Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology (EAWAG), Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Sep 15;342:118069. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118069. Epub 2023 May 22.
Primary considerations for urban blue-green infrastructure (BGI) encompass sustainable stormwater/urban heat management while biodiversity conservation is often considered an inherent benefit rather than a core planning requirement. However, ecological function of BGI as 'stepping stones' or linear corridors for otherwise fragmented habitats is undisputed. While quantitative approaches for modelling ecological connectivity in conservation planning are well established, mismatches in scope and scale with models that support the planning of BGI makes their adoption and integration difficult across disciplines. Technical complexities have led to ambiguity around circuit and network-based approaches, focal node placement, spatial extents, and resolution. Furthermore, these approaches are often computationally intensive, and considerable gaps remain in their use for identifying local-scale critical "pinch-points" that urban planners may respond to with the integration of BGI interventions that address biodiversity enhancement among other ecosystem services. Here, we present a framework that simplifies and integrates the merits of regional connectivity assessments with a focus on urban areas to prioritise BGI planning interventions while reducing computational demands. Our framework facilitates: (1) modelling potential ecological corridors at a coarse regional scale, (2) prioritising local-scale BGI interventions based on the relative contribution of individual nodes in this regional network, and (3) inferring connectivity hot- and cold-spots for local-scale BGI interventions. We illustrate this in the Swiss lowlands, demonstrating how, compared to previous work, we are able to identify and rank different priority locations across the region for BGI interventions in support of biodiversity enhancement and how their local-scale functional design may be benefited by addressing specific environmental variables.
城市蓝绿基础设施 (BGI) 的首要考虑因素包括可持续的雨水/城市热管理,而生物多样性保护通常被认为是固有效益,而不是核心规划要求。然而,BGI 作为“踏脚石”或线性走廊的生态功能,将原本分散的栖息地连接起来,这一点是无可争议的。虽然用于保护规划中生态连通性建模的定量方法已经成熟,但与支持 BGI 规划的模型在范围和尺度上的不匹配,使得它们在跨学科领域的采用和整合变得困难。技术复杂性导致基于回路和网络的方法、焦点节点放置、空间范围和分辨率存在歧义。此外,这些方法通常计算量很大,在识别可能需要城市规划者通过整合 BGI 干预措施来应对的局部关键“瓶颈”方面,仍存在相当大的差距,这些干预措施可以增强生物多样性和其他生态系统服务。在这里,我们提出了一个框架,简化和整合了区域连通性评估的优点,重点是城市地区,以优先考虑 BGI 规划干预措施,同时降低计算需求。我们的框架具有以下功能:(1) 在粗略的区域尺度上模拟潜在的生态走廊;(2) 根据区域网络中各个节点的相对贡献,优先考虑局部尺度的 BGI 干预措施;(3) 推断局部尺度 BGI 干预措施的连通热点和冷点。我们在瑞士低地进行了演示,与以前的工作相比,我们能够确定和排列该地区不同的优先位置,以支持生物多样性增强的 BGI 干预措施,以及如何通过解决特定环境变量来受益于其局部尺度的功能设计。