• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何衡量强化精神病家庭治疗中的工作人员连续性:常规数据与单病例分析

How to measure staff continuity in intensive psychiatric home treatment: a routine data and single case analysis.

作者信息

Schwarz Julian, Wolff Jan, Heinze Martin, von Peter Sebastian, Habicht Juri Luis

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Center for Health Service Research Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1166197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1166197. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1166197
PMID:37229387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10204706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive forms of outreach mental health care (IOC) such as crisis resolution or home treatment teams are increasingly implemented as alternatives to inpatient admission, providing recovery-oriented treatment at home at comparable costs and outcomes. However, one issue with IOC is the lack of continuity regarding staff members who provide home visits, complicating relationship building and meaningful therapeutic exchange. The aim of this study is to validate existing primarily qualitative findings using performance data and to explore a possible correlation between the number of staff involved within IOC treatment and the service users' length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

Routine data from an IOC team in a catchment area in Eastern Germany were analyzed. Basic parameters of service delivery were calculated and an in-depth descriptive analysis regarding staff continuity was performed. Further, an exploratory single case analysis was conducted, presenting the exact sequence of all treatment contacts for one case with low and one with high staff continuity.

RESULTS

We analyzed 10.598 face-to-face treatment contacts based on 178 IOC users. The mean LOS was 30.99 days. About 75% of all home visits were conducted by two or more staff members simultaneously. Service users saw an average of 10.24 different staff per treatment episode. On 11% of the care days, only unknown staff, and on 34% of the care days at least one unknown staff member conducted the home visit. 83% of the contacts were performed by the same three staff members and 51% were made by one and the same staff member. A significant positive correlation ( = 0.0007) was found between the number of different practitioners seen by a service user in the first seven days of care and the LOS.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a high number of different staff in the early period of IOC episodes correlates with an extended LOS. Future research must clarify the exact mechanisms of this correlation. Furthermore, it should be investigated how the multiple professions within IOC teams influence the LOS and the quality of treatment and what quality indicators may be suitable to ensure treatment processes.

摘要

背景

诸如危机解决或居家治疗团队等强化形式的外展心理健康护理(IOC)越来越多地被用作住院治疗的替代方案,以可比的成本和结果在家中提供以康复为导向的治疗。然而,IOC存在的一个问题是提供家访的工作人员缺乏连续性,这使得建立关系和有意义的治疗交流变得复杂。本研究的目的是使用绩效数据验证现有的主要定性研究结果,并探讨IOC治疗中涉及的工作人员数量与服务使用者住院时间(LOS)之间可能存在的相关性。

方法

对德国东部一个集水区的IOC团队的常规数据进行了分析。计算了服务提供的基本参数,并对工作人员的连续性进行了深入的描述性分析。此外,进行了一项探索性单病例分析,展示了一名工作人员连续性低和一名工作人员连续性高的病例的所有治疗接触的确切顺序。

结果

我们基于178名IOC使用者分析了11,598次面对面治疗接触。平均住院时间为30.99天。所有家访中约75%是由两名或更多工作人员同时进行的。每个治疗阶段,服务使用者平均见到10.24名不同的工作人员。在11%的护理日,只有不认识的工作人员进行家访,在34%的护理日,至少有一名不认识的工作人员进行家访。83%的接触是由相同的三名工作人员进行的,51%的接触是由同一名工作人员进行的。在护理的前七天,服务使用者见到的不同从业者数量与住院时间之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.0007)。

