• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国精神卫生保健中住院等效家庭治疗的实施、效果、成本和流程(AKtiV):一项混合方法、参与式、准实验研究的方案。

Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Clinic Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9
PMID:33781237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach services. In 2018, a new law enabled national mental health care providers to implement team-based crisis intervention services on a regular basis, allowing for different forms of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT). IEHT is similar to the internationally known Home Treatment or Crisis Resolution Teams. It provides acute psychiatric treatment at the user's home, similar to inpatient hospital treatment in terms of content, flexibility, and complexity.

METHODS/DESIGN: The presented naturalistic, quasi-experimental cohort study will evaluate IEHT in ten hospitals running IEHT services in different German regions. Within a multi-method research approach, it will evaluate stakeholders' experiences of care, service use, efficacy, costs, treatment processes and implementation processes of IEHT from different perspectives. Quantitative surveys will be used to recruit 360 service users. Subsequently, 180 service users receiving IEHT will be compared with 180 matched statistical 'twins' receiving standard inpatient treatment. Assessments will take place at baseline as well as after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospital re-admission rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the combined readmission rate, total number of inpatient hospital days, treatment discontinuation rate, quality of life, psycho-social functioning, job integration, recovery, satisfaction with care, shared decision-making, and treatment costs. Additionally, the study will assess the burden of care and satisfaction with care among relatives or informal caregivers. A collaborative research team made up of researchers with and without lived experience of mental distress will conduct qualitative investigations with service users, caregivers and IEHT staff teams to explore critical ingredients and interactions between implementation processes, treatment processes, and outcomes from a stakeholder perspective.

DISCUSSION

By integrating outcome, process and implementation research as well as different stakeholder perspectives and experiences in one study, this trial captures the various facets of IEHT as a special form of home treatment. Therefore, it allows for an adequate, comprehensive evaluation on different levels of this complex intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registrations: 1) German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS000224769. Registered December 3rd 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do ; 2) ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT0474550 . Registered February 9th 2021.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,许多高收入国家已经成功地为急性护理实施了积极的外展精神卫生服务。尽管有证据表明这些服务对服务使用者有多项益处,但德国却落后了,并且在外展服务的实施方面进展缓慢。2018 年,一项新法律使国家精神卫生服务提供者能够定期实施基于团队的危机干预服务,从而提供不同形式的住院等效家庭治疗(IEHT)。IEHT 类似于国际知名的家庭治疗或危机解决小组。它在用户家中提供急性精神病治疗,在内容、灵活性和复杂性方面与住院医院治疗相似。

方法/设计:本研究是一项自然主义、准实验性队列研究,将评估在德国不同地区运行 IEHT 服务的十家医院中的 IEHT。在多方法研究方法中,它将从不同角度评估利益相关者对护理、服务使用、疗效、成本、治疗过程和 IEHT 实施过程的体验。将使用定量调查来招募 360 名服务使用者。随后,将比较 180 名接受 IEHT 的服务使用者与 180 名接受标准住院治疗的匹配统计“双胞胎”。评估将在基线以及 6 个月和 12 个月时进行。主要结果是 12 个月内的医院再入院率。次要结果包括联合再入院率、总住院天数、治疗中断率、生活质量、心理社会功能、工作融入、康复、护理满意度、共同决策以及治疗成本。此外,该研究还将评估护理负担和亲属或非正式照顾者对护理的满意度。由具有和没有精神困扰生活经验的研究人员组成的合作研究团队将对服务使用者、照顾者和 IEHT 工作人员团队进行定性研究,从利益相关者的角度探索实施过程、治疗过程和结果之间的关键因素和相互作用。

讨论

通过将结果、过程和实施研究以及不同利益相关者的观点和经验整合到一项研究中,该试验从特殊的家庭治疗形式的角度捕捉了 IEHT 的各种方面。因此,它允许对这种复杂干预措施的不同层面进行充分、全面的评估。

