• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于信任与新冠疫情的思考:政治、医学与环境是否相互需要?

Reflections on trust and COVID-19: do politics, medicine and the environment need each other?

作者信息

Cole Alistair, Dutheil Frederic, Baker Julien S

机构信息

Department of Government and International Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.

Preventive and Occupational Medicine, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

UCL Open Environ. 2020 Aug 27;2:e010. doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000010. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000010
PMID:37229293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10208311/
Abstract

This short article is centred on how trust can be a valuable resource for developing cognate responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the medical and social sciences. Politics and medicine can learn from each other. Governments need to persuade individuals to adapt their behaviours, and such persuasion will be all the more convincing in that it is nested in social networks. Trust in government requires consistent (benevolent, performative and joined-up) explanations. The distinction between hard medical and soft social science blurs when patients/citizens are required to be active participants in combatting a pandemic virus.

摘要

这篇短文聚焦于信任如何成为医学和社会科学领域针对新冠疫情制定相关应对措施的宝贵资源。政治学和医学可以相互借鉴。政府需要说服个人改变行为,而这种说服若能融入社交网络,将会更具说服力。对政府的信任需要始终如一(善意、有效且协调一致)的解释。当要求患者/公民积极参与抗击大流行病毒时,硬医学与软社会科学之间的区别就变得模糊了。

相似文献

1
Reflections on trust and COVID-19: do politics, medicine and the environment need each other?关于信任与新冠疫情的思考:政治、医学与环境是否相互需要?
UCL Open Environ. 2020 Aug 27;2:e010. doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000010. eCollection 2020.
2
Citizens' Willingness to Support New Taxes for COVID-19 Measures and the Role of Trust.公民支持为新冠疫情措施开征新税的意愿及信任的作用。
Polit Policy. 2021 Jun;49(3):534-565. doi: 10.1111/polp.12404. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.新冠疫情下的比较政治学:理解政府应对措施的必要性。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Health and politics in pandemic times: COVID-19 responses in Ethiopia.大流行时期的健康与政治:埃塞俄比亚的 COVID-19 应对措施。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1681-1689. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab091.
5
Political distrust and the spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria.政治不信任与尼日利亚 COVID-19 的传播。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Dec;15(12):1753-1766. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1828987. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Trust in the U.S. Government and Its Health Agencies in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间对美国政府及其卫生机构的信任
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;3(2):148-160. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia3020012.
8
Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem.科学、政治与监管:基于信任的划界问题解决途径
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2021 Dec;90:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
10
Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis.荷兰的新冠疫情封锁措施增强了对政府的信任和对科学的信任:一项双重差分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113819. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间美国家庭暴力的惊人趋势。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2753-2755. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.077. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
2
COVID-19: where is the national ethical guidance?新冠疫情:国家伦理指南在哪里?
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 1;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00478-2.
3
Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment.COVID-19 对环境的间接影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138813. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
A Model of Interpersonal Trust, Credibility, and Relationship Maintenance.人际信任、可信度与关系维持模型
Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1319. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands.监测荷兰公众对政府信任度、风险认知度以及在甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间采取防护措施的意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 19;11:575. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-575.
6
Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review.大流行期间保护行为的人口统计学和态度决定因素:综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824. doi: 10.1348/135910710X485826. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
7
The mad cow problem in the UK: risk perceptions, risk management, and health policy development.
J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(2):160-83.