Oberklaid F, Prior M, Sanson A
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986 Jun;7(3):159-62.
The temperament of a group of preterm infants (n = 126) was studied as part of a large, longitudinal study of infant temperament and behavior in a representative sample of Australian infants (n = 2443). Utilizing the Infant Temperament Questionnaire of Carey and McDevitt, previously revised and validated for an Australian population, ratings were made at 4 to 8 months corrected age, and data for the preterm group (less than 37 weeks gestation) were compared to those infants born at term (37 to 41 weeks). There were no significant differences between the two groups on any of the sociodemographic variables, on the mother's global rating of temperament, or on the reported incidence of colic, sleep problems, and excessive crying. There were also no differences between premature and full-term infants on any of the individual dimensions or clinical categories of temperament. We conclude that prematurity per se does not affect observed temperament at 4 to 8 months. However, we cannot extend these conclusions to high-risk infants who experience medical complications of prematurity, and who require intensive care for prolonged periods of time. These may represent an entirely different category of risk for subsequent difficult temperament and behavior problems.
作为一项针对澳大利亚婴儿(n = 2443)的婴儿气质和行为的大型纵向研究的一部分,对一组早产儿(n = 126)的气质进行了研究。使用先前针对澳大利亚人群进行修订和验证的凯里和麦克德维特婴儿气质问卷,在矫正年龄4至8个月时进行评分,并将早产组(孕周小于37周)的数据与足月儿(37至41周)的数据进行比较。两组在任何社会人口统计学变量、母亲对气质的总体评分或报告的腹绞痛、睡眠问题和过度哭闹发生率方面均无显著差异。早产儿和足月儿在气质的任何个体维度或临床类别上也没有差异。我们得出结论,早产本身不会影响4至8个月时观察到的气质。然而,我们不能将这些结论推广到经历早产医学并发症且需要长时间重症监护的高危婴儿。这些婴儿可能代表了随后出现难养气质和行为问题的完全不同的风险类别。