• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生与护士:理解医护人员中疫苗犹豫的巨大差异

Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers.

作者信息

Ahamed Sajid Hussain Rafi, Shakil Shahid, Lyu Hanjia, Zhang Xinping, Luo Jiebo

机构信息

University of Rochester.

University of Rochester Medical Center.

出版信息

Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data. 2022 Dec;2022:5865-5870. doi: 10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020853.

DOI:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020853
PMID:37228710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10208360/
Abstract

Healthcare workers such as doctors and nurses are expected to be trustworthy and creditable sources of vaccine-related information. Their opinions toward the COVID-19 vaccines may influence the vaccine uptake among the general population. However, vaccine hesitancy is still an important issue even among the healthcare workers. Therefore, it is critical to understand their opinions to help reduce the level of vaccine hesitancy. There have been studies examining healthcare workers' viewpoints on COVID-19 vaccines using questionnaires. Reportedly, a considerably higher proportion of vaccine hesitancy is observed among nurses, compared to doctors. We intend to verify and study this phenomenon at a much larger scale and in fine grain using social media data, which has been effectively and efficiently leveraged by researchers to address real-world issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, we use a keyword search to identify healthcare workers and further classify them into doctors and nurses from the profile descriptions of the corresponding Twitter users. Moreover, we apply a transformer-based language model to remove irrelevant tweets. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling are employed to analyze and compare the sentiment and thematic differences in the tweets posted by doctors and nurses. We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. The focuses of doctors and nurses when they discuss vaccines in a negative way are in general . Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants while nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children. Therefore, we suggest that more customized strategies should be deployed when communicating with different groups of healthcare workers.

摘要

医生和护士等医护人员被期望成为与疫苗相关信息的可靠来源。他们对新冠疫苗的看法可能会影响普通人群的疫苗接种率。然而,即使在医护人员中,疫苗犹豫仍然是一个重要问题。因此,了解他们的看法对于帮助降低疫苗犹豫程度至关重要。已经有研究通过问卷调查来考察医护人员对新冠疫苗的观点。据报道,与医生相比,护士中观察到的疫苗犹豫比例要高得多。我们打算利用社交媒体数据在更大规模和更精细的层面上验证和研究这一现象,在新冠疫情期间,研究人员已经有效地利用社交媒体数据来解决现实世界的问题。更具体地说,我们使用关键词搜索来识别医护人员,并根据相应推特用户的个人资料描述将他们进一步分为医生和护士。此外,我们应用基于Transformer的语言模型来去除不相关的推文。采用情感分析和主题建模来分析和比较医生和护士发布的推文中的情感和主题差异。我们发现医生总体上对新冠疫苗更为积极。医生和护士以负面方式讨论疫苗时的关注点通常有所不同。医生更关注疫苗对新变种的有效性,而护士则更关注对儿童的潜在副作用。因此,我们建议在与不同群体的医护人员沟通时应部署更具针对性的策略。