试验注册

试验注册:1)德国临床试验注册处(DRKS),DRKS000224769。于 2020 年 12 月 3 日注册,https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do;2)ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT0474550。于 2021 年 2 月 9 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552d/8008509/ec8d5789a49c/12888_2021_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552d/8008509/ec8d5789a49c/12888_2021_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552d/8008509/ec8d5789a49c/12888_2021_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial.德国精神卫生保健中住院等效家庭治疗的实施、效果、成本和流程(AKtiV):一项混合方法、参与式、准实验研究的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9.
2
Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.平等获得外展心理健康服务的机会?探讨居住地如何影响德国农村服务区密集家庭治疗的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y.
3
Premature termination, satisfaction with care, and shared decision-making during home treatment compared to inpatient treatment: A quasi-experimental trial.提前终止治疗、对治疗的满意度以及家庭治疗与住院治疗相比的决策共享:一项准实验研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 8;66(1):e71. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2443.
4
[Comparison of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) with Standard Inpatient Treatment: A Matched Cohort Study].住院等效家庭治疗(IEHT)与标准住院治疗的比较:一项匹配队列研究
Psychiatr Prax. 2022 Nov;49(8):405-410. doi: 10.1055/a-1615-8763. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Patient satisfaction in inpatient psychiatric treatment compared with inpatient equivalent home treatment in Germany: an in-depth qualitative study.德国住院精神科治疗与住院等效家庭治疗的患者满意度:一项深入的定性研究。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 29;3:1195614. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1195614. eCollection 2023.
6
[Inpatient equivalent home-treatment: an overview].[住院等效家庭治疗:概述]
Nervenarzt. 2022 May;93(5):520-528. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01272-8. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.心理健康危机解决团队的核心服务改进计划:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 22;17:158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1283-7.
8
Evaluating mental health decision units in acute care pathways (DECISION): a quasi-experimental, qualitative and health economic evaluation.评估急性护理路径中的心理健康决策单元(DECISION):一项准实验性、定性和健康经济评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Dec;11(25):1-221. doi: 10.3310/PBSM2274.
9
10
[Developing An Initial Best Practice Model For Inpatient Equivalent Psychiatric Home Treatment From The Perspective Of Service Users: Consensus Process With Participatory Features].[从服务使用者角度制定住院等效精神科居家治疗的初始最佳实践模型:具有参与性特征的共识过程]
Psychiatr Prax. 2025 Jan;52(1):26-34. doi: 10.1055/a-2406-9128. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Utility of Intensive Home Treatment Compared With Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Admission.与急性精神科住院治疗相比,强化家庭治疗的成本效用
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12465.
2
Can a crisis resolution team replace an inpatient ward? Results from a French quasi-experimental study.危机解决小组能否取代住院病房?一项法国准实验研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12396-3.
3
[A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].

本文引用的文献

1
[Comparison of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) with Standard Inpatient Treatment: A Matched Cohort Study].住院等效家庭治疗(IEHT)与标准住院治疗的比较:一项匹配队列研究
Psychiatr Prax. 2022 Nov;49(8):405-410. doi: 10.1055/a-1615-8763. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
["I Indeed Consider it to be a Temporary Solution" - A Qualitative Analysis of the Conditions and Obstacles to Implementation of Psychiatric Home-Treatment in Berlin and Brandenburg].["我确实认为这是一个临时解决方案”——对柏林和勃兰登堡州精神科居家治疗实施条件与障碍的质性分析]
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 May;48(4):193-200. doi: 10.1055/a-1274-3662. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
直接入住等同于住院的家庭治疗与从精神科病房转来的情况比较
Psychiatr Prax. 2025 Apr;52(3):129-134. doi: 10.1055/a-2477-3639. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.强化家庭治疗后精神科医院服务的利用:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2445042. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042.
5
Evaluation of a flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) program for patients with severe mental illness: an observational study in Salzburg, Austria.针对重度精神疾病患者的灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)项目评估:奥地利萨尔茨堡的一项观察性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 9;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00628-8.
6
Premature termination, satisfaction with care, and shared decision-making during home treatment compared to inpatient treatment: A quasi-experimental trial.提前终止治疗、对治疗的满意度以及家庭治疗与住院治疗相比的决策共享:一项准实验研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 8;66(1):e71. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2443.
7
Patient satisfaction in inpatient psychiatric treatment compared with inpatient equivalent home treatment in Germany: an in-depth qualitative study.德国住院精神科治疗与住院等效家庭治疗的患者满意度:一项深入的定性研究。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 29;3:1195614. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1195614. eCollection 2023.
8
How to measure staff continuity in intensive psychiatric home treatment: a routine data and single case analysis.如何衡量强化精神病家庭治疗中的工作人员连续性:常规数据与单病例分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1166197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1166197. eCollection 2023.
9
Current insights of community mental healthcare for people with severe mental illness: A scoping review.严重精神疾病患者社区精神卫生保健的当前见解:一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 18;14:1156235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1156235. eCollection 2023.
10
Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.平等获得外展心理健康服务的机会?探讨居住地如何影响德国农村服务区密集家庭治疗的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y.
[From Theory into Practice - Early Experiences with Home Treatment in Munich, Germany].
[从理论到实践——德国慕尼黑家庭治疗的早期经验]
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 Jul;48(5):269-272. doi: 10.1055/a-1276-6637. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Changes in German Mental Health Care by Implementing a Global Treatment Budget-A Mixed-Method Process Evaluation Study.通过实施全球治疗预算对德国精神卫生保健的影响——一项混合方法的过程评估研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 25;11:426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00426. eCollection 2020.
5
[Clinical Effectiveness of "FlexiTeam" (Home Treatment and Intensive Outpatient Treatment) - Comparison of a Model Project According to § 64b in Berlin with Inpatient Treatment-as-Usual].["灵活团队"(居家治疗与强化门诊治疗)的临床疗效——柏林一项依据§ 64b开展的示范项目与常规住院治疗的比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Jul;46(5):249-255. doi: 10.1055/a-0881-1124. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
Home treatment for acute mental healthcare: randomised controlled trial.家庭治疗急性精神卫生保健:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;216(6):323-330. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.31.
7
A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing the Measurement Properties of the Three-Level and Five-Level Versions of the EQ-5D.三水平版和五水平版 EQ-5D 测量性能比较的系统评价研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):645-661. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0642-5.
8
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.
9
[Participatory and Collaborative Strategies in Psychiatric Research].[精神病学研究中的参与式与协作式策略]
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Nov;44(8):431-433. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120241. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
An Experience-Based Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L in Germany.德国基于经验的EQ-5D-5L价值集
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1150-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Jun 1.