• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009 年至 2022 年期间日本生物类似药监管审批和 PMDA 评估的历史概述。

Historical Overview of Regulatory Approvals and PMDA Assessments for Biosimilar Products in Japan During 2009-2022.

机构信息

Office of Cellular and Tissue-Based Products Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-3-2, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2023 Jul;37(4):443-451. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00605-6. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s40259-023-00605-6
PMID:37227657
Abstract

A biosimilar product is defined as "a biological product that is highly similar to an existing, approved biological product (known as originator or reference product) in terms of structure, function, quality, and clinical efficacy and safety". Recently, biosimilar products have been actively developed around the world, and part of the reason for this is to combat the rapid growth of medical expenses in many countries, including Japan, the United States (US), and Europe. The use of biosimilar products has been promoted as a measure to address this issue. The review of marketing authorization applications for biosimilar products in Japan is conducted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), which reviews the comparability of the quality, efficacy, and safety based on the data submitted by the applicants. As of December 2022, 32 biosimilar products have been approved in Japan. Through this process, the PMDA has gained much experience and knowledge regarding the development and regulatory approval of biosimilar products; however, details of the regulatory approvals for biosimilar products in Japan have not been reported until now. Therefore, in this article, we present the details of regulatory history and revised guidelines for approval of biosimilar products in Japan, questions and answers, other relevant notifications, and consideration for comparability evaluations for analytical, non-clinical, and clinical studies. In addition, we provide details about the approval history, number, and types of biosimilar products that have been approved between 2009 and 2022 in Japan.

摘要

生物类似药是指“在结构、功能、质量、临床疗效和安全性方面与已批准的现有生物制品(称为原研药或参照药)高度相似的生物制品”。最近,全球范围内积极开发生物类似药,部分原因是为了应对包括日本、美国和欧洲在内的许多国家医疗费用的快速增长。使用生物类似药被视为解决这一问题的一项措施。日本药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)对生物类似药的营销授权申请进行审查,根据申请人提交的数据,审查其质量、疗效和安全性的可比性。截至 2022 年 12 月,日本已批准 32 种生物类似药。通过这一过程,PMDA 在生物类似药的开发和监管审批方面积累了丰富的经验和知识;然而,直到现在,日本生物类似药监管审批的详细信息尚未报道。因此,本文介绍了日本生物类似药监管审批的历史和修订指南、问答、其他相关通知,以及对分析、非临床和临床研究可比性评估的考虑。此外,还详细介绍了日本在 2009 年至 2022 年期间批准的生物类似药的批准历史、数量和类型。

相似文献

1
Historical Overview of Regulatory Approvals and PMDA Assessments for Biosimilar Products in Japan During 2009-2022.2009 年至 2022 年期间日本生物类似药监管审批和 PMDA 评估的历史概述。
BioDrugs. 2023 Jul;37(4):443-451. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00605-6. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated Policy Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.改善欧盟、美国和日本的肿瘤生物类似药上市情况:不良反应南方网络的最新政策回顾。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):e575-e588. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30485-X.
3
Japanese regulation of biosimilar products: past experience and current challenges.日本生物类似药产品监管:过往经验与当前挑战
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):30-40. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12931. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Survey of Data Package and Sample Size of Comparative Clinical Studies for Biosimilar Developments from PMDA Assessments.从 PMDA 评估看生物类似药开发的对照临床研究数据包和样本量调查。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):225-239. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00525-y. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Biosimilars: impact of biologic product life cycle and European experience on the regulatory trajectory in the United States.生物类似药:生物制品生命周期和欧洲经验对美国监管轨迹的影响。
Clin Ther. 2012 Feb;34(2):400-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
[Biosimilars].[生物类似药]
Ther Umsch. 2011 Nov;68(11):659-66. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000227.
7
Current Japanese Regulatory Systems for Generics and Biosimilars.日本现行的仿制药和生物类似药监管体系。
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Mar;107(3):785-787. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
8
State-of-the-art biosimilar erythropoietins in the management of renal anemia: lessons learned from Europe and implications for US nephrologists.治疗肾性贫血的前沿生物类似物促红细胞生成素:欧洲经验及对美国肾病学家的启示
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Sep;47(9):1529-39. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1042-9. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Considerations of critical quality attributes in the analytical comparability assessment of biosimilar products.生物类似药分析可比性评估中的关键质量属性考量
Biologicals. 2017 Jul;48:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Understanding the biosimilar approval and extrapolation process-A case study of an epoetin biosimilar.理解生物类似药的批准和外推过程——以一种促红细胞生成素生物类似药为例。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Aug;104:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Efforts of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japanese regulatory agency in supporting biosimilar development and disseminate information.日本监管机构药品和医疗器械局在支持生物类似药研发及传播信息方面所做的努力。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-03874-w.
2
Trend Analysis of Regulatory Approvals for Generics and Biosimilars in Japan: 15 Years of PMDA During Fiscal Years 2009-2023.日本药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)在 2009-2023 财年期间的仿制药和生物类似药监管审批趋势分析:15 年
AAPS J. 2024 Nov 12;26(6):113. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00989-5.
3
Evaluating biosimilars: safety, efficacy, and regulatory considerations in clinical studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Considerations on Clinical Efficacy Studies of Biosimilar for PMDA Submission.生物类似药 PMDA 申报临床疗效研究的统计学考虑
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1134-1137. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00133-3. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Biosimilarity assessment of biosimilar therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.生物类似治疗性单克隆抗体的生物相似性评估
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Feb;34(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Current Japanese Regulatory Systems for Generics and Biosimilars.日本现行的仿制药和生物类似药监管体系。
评估生物类似药:临床研究中的安全性、有效性及监管考量
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):232-236. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01825-8. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
4
Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments.人工智能时代的生物类似药——国际法规及在肿瘤治疗中的应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;17(7):925. doi: 10.3390/ph17070925.
5
A descriptive analysis of real-world oncology biosimilar use in Japan.日本真实世界肿瘤生物类似药使用情况的描述性分析。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(25):1837-1850. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2352405. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Survey of Data Package and Sample Size of Comparative Clinical Studies for Biosimilar Developments from PMDA Assessments.从 PMDA 评估看生物类似药开发的对照临床研究数据包和样本量调查。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):225-239. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00525-y. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Mar;107(3):785-787. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
4
The Language of Biosimilars: Clarification, Definitions, and Regulatory Aspects.生物类似药的语言:阐释、定义及监管方面
Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(6):671-677. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0717-1.
5
Biosimilarity Versus Manufacturing Change: Two Distinct Concepts.生物相似性与生产变更:两个不同的概念。
Pharm Res. 2016 Feb;33(2):261-8. doi: 10.1007/s11095-015-1790-3. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
6
Clinical considerations for the development of biosimilars in oncology.肿瘤学中生物类似药研发的临床考量
MAbs. 2015;7(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1008346.
7
Experience of reviewing the follow-on biologics including Somatropin and erythropoietin in Japan.在日本审评包括生长激素和促红细胞生成素在内的生物类似药的经验。
Biologicals. 2011 Sep;39(5):289-92. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
8
Quality, safety and efficacy of follow-on biologics in Japan.日本生物类似药的质量、安全性和有效性。
Biologicals. 2011 Sep;39(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.06.015. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
9
Development and characterization of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP).新型促红细胞生成素(NESP)的研发与特性研究
Br J Cancer. 2001 Apr;84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-10. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1746.