相似文献

1
Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers.医生与护士:理解医护人员中疫苗犹豫的巨大差异
Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data. 2022 Dec;2022:5865-5870. doi: 10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020853.
2
Characterizing discourses about COVID-19 vaccines on Twitter: a topic modeling and sentiment analysis approach.在推特上描述关于新冠疫苗的话语:一种主题建模和情感分析方法。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Mar;16(1):103-112. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2022.2054196. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Acceptance, and Promotion Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.COVID-19 疫苗犹豫、接受和医护人员的推广:一项混合方法分析。
J Community Health. 2022 Oct;47(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01095-3. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
5
Dynamics of the Negative Discourse Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: Topic Modeling Study and an Annotated Data Set of Twitter Posts.针对 COVID-19 疫苗的负面话语动态:主题建模研究与 Twitter 帖子的标注数据集。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 12;25:e41319. doi: 10.2196/41319.
6
Examining Public Sentiments and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Infoveillance Study Using Twitter Posts.审视公众对新冠疫苗接种的情绪和态度:利用推特帖子的信息监测研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Apr 15;2(1):e33909. doi: 10.2196/33909. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.疫苗接种后关于 COVID-19 疫苗的推文:基于情感的主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e31726. doi: 10.2196/31726.
8
Vaccine discourse during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: Topical structure and source patterns informing efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy.COVID-19 大流行期间的疫苗话语:提供信息以对抗疫苗犹豫的主题结构和来源模式。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271394. eCollection 2022.
9
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
10
Twitter sentiment analysis from Iran about COVID 19 vaccine.推特上关于新冠疫苗的伊朗民众情绪分析。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Jan;16(1):102367. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102367. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental doubts regarding childhood vaccinations after the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study from Poland.新冠疫情后父母对儿童疫苗接种的疑虑:来自波兰的一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1606815. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1606815. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring healthcare workers' immunisation behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines through psychological patterns.通过心理模式探索医护人员对新冠疫苗的接种行为
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4710.
3
Perceived experts are prevalent and influential within an antivaccine community on Twitter.

本文引用的文献

1
Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake.错误信息与事实:了解有关新冠疫苗的新闻对疫苗接种率的影响。
Health Data Sci. 2022 Mar 12;2022:9858292. doi: 10.34133/2022/9858292. eCollection 2022.
2
Characterizing Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccines: A Reddit Version of the Pandemic Story.新冠疫苗相关话语的特征分析:Reddit 版的大流行故事
Health Data Sci. 2021 Aug 27;2021:9837856. doi: 10.34133/2021/9837856. eCollection 2021.
3
A Mixed-methods Study of Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability among Health Workers in Northern Nigeria.
在推特上的反疫苗群体中,所谓的专家很常见且颇具影响力。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 7;3(2):pgae007. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae007. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Vaccination willingness, vaccine hesitancy, and estimated coverage of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among healthcare workers in Tanzania: A call for action.坦桑尼亚医护人员对 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的接种意愿、疫苗犹豫情绪和预估接种率:呼吁采取行动。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Dec;11(12):e1126. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1126.
5
Influenza immunization of healthcare personnel in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era: Still a lot to do!新冠疫情后时代医护人员的流感疫苗接种:仍有许多工作要做!
Vaccine X. 2023 Nov 2;15:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100402. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
The role and influence of perceived experts in an anti-vaccine misinformation community.在一个反疫苗错误信息群体中,被视为专家者的角色与影响。
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 29:2023.07.12.23292568. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.12.23292568.
尼日利亚北部医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗接受度的相关因素混合方法研究。
Pathog Glob Health. 2022 Jun;116(4):254-262. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.2011674. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Healthcare Personnel: A University Hospital Experience.医护人员对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一所大学医院的经历
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;9(11):1343. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111343.
5
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers and its socio-demographic determinants in Abia State, Southeastern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚东南部阿比亚州医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫及其社会人口学决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Sep 3;40:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.10.29816. eCollection 2021.
6
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses in two academic hospitals in Philadelphia.新冠病毒疾病 2019(COVID-19)疫苗犹豫在费城两家学术医院的医生、医师助理、执业护士和护士中。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;43(10):1424-1432. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.410. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
Perception, Preventive Practice, and Attitude Towards Vaccine Against COVID-19 Among Health Care Professionals in Bangladesh.孟加拉国医护人员对新冠疫苗的认知、预防措施及态度
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 31;14:3531-3540. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S326531. eCollection 2021.
8
Monitoring Depression Trends on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.新冠疫情期间推特上抑郁症趋势的监测:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Jul 18;1(1):e26769. doi: 10.2196/26769. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination.关于潜在新冠疫苗公众意见的社交媒体研究:揭示异议、差异及传播情况
Intell Med. 2022 Feb;2(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake among Nursing Staff during an Active Vaccine Rollout.新冠疫苗积极推广期间护理人员对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度及接种情况
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 4;9(8):858. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080858.