• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下手动负压吸引术终止早期妊娠的 5 年回顾性分析。

Five-year retrospective review of ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester miscarriage.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2023 Jun;29(3):233-239. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2210127. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.12809/hkmj2210127
PMID:37226490
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Manual vacuum aspiration is increasingly accepted as an alternative to medical or surgical evacuation of the uterus after first-trimester miscarriage. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) in the management of first-trimester miscarriage.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included adult women with first-trimester miscarriage who underwent USG-MVA in Hong Kong between July 2015 and February 2021. The primary outcome was the efficacy of USG-MVA in terms of complete evacuation of the uterus, without the need for further medical or surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included tolerance of the entire procedure, the success rate of karyotyping using chorionic villi, and procedural safety (ie, any clinically significant complications).

RESULTS

In total, 331 patients were scheduled to undergo USG-MVA for first-trimester miscarriage or incomplete miscarriage. The procedure was completed in 314 patients and well-tolerated in all of those patients. The complete evacuation rate was 94.6% (297/314), which is similar to the rate (98.1%) achieved by conventional surgical evacuation in a previous randomised controlled trial in our unit. There were no major complications. Samples from 95.2% of patients were suitable for karyotyping, which is considerably higher than the rate of suitable samples (82.9%) obtained via conventional surgical evacuation in our previous randomised controlled trial.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration is a safe and effective method to manage first-trimester miscarriage. Although it currently is not extensively used in Hong Kong, its broader clinical application could avoid general anaesthesia and shorten hospital stay.

摘要

简介

手动吸引术越来越被认为是早孕流产后子宫清除的一种替代方法,可替代药物或手术清宫。本研究旨在评估超声引导下手动吸引术(USG-MVA)在早孕流产管理中的疗效。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入 2015 年 7 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在香港因早孕流产而接受 USG-MVA 的成年女性。主要结局是 USG-MVA 完全清除子宫的疗效,无需进一步药物或手术干预。次要结局包括整个手术过程的耐受性、绒毛组织进行核型分析的成功率以及手术安全性(即任何有临床意义的并发症)。

结果

共有 331 例患者因早孕流产或不全流产而计划接受 USG-MVA。314 例患者完成了手术,所有患者均能耐受。完全清除率为 94.6%(297/314),与我们单位之前的一项随机对照试验中常规手术清宫的清除率(98.1%)相似。无重大并发症。95.2%的患者样本适合核型分析,明显高于我们之前的随机对照试验中常规手术清宫的合适样本率(82.9%)。

结论

超声引导下手动吸引术是一种安全有效的管理早孕流产的方法。尽管它目前在香港尚未广泛应用,但它的广泛临床应用可以避免全身麻醉并缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
Five-year retrospective review of ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester miscarriage.超声引导下手动负压吸引术终止早期妊娠的 5 年回顾性分析。
Hong Kong Med J. 2023 Jun;29(3):233-239. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2210127. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.超声引导下手动吸引与电动吸引治疗宫腔粘连的随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06328-y.
3
Efficacy, feasibility and patient acceptability of ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration for treating early pregnancy loss.超声引导下手动真空抽吸治疗早期妊娠流产的疗效、可行性及患者可接受性。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;59(1):71-76. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12811. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Incidence of intrauterine adhesion after ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) for first-trimester miscarriages: a prospective cohort study.超声引导下手动负压吸引术(USG-MVA)治疗早期流产后宫腔粘连的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07280-6. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial.手动吸引与传统扩宫刮宫术和电动吸引在流产手术治疗中的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4.
6
Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe alternative for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss.人工负压吸引术:早期流产手术管理的一种安全替代方法。
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1268-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02223.x. Epub 2009 May 14.
7
Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Expectant Management for First Trimester Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial.孕早期流产的人工负压吸引术与期待疗法:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):e45731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45731. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for treatment of first-trimester incomplete miscarriage in a low-resource setting: A randomized controlled trial.米索前列醇与手动真空吸引术治疗资源匮乏地区早期不全流产的随机对照试验
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 May;23(5):638-646. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_379_19.
9
Ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) with cervical preparation for early pregnancy loss: A cost-effectiveness analysis.超声引导下手动负压吸引术(USG-MVA)联合宫颈准备治疗早期妊娠丢失:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0294058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294058. eCollection 2023.
10
Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe and cost-effective substitute of electric vacuum aspiration for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss.人工负压吸引术:一种安全且经济高效的替代电动负压吸引术用于早期流产手术管理的方法。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Feb;61(2):149-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrauterine Adhesion-Induced Septated Amniotic Cavity: Ultrasonographic Findings in Second and Third Trimesters.宫腔粘连所致分隔羊膜腔:孕中晚期超声表现
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;14(24):2826. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242826.
2
Giant uterine tumor and miscarriage: how to proceed?巨大子宫肿瘤与流产:如何处理?
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2024 May 3;57:e13549. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2024e13549. eCollection 2024.