的临床益处和成本。LIVE-AIR试验结果为临床输入提供了依据:无创生存失败(SWOV)、死亡率、恢复时间、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率和有创机械通气(IMV)使用率。基础成本包括lenzilumab和瑞德西韦的药物采购及给药成本,以及基于所需护理水平的医院资源成本。还估计了每周新入院患者队列的临床和经济效益。

结果

在所有研究人群中,与单独使用SOC治疗相比,联合使用lenzilumab与SOC可改善特定的临床结局。在基础病例人群中,年龄<85岁、C反应蛋白(CRP)<150mg/L,无论是否使用瑞德西韦,将lenzilumab添加到SOC中估计可使每位患者节省成本1162英镑。在每周4754名新入院患者的队列中,将lenzilumab添加到SOC中可避免599次IMV使用,挽救352条生命,并节省超过550万英镑的成本。每位患者节省成本的情景分析结果包括:1)年龄<85岁、CRP<150mg/L且接受瑞德西韦治疗(3127英镑);2)CRP<150mg/L的黑人患者(9977英镑);3)全体人群中的黑人患者(2369英镑)。相反,在完整的意向性分析(mITT)人群中,结果估计每位患者额外成本为4005英镑。

结论

研究结果支持联合使用lenzilumab与SOC对SWOV、死亡率、恢复时间、ICU住院时间、IMV使用时间和呼吸机使用的临床益处,以及从NHS的角度来看,在住院的新冠肺炎患者中添加lenzilumab到SOC的经济效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0076/9014956/16a31eec1ece/CEOR-14-231-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0076/9014956/71cbc04b5ba1/CEOR-14-231-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0076/9014956/16a31eec1ece/CEOR-14-231-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0076/9014956/71cbc04b5ba1/CEOR-14-231-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0076/9014956/16a31eec1ece/CEOR-14-231-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and Economic Benefits of Lenzilumab Plus Standard of Care Compared with Standard of Care Alone for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) from the Perspective of National Health Service England.从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度看,与单独使用标准治疗方案相比,使用伦齐单抗加标准治疗方案治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者的临床和经济效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 14;14:231-247. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S360741. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical and economic benefits of lenzilumab plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States from the hospital perspective.从医院角度出发,比较 Lennzimab 联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗用于治疗美国 COVID-19 住院患者的临床和经济效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):160-171. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2030148.
3
LENZILUMAB EFFICACY AND SAFETY IN NEWLY HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 SUBJECTS: RESULTS FROM THE LIVE-AIR PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL.伦齐单抗在新冠病毒疾病新入院患者中的疗效与安全性:LIVE-AIR 3期随机双盲安慰剂对照试验结果
medRxiv. 2021 May 5:2021.05.01.21256470. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.01.21256470.
4
C reactive protein utilisation, a biomarker for early COVID-19 treatment, improves lenzilumab efficacy: results from the randomised phase 3 'LIVE-AIR' trial.C 反应蛋白的应用,一种 COVID-19 早期治疗的生物标志物,提高了 lenzilumab 的疗效:来自随机 3 期 'LIVE-AIR' 试验的结果。
Thorax. 2023 Jun;78(6):606-616. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2022-218744. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib Compared With Standard of Care: A Modeling Study in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in the United States.巴瑞替尼与标准治疗相比的成本效益:美国 COVID-19 住院患者的建模研究。
Clin Ther. 2021 Nov;43(11):1877-1893.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Lenzilumab in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (LIVE-AIR): a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.伦齐单抗治疗 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者(LIVE-AIR):一项 3 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):237-246. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00494-X. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
8
Remdesivir for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in the United States: Optimization of Health Care Resources.美国住院COVID-19患者使用瑞德西韦:医疗资源优化
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jun;12(6):1655-1665. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00816-y. Epub 2023 May 24.
9
Increased use of 6-monthly gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer: a capacity and cost-minimization analysis for England.前列腺癌使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂进行半年一次治疗的增加:英格兰的能力和成本最小化分析
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):208-218. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2172281.
10
Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir plus usual care versus usual care alone for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: an economic evaluation as part of the Canadian Treatments for COVID-19 (CATCO) randomized clinical trial.瑞德西韦联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗对 COVID-19 住院患者的成本效益:作为加拿大 COVID-19 治疗(CATCO)随机临床试验的一部分的经济评价。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;10(3):E807-E817. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220077. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned from Model-based Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Drug Treatments Under Pandemic Circumstances: Results from a Systematic Review.基于模型的 COVID-19 药物治疗在大流行情况下的经济评估的经验教训:系统评价的结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):633-647. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01375-x. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Diagnostics and treatments of COVID-19: two-year update to a living systematic review of economic evaluations.新型冠状病毒肺炎的诊断与治疗:对经济评估的实时系统评价的两年更新
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 16;14:1291164. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1291164. eCollection 2023.
3
Studying C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels in blood may prevent severe complications: A study in Bangladeshi COVID-19 patients.

本文引用的文献

1
C reactive protein utilisation, a biomarker for early COVID-19 treatment, improves lenzilumab efficacy: results from the randomised phase 3 'LIVE-AIR' trial.C 反应蛋白的应用,一种 COVID-19 早期治疗的生物标志物,提高了 lenzilumab 的疗效:来自随机 3 期 'LIVE-AIR' 试验的结果。
Thorax. 2023 Jun;78(6):606-616. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2022-218744. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Clinical and economic benefits of lenzilumab plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States from the hospital perspective.从医院角度出发,比较 Lennzimab 联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗用于治疗美国 COVID-19 住院患者的临床和经济效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):160-171. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2030148.
3
研究血液中的C反应蛋白和D-二聚体水平可能预防严重并发症:一项针对孟加拉国新冠肺炎患者的研究。
Front Genet. 2022 Dec 9;13:966595. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.966595. eCollection 2022.
OMICRON (B.1.1.529): A new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern mounting worldwide fear.奥密克戎(B.1.1.529):一种引起全球恐慌的新型关注变异株。
J Med Virol. 2022 May;94(5):1821-1824. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27541. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
Lenzilumab in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (LIVE-AIR): a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.伦齐单抗治疗 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者(LIVE-AIR):一项 3 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):237-246. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00494-X. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
How bad is Omicron? What scientists know so far.奥密克戎毒株有多严重?科学家目前所了解的情况。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7888):197-199. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-03614-z.
6
Pathogenic T-cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storms in severe COVID-19 patients.致病性T细胞和炎性单核细胞在重症COVID-19患者中引发炎症风暴。
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Jun;7(6):998-1002. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa041. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives.COVID-19 大流行对医疗保健设施和系统的经济影响:国际视角。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct;35(3):293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Lessons about COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among minority ethnic people in the UK.英国少数族裔人群对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的相关经验教训。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1204-1206. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00404-7. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Hospital length of stay for COVID-19 patients: Data-driven methods for forward planning.COVID-19患者的住院时间:用于前瞻性规划的数据驱动方法。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06371-6.
10
Inflammatory profiles across the spectrum of disease reveal a distinct role for GM-CSF in severe COVID-19.疾病谱中的炎症特征表明 GM-CSF 在重症 COVID-19 中具有显著作用。
Sci Immunol. 2021 Mar 10;6(57). doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abg9873.