Suppr超能文献

利用国家外科质量改进项目(NSQIP)开展结直肠外科临床研究。

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

作者信息

Eisenstein Samuel, Stringfield Sarah, Holubar Stefan D

机构信息

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.

Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):41-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673353. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Abstract

The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) is probably the most well-known surgical database in North American and worldwide. This clinical database was first proposed by Dr. Clifford Ko, a colorectal surgeon, to the ACS, and NSQIP first started collecting data ca. 2005 with the intent of comparing hospitals (benchmarking) and for hospital-level quality improvement projects. Since then, its popularity has grown from just a few participating hospitals in the United States to more than 708 participating hospitals worldwide, and collaboration allows regional or disease-specific data sharing. Importantly, from a methodological perspective, as the number of hospitals has grown so has the hospital heterogeneity and thus generalizability of the results and conclusions of the individual studies. In this article, we will first briefly present the structure of the database (aka the Participant User File) and other important methodological considerations specific to performing clinical research. We will then briefly review and summarize the approximately 60 published colectomy articles and 30 published articles on proctectomy. We will conclude with future directions relevant to colorectal clinical research.

摘要

美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进项目(ACS - NSQIP)可能是北美乃至全球最知名的外科手术数据库。这个临床数据库最初是由结直肠外科医生克利福德·柯博士向美国外科医师学会提出的,NSQIP大约在2005年开始收集数据,目的是比较医院(进行基准评估)以及开展医院层面的质量改进项目。从那时起,它的受欢迎程度从美国最初的几家参与医院发展到全球708多家参与医院,并且通过合作实现了区域或特定疾病的数据共享。重要的是,从方法学角度来看,随着医院数量的增加,医院的异质性也在增加,因此各个研究结果和结论的普遍性也受到影响。在本文中,我们将首先简要介绍数据库的结构(即参与者用户文件)以及进行临床研究时特有的其他重要方法学考量因素。然后,我们将简要回顾并总结大约60篇已发表的关于结肠切除术的文章以及30篇已发表的关于直肠切除术的文章。我们将以与结直肠临床研究相关的未来方向作为总结。

相似文献

1
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):41-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673353. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: achieving better and safer surgery.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 May;41(5):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41026-8.
3
Effects of Colorectal Surgery Classification on Reported Postoperative Surgical Site Infections.
J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Mar;19(3):361-371. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.PEDS16414. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
A comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):51-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2891.
10
Macro vs micro level surgical quality improvement: a regional collaborative demonstrates the case for a national NSQIP initiative.
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.017. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Race and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Feb;70(2):696-706. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08594-4. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Factors associated with 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;43(6):364-372. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.364. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
National Databases for Assessment of Quality.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):252-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761593. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Metabolic Syndrome: Is Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Safe in This Patient Population?
Cureus. 2023 May 21;15(5):e39299. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39299. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Predicting Need for Skilled Nursing or Rehabilitation Facility after Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Hip Pelvis. 2022 Dec;34(4):227-235. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.4.227. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
6
What is the real morbidity after emergency colectomy for Crohn's disease? A propensity score matched study.
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02727-5. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
Unplanned intubation after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: Assessing preoperative risk factors.
J Orthop. 2022 Feb 3;29:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.01.011. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
8
Trends in extent of surgical cytoreduction for patients with ovarian cancer.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260255. eCollection 2021.
10

本文引用的文献

2
African Americans and Short-Term Outcomes after Surgery for Crohn's Disease: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Apr 1;11(4):468-473. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw175.
3
Development of a Nonparametric Predictive Model for Readmission Risk in Elderly Adults After Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):e125-e130. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14448. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
The impact of bowel preparation on the severity of anastomotic leak in colon cancer patients.
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;114(7):810-813. doi: 10.1002/jso.24426. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
5
Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is associated with worse outcomes in colon cancer patients.
Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1333-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open colectomy for colon cancer.
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Rates, trends, and short-term outcomes of colorectal resections for endometriosis: An ACS-NSQIP review.
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.039. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
National Trends in Short-term Outcomes Following Non-emergent Surgery for Diverticular Disease.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jul;20(7):1376-87. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3150-y. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy: A Risk Factor for Short-Term Wound Complications after Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer?
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
10
Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.041. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验