结论

我们的结果表明,IOC治疗初期有大量不同的工作人员与延长的住院时间相关。未来的研究必须阐明这种相关性的确切机制。此外,应该研究IOC团队中的多个专业如何影响住院时间和治疗质量,以及哪些质量指标可能适合确保治疗过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/edd43ab0f789/fpsyt-14-1166197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/edd159e229a8/fpsyt-14-1166197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/ed2cc3e806c7/fpsyt-14-1166197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/8a1247fb2696/fpsyt-14-1166197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/00c636fedf85/fpsyt-14-1166197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/96e1217e9c9b/fpsyt-14-1166197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/edd43ab0f789/fpsyt-14-1166197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/edd159e229a8/fpsyt-14-1166197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/ed2cc3e806c7/fpsyt-14-1166197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/8a1247fb2696/fpsyt-14-1166197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/00c636fedf85/fpsyt-14-1166197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/96e1217e9c9b/fpsyt-14-1166197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/10204706/edd43ab0f789/fpsyt-14-1166197-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
How to measure staff continuity in intensive psychiatric home treatment: a routine data and single case analysis.如何衡量强化精神病家庭治疗中的工作人员连续性:常规数据与单病例分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1166197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1166197. eCollection 2023.
2
Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.平等获得外展心理健康服务的机会?探讨居住地如何影响德国农村服务区密集家庭治疗的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y.
3
Accompanying mental health problems at home: Preliminary data from a crisis resolution and home treatment team in Catalonia.居家时伴随出现的心理健康问题:来自加泰罗尼亚危机解决与居家治疗团队的初步数据。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):974-982. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12918. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
5
6
Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis.针对近期发病精神病的专业早期干预团队(延长时间)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 2;11(11):CD013287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013287.pub2.
7
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Psychosocial Care Delivery in Intensive Home Treatment During a Mental Health Crisis: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.心理健康危机期间强化居家治疗中的心理社会护理提供:一项定性主题分析
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;33(6):2257-2266. doi: 10.1111/inm.13394. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Can a crisis resolution team replace an inpatient ward? Results from a French quasi-experimental study.危机解决小组能否取代住院病房?一项法国准实验研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12396-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.平等获得外展心理健康服务的机会?探讨居住地如何影响德国农村服务区密集家庭治疗的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y.
2
Needs and Experiences in Psychiatric Treatment (NEPT)- Piloting a Collaboratively Generated, Initial Research Tool to Evaluate Cross-Sectoral Mental Health Services.精神科治疗的需求与体验(NEPT)——试用一种通过合作生成的初始研究工具来评估跨部门心理健康服务
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 27;13:781726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.781726. eCollection 2022.
3
Acceptability of Using Social Media Content in Mental Health Research: A Reflection. Comment on "Twitter Users' Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis".
在心理健康研究中使用社交媒体内容的可接受性:反思。对“推特用户对心理健康危机解决团队护理的看法与利益相关者访谈和焦点小组的比较:定性分析”的评论
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Aug 17;8(8):e32475. doi: 10.2196/32475.
4
Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial.德国精神卫生保健中住院等效家庭治疗的实施、效果、成本和流程(AKtiV):一项混合方法、参与式、准实验研究的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9.
5
["I Indeed Consider it to be a Temporary Solution" - A Qualitative Analysis of the Conditions and Obstacles to Implementation of Psychiatric Home-Treatment in Berlin and Brandenburg].["我确实认为这是一个临时解决方案”——对柏林和勃兰登堡州精神科居家治疗实施条件与障碍的质性分析]
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 May;48(4):193-200. doi: 10.1055/a-1274-3662. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach.制定最佳实践模型以管理痴呆症患者危机的团队:共识方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 13;20(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0.
7
Experiences of intensive home treatment for a mental health crisis during the perinatal period: A UK qualitative study.围产期心理健康危机强化家庭治疗的体验:一项英国定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(1):208-218. doi: 10.1111/inm.12774. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
Patients' experiences and satisfaction with home treatment for acute mental illness: a mixed-methods retrospective study.患者对急性精神疾病居家治疗的体验与满意度:一项混合方法的回顾性研究。
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):757-764. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1803233. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
9
Crisis resolution and home treatment in the UK: A survey of model fidelity using a novel review methodology.英国的危机解决和家庭治疗:使用新的综述方法评估模式保真度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(2):187-201. doi: 10.1111/inm.12658. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Home treatment for acute mental healthcare: randomised controlled trial.家庭治疗急性精神卫生保健:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):323-330. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.31.