Li Ru, Wang Tingyu, Lyv Rui, Wang Yi, Yu Ying, Yan Yuting, Sun Qi, Xiong Wenjie, Liu Wei, Sui Weiwei, Huang Wenyang, Wang Huijun, Li Chengwen, Wang Jun, Zou Dehui, An Gang, Wang Jianxiang, Qiu Lugui, Yi Shuhua
State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China.
Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China.
Blood Sci. 2022 Dec 9;5(2):118-124. doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000144. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Rituximab maintenance (RM) prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) of responding patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the maintenance efficacy in different Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group is still confusing. We performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of RM treatments in patients with FL responding to induction therapy based on their FLIPI risk assessment carried out prior to treatment. We identified 93 patients between 2013 and 2019 who received RM every 3 months for ≥4 doses (RM group), and 60 patients who did not accept RM or received rituximab less than 4 doses (control group). After a median follow-up of 39 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS was reached for the entire population. The PFS was significantly prolonged in the RM group compared to the control group (median PFS NA vs 83.1 months, = .00027). When the population was divided into the 3 FLIPI risk groups, the PFS differed significantly (4-year PFS rates, 97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, = .01) according to group. There was no significant difference in PFS for FLIPI low-risk patients with RM compared to the control group (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 93.8%, = .23). However, the PFS of the RM group was significantly prolonged for FLIPI intermediate-risk (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 70.3%, = .00077) and high-risk patients (4-year PFS rates, 86.7% vs 57.1%, = .023). These data suggest that standard RM significantly prolongs the PFS of patients assigned to intermediate- and high-risk FLIPI groups but not to low-risk FLIPI group, and pending larger-scale studies to validate.
利妥昔单抗维持治疗(RM)可延长滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)缓解患者的无进展生存期(PFS),但在不同的滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数(FLIPI)风险组中的维持疗效仍不明确。我们基于治疗前进行的FLIPI风险评估,对接受诱导治疗后有反应的FL患者进行RM治疗的效果进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了2013年至2019年间93例每3个月接受≥4剂RM治疗的患者(RM组),以及60例未接受RM或接受利妥昔单抗少于4剂的患者(对照组)。中位随访39个月后,整个人群的中位总生存期(OS)和PFS均未达到。与对照组相比,RM组的PFS显著延长(中位PFS未达到 vs 83.1个月,P = 0.00027)。当将人群分为3个FLIPI风险组时,PFS根据分组有显著差异(4年PFS率,97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%,P = 0.01)。与对照组相比,接受RM治疗的FLIPI低风险患者的PFS无显著差异(4年PFS率,100% vs 93.8%,P = 0.23)。然而,RM组的PFS在FLIPI中风险(4年PFS率,100% vs 70.3%,P = 0.00077)和高风险患者(4年PFS率,86.7% vs 57.1%,P = 0.023)中显著延长。这些数据表明,标准RM显著延长了分配到FLIPI中风险和高风险组患者的PFS,但未延长FLIPI低风险组患者的PFS,有待更大规模的研究进行验证。