Momsen Katharina, Ohndorf Markus
Department of Public Finance, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 15, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.
Alfred Weber Institute for Economics, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 58, Heidelberg 69115, Germany.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Jul;211:386-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.032. Epub 2023 May 18.
We report the results of an experiment on willful information avoidance regarding measures to address Covid-19. In the experiment, participants choose between two options, each associated with a contribution to the Corona Fund of the Red Cross USA and a payment to the participant. Depending on the treatment, either the participants' payoff, the donation, both or none of these pieces of information were hidden, but revealable. With this design, we can separate motivated reasons for ignorance from non-motivated reasons, both of which are present in our data. Furthermore, we find evidence of both self-serving and pro-social information avoidance. These behavioral patterns correlate with the subjects' political attitudes: while voters of the Democratic Party are prone to exhibit pro-social information avoidance, Republican voters rather engage in self-serving information avoidance.
我们报告了一项关于故意回避新冠疫情应对措施相关信息的实验结果。在该实验中,参与者在两个选项之间进行选择,每个选项都与一笔对美国红十字会新冠基金的捐款以及给参与者的一笔报酬相关。根据实验处理方式,参与者的报酬、捐款、两者或两者都不这些信息要么被隐藏,但可被揭示。通过这种设计,我们可以将出于动机的无知原因与非动机原因区分开来,这两种原因在我们的数据中都存在。此外,我们发现了利己和亲社会信息回避的证据。这些行为模式与受试者的政治态度相关:民主党选民倾向于表现出亲社会信息回避,而共和党选民则更倾向于进行利己信息回避。