• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家质量评估数据库。

National Databases for Assessment of Quality.

作者信息

Johnson Hillary R, Murtha Jacqueline A, Berian Julia R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):252-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761593. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1761593
PMID:37223233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10202538/
Abstract

With the rise in the availability of large health care datasets, database research has become an important tool for colorectal surgeon to assess health care quality and implement practice changes. In this chapter, we will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of database research for quality improvement, review common markers of quality for colorectal surgery, provide an overview of frequently used datasets (including Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program, National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, National Cancer Database, National Inpatient Sample, Medicare Data, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results), and look ahead to the future of database research for the improvement of quality.

摘要

随着大型医疗保健数据集可用性的提高,数据库研究已成为结直肠外科医生评估医疗保健质量和实施实践变革的重要工具。在本章中,我们将讨论数据库研究在质量改进方面的利弊,回顾结直肠手术质量的常见指标,概述常用数据集(包括退伍军人事务部外科质量改进计划、国家外科质量改进项目、国家癌症数据库、国家住院病人样本、医疗保险数据以及监测、流行病学和最终结果),并展望数据库研究在质量改进方面的未来。

相似文献

1
National Databases for Assessment of Quality.国家质量评估数据库。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):252-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761593. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: a comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures.国家数据库之间数据收集方法的差异会影响研究结果:腰椎融合手术的全国住院患者样本与国家手术质量改进计划数据库的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):e193. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01490.
4
A National Database Analysis Comparing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomies: Inherent Variance May Impact Outcomes.一项全国性数据库分析:比较全国住院患者样本与美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划中腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的情况——固有差异可能影响结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):843-54. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000642.
5
A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases.利用退伍军人事务部和胸外科医师协会的国家数据库在心脏外科质量改进方面十年的经验。
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):464-72; discussion 472-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00006.
6
Truth in Reporting: How Data Capture Methods Obfuscate Actual Surgical Site Infection Rates within a Health Care Network System.报告中的真相:数据采集方法如何掩盖医疗网络系统内实际的手术部位感染率
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):96-106. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000715.
7
National Databases for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research: Options, Strengths, and Limitations.国家神经外科研结局研究数据库:选择、优势与局限性。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):333-344. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx408.
8
The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部外科护理质量的比较评估与改进
Arch Surg. 2002 Jan;137(1):20-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.1.20.
9
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国退伍军人事务部的国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP):首个全国性、经过验证、基于结果、风险调整且由同行控制的用于衡量和提升外科护理质量的计划。国家退伍军人事务部外科质量改进计划。
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.
10
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and SEER-Medicare Databases: Use in Clinical Research for Improving Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库及SEER-医疗保险数据库:在临床研究中用于改善结直肠癌治疗结果
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):61-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673355. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Same Data, Opposite Results?: A Call to Improve Surgical Database Research.相同的数据,相反的结果?:呼吁改进外科手术数据库研究
JAMA Surg. 2021 Mar 1;156(3):219-220. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4991.
2
Better characterization of operation for ulcerative colitis through the National surgical quality improvement program: A 2-year audit of NSQIP-IBD.通过国家手术质量改进计划更好地描述溃疡性结肠炎的手术:NSQIP-IBD 的 2 年审核。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jan;221(1):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative: Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Disease-specific Module.ACS 国家外科质量改进计划-炎症性肠病合作组:一个特定疾病模块的设计、实施和验证。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Oct 18;25(11):1731-1739. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz044.
4
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and SEER-Medicare Databases: Use in Clinical Research for Improving Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库及SEER-医疗保险数据库:在临床研究中用于改善结直肠癌治疗结果
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):61-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673355. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery.利用国家外科质量改进项目(NSQIP)开展结直肠外科临床研究。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):41-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673353. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.减重手术的疗效和安全性比较:PCORnet 队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):741-750. doi: 10.7326/M17-2786. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
The Value of Clinical Colorectal Cancer Registries in Colorectal Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.临床结直肠癌登记在结直肠癌研究中的价值:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Sep 1;153(9):841-849. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1635.
8
What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.我们从NSQIP和NIS大型数据库中在微创结直肠手术方面学到了什么?一项系统综述。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;33(6):663-681. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3036-4. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.手术数据集实用指南:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 1;153(6):588-589. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0501.
10
Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).手术数据集实用指南:退伍军人事务部手术质量改进计划(VASQIP)
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):768-769. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0